IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i5p147-d541322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media and the Variable Impact of Violence Reduction Interventions: Re-Examining Focused Deterrence in Philadelphia

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan M. Hyatt

    (Department of Criminology and Justice Studies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • James A. Densley

    (School of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, MN 55445, USA)

  • Caterina G. Roman

    (Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)

Abstract

Focused deterrence is a gang violence reduction strategy that relies on a unique mix of strong enforcement messages from law enforcement and judicial officials coupled with the promise of additional services. At the heart of the intervention is a coordinated effort to communicate the costs and consequences of gun violence to identified gang members during face-to-face meetings and additional community messaging. In Philadelphia, focused deterrence was implemented between 2013 and 2016, and although an impact evaluation showed a significant decrease in shootings in targeted areas relative to matched comparison neighborhoods, the effect on targeted gangs was not universal, with some exhibiting no change or an increase in gun-related activity. Here, we employ data on group-level social media usage and content to examine the correlations with gun violence. We find that several factors, including the nature of social media activity by the gang (e.g., extent of activity and who is engaging), are associated with increases in the average rate of gang-attributable shootings during the evaluation period, while content-specific variables (e.g., direct threats towards rivals and law enforcement) were not associated with increases in shootings. Implications for violence reduction policy, including the implementation of focused deterrence, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan M. Hyatt & James A. Densley & Caterina G. Roman, 2021. "Social Media and the Variable Impact of Violence Reduction Interventions: Re-Examining Focused Deterrence in Philadelphia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:147-:d:541322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/5/147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/5/147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braga, Anthony A., 2008. "Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 332-343, August.
    2. Kiminori Nakamura & George Tita & David Krackhardt, 2020. "Violence in the “balance”: a structural analysis of how rivals, allies, and third-parties shape inter-gang violence," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 3-27, January.
    3. Solomiia Fedushko & Tomáš Peráček & Yuriy Syerov & Olha Trach, 2021. "Development of Methods for the Strategic Management of Web Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Valasik & Shannon E. Reid, 2021. "“The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same”: Research on Gang-Related Violence in the 21st Century—Introduction to Special Issue," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-5, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naci Akdemir & Serkan Yenal, 2021. "How Phishers Exploit the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Themed Phishing Emails," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    2. Mirko Duradoni & Stefania Collodi & Serena Coppolino Perfumi & Andrea Guazzini, 2021. "Reviewing Stranger on the Internet: The Role of Identifiability through “Reputation” in Online Decision Making," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Matthew Valasik & Shannon E. Reid, 2021. "East Side Story: Disaggregating Gang Homicides in East Los Angeles," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Joshua C. Hinkle & David Weisburd & Cody W. Telep & Kevin Petersen, 2020. "Problem‐oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), June.
    5. Okkyung Lee & Yejin Lee & Heeran Lee, 2021. "Investigation of Fashion Sharing Platform for Sustainable Economy—Korean and International Fashion Websites before and after COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Gravel, Jason & Bouchard, Martin & Descormiers, Karine & Wong, Jennifer S. & Morselli, Carlo, 2013. "Keeping promises: A systematic review and a new classification of gang control strategies," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 228-242.
    7. Iveta Šimberová & Antonín Korauš & David Schüller & Lenka Širáňová & Jarmila Straková & Jan Váchal, 2022. "Threats and Opportunities in Digital Transformation in SMEs from the Perspective of Sustainability: A Case Study in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Modipa Mmakwena, 2022. "Analysing the impact of taxi violence on commuters in South Africa," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 899-911, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:147-:d:541322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.