IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i1p26-d481122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvements in Evaluating Grids for Basic Living Infrastructure: The Case of Gwangjin District in Seoul, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Wooseok Kang

    (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 5 Gukchaegyeonguwon-ro, Sejong-si 30149, Korea)

  • Narang Park

    (School of Family and Consumer Sciences, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Wookjae Heo

    (Department of Consumer Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57006, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status and needs of infrastructure for basic life in Gwangjin district in Seoul, South Korea. In this study, we examined whether the national minimum standard was satisfied in terms of the infrastructure for basic life in the district. Specifically, we employed and compared the empirical utilities of two types of geographic datasets, 100-square-meter grids and 500-square-meter grids. The study compares the prediction accuracy between two types of geographic datasets by employing multivariate linear estimation using influential factors. The evaluation methods for prediction accuracy were to compare the root mean of squared error (RMSE) and mean of absolute error (MAE) from each dataset. The results were as follows: (a) the dataset with 100-square-meter grids showed more significant associations among influential factors and the infrastructure than the dataset with 500-square-meter grids; (b) the 100-square-meter grids showed better prediction accuracy compared with the 500-square-meter grids; and (c) in terms of basic level local government, it was more powerful to use the datasets with 100-square-meter grids for finding blind sides of infrastructure than the datasets with 500-square-meter grids. The results imply that it is necessary to adjust urban policy by using appropriate datasets, such as 100-square-meter grids.

Suggested Citation

  • Wooseok Kang & Narang Park & Wookjae Heo, 2021. "Improvements in Evaluating Grids for Basic Living Infrastructure: The Case of Gwangjin District in Seoul, South Korea," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:26-:d:481122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chichilnisky,Graciela (ed.), 1999. "Markets, Information and Uncertainty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521553551.
    2. Ranjan Ku Dash & Pravakar Sahoo, 2010. "Economic growth in India: the role of physical and social infrastructure," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 373-385.
    3. Ranjan Ku Dash & Pravakar Sahoo, 2010. "Economic growth in India: the role of physical and social infrastructure," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 373-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hülya Saygılı & K. Azim Özdemir, 2021. "Regional economic growth in Turkey: the effects of physical, social and financial infrastructure investment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 2039-2061, April.
    2. Zhang, Yijia & Cheng, Lu, 2023. "The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 223-233.
    3. Pravakar Sahoo & Ashwani Bishnoi, 2021. "Investment Slowdown in India: Role of Fiscal-Monetary policy and Economic Uncertainty," IEG Working Papers 439, Institute of Economic Growth.
    4. Ignas Lukosevicius, 2020. "European Union Transport Infrastructure: Roads and Railways Subsectors Case," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(4), pages 305-318.
    5. Madhusudan Ghosh, 2017. "Infrastructure and Development in Rural India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 11(3), pages 256-289, August.
    6. Gao, Yuan & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Zhou, Lin & Li, Zhibin & Hou, Deyi, 2019. "Supplying social infrastructure land for satisfying public needs or leasing residential land? A study of local government choices in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Wang, Shih-Hsu, 2016. "An analytical model for benchmarking the development of national infrastructure items against those in similar countries," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 3-18.
    8. Xuan Sun & Weikai Wang & Tao Sun & Ya Ping Wang, 2018. "Understanding the Living Conditions of Chinese Urban Neighborhoods through Social Infrastructure Configurations: The Case Study of Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Stern,David S. & Das,Debasish Kumar, 2021. "How Much Does Physical Infrastructure Contribute to Economic Growth ? An Empirical Analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9888, The World Bank.
    10. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Hochman,Gal & Song,Ze, 2020. "Infrastructure, Economic Growth, and Poverty : A Review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9258, The World Bank.
    11. Ghosh, Prabir Kumar, 2020. "Nexus between Infrastructure and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study in the Post-Reform period in India," MPRA Paper 117709, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2021.
    12. Nisha S. Simon & P. Natarajan, 2017. "Nonlinearity between Infrastructure Inequality and Growth," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 9(1-2), pages 66-82, April.
    13. Feng, Wei & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "The impact of medical infrastructure on regional innovation: An empirical analysis of China's prefecture-level cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    14. Yeonsoo Kim & Jooseok Oh & Seiyong Kim, 2020. "The Transition from Traditional Infrastructure to Living SOC and Its Effectiveness for Community Sustainability: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Ahmed MUSABEH & Mehdi ZOUAOUI, 2020. "Policies and Variables affecting FDI: A Panel Data Analysis of North African Countries," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Fernando Coelho Martins Ferreira & Cristiane Biazzin & Paul C. Hong, 2024. "Transition Paths of Brazil from an Agricultural Economy to a Regional Powerhouse: A Global Supply Chain Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Kumari, Anita & Kumar Sharma, Anil, 2017. "Infrastructure financing and development: A bibliometric review," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 49-65.
    18. Pravakar Sahoo & Abhirup Bhunia, 2014. "China's Manufacturing Success Lessons for India," IEG Working Papers 344, Institute of Economic Growth.
    19. Eberechukwu Uneze, 2013. "The relation between capital formation and economic growth: evidence from sub-Saharan African countries," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 272-286, September.
    20. Kemp Murray C. & Shimomura Koji, 2002. "Recent Challenges to the Classical Gains-from-Trade Proposition," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 3(4), pages 485-489, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:26-:d:481122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.