IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i3p139-d774139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biopolitical Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia, France, Germany, and the UK: The “Post-Truth” Coverage by RT

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Yatsyk

    (Institut de Recherche Historique du Septentrion UMR 8529, CNRS, University of Lille, 59653 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
    Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, 51003 Tartu, Estonia)

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine the COVID-19 crisis in Russia, France, Germany, and the UK, as covered by the Russian state media outlet RT (formerly Russia Today). I view the RT coverage through the prism of biopolitics and critical discourse analysis (CDA) to demonstrate multiple discrepancies in its “post-truth” knowledge production strategies. I argue that these strategies aim to expose the hybrid and controversial nature of biopolitical governance in Western democracies during the COVID-19 pandemic as they struggle to strike a balance between imposing social restrictions and safeguarding public health. I also show how the (post)liberal biopolitical debate on personal responsibility and state resilience in times of emergency could be applied by authoritarian regimes for self-description.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Yatsyk, 2022. "Biopolitical Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia, France, Germany, and the UK: The “Post-Truth” Coverage by RT," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:139-:d:774139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarina Giritli Nygren & Anna Olofsson, 2020. "Managing the Covid-19 pandemic through individual responsibility: the consequences of a world risk society and enhanced ethopolitics," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1031-1035, August.
    2. Isabela Fairclough & Norman Fairclough, 2013. "Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 11(3), pages 336-344, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Paola Tubaro & Antonio A Casilli, 2024. "Who bears the burden of a pandemic? COVID-19 and the transfer of risk to digital platform workers," Post-Print hal-03369291, HAL.
    3. Kim, Min Sung & Jung, Yoonhyuk & Kim, Junghwan, 2021. "A study on factors affecting privacy risk tolerance to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in South Korea," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 735-741.
    4. Tiziana Campisi & Socrates Basbas & Anastasios Skoufas & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Katarina Giritli Nygren & Maja Klinga & Anna Olofsson & Susanna Öhman, 2021. "The Language of Risk and Vulnerability in Covering the COVID-19 Pandemic in Swedish Mass Media in 2020: Implications for the Sustainable Management of Elderly Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Walid Gani, 2021. "The causal relationship between corruption and irresponsible behavior in the time of COVID‐19: Evidence from Tunisia," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(S1), pages 165-176, April.
    7. Verma, Surabhi & Gustafsson, Anders, 2020. "Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 253-261.
    8. Beniamino Callegari & Christophe Feder, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and the systemic consequences of epidemics: A literature review and emerging model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1653-1684, December.
    9. Kirsten Vanderplanken & Stephan Van den Broucke & Isabelle Aujoulat & Joris Adriaan Frank van Loenhout, 2021. "The Relation between Perceived and Actual Understanding and Adherence: Results from a National Survey on COVID-19 Measures in Belgium," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    10. Liu, Piper Liping, 2021. "COVID-19 information on social media and preventive behaviors: Managing the pandemic through personal responsibility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Haisheng Hu & Keshuai Xu, 2022. "Visualizing the Development of Research on Tourism Resilience With Mixed Methods," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    12. Nele Brusselaers & David Steadson & Kelly Bjorklund & Sofia Breland & Jens Stilhoff Sörensen & Andrew Ewing & Sigurd Bergmann & Gunnar Steineck, 2022. "Evaluation of science advice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Manca, Terra & Humble, Robin M. & Aylsworth, Laura & Cha, Eunah & Wilson, Sarah E. & Meyer, Samantha B. & Greyson, Devon & Sadarangani, Manish & Parsons Leigh, Jeanna & MacDonald, Shannon E., 2022. "“We need to protect each other”: COVID-19 vaccination intentions and concerns among Racialized minority and Indigenous Peoples in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    14. Andreea-Mihaela Stoica, 2020. "From Challenges to Opportunities in Educational Management during COVID-19 Pandemic: The case of Fun Science Romania," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 31(1), pages 101-107, December.
    15. Roger Koppl & Kira Pronin & Nick Cowen & Marta Podemska-Mikluch & Pablo Paniagua Prieto, 2023. "Bespoke scapegoats: Scientific advisory bodies and blame avoidance in the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond," Papers 2310.04312, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    16. Mahmoud El Hassouni & Mustapha Machrafi, 2023. "Decision, National Culture and Legitimacies of Government Responses in Times of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe [Décision, Culture nationale et légitimités des réponses gouvernementales en période de," Post-Print hal-03843567, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:139-:d:774139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.