IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/germec/v3y2002i4p485-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent Challenges to the Classical Gains-from-Trade Proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Kemp Murray C.

    (CES and UNSW,Sydney, Australia)

  • Shimomura Koji

    (RIEB, Kobe University,Hyogo, Japan)

Abstract

The classical gains-from-trade conjecture was finally given a thorough Arrow±Debreu proof in 1972. Since then, the proposition has been repeatedly challenged. Some of the challenges rest on grounds which in no respect violate Arrow±Debreu assumptions. Those challenges are therefore without foundation. The remaining challenges rest on the assertion that some of the Arrow±Debreu assumptions are unnatural and unnecessarily restrictive or on the imposition of artificial restrictions on the set of permissible compensatory transfers. We conclude that none of the challenges can be sustained.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemp Murray C. & Shimomura Koji, 2002. "Recent Challenges to the Classical Gains-from-Trade Proposition," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 3(4), pages 485-489, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:3:y:2002:i:4:p:485-489
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0475.00069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0475.00069
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0475.00069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chichilnisky,Graciela (ed.), 1999. "Markets, Information and Uncertainty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521553551, September.
    2. Grandmont, J. M. & McFadden, D., 1972. "A technical note on classical gains from trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 109-125, May.
    3. Cordella, Tito & Ventura, Luigi, 1992. "A note on redistributions and gains from trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 449-453, August.
    4. CORDELLA, Tito & MINELLI, Enrico & POLEMARCHAKIS, Heracles, 1993. "Trade and Welfare," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1993033, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
      • CORDELLA, Tito & MINELLI, Enrico & POLEMARCHAKIS, Heracles, 1999. "Trade and welfare," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1379, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. David M. G. Newbery & Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1984. "Pareto Inferior Trade," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 51(1), pages 1-12.
    6. Paul Tompkinson, 1999. "The Gains from Trade in a Ricardian Model When Workers Have Preferences among Occupations," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 611-620, July.
    7. Kemp, Murray C & Wan, Henry Y, Jr, 1972. "The Gains from Free Trade," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 13(3), pages 509-522, October.
    8. Eliakim Katz & Moshe Syrquin & Lester C. Thurow, 1982. "The Failure of Psychic Income as a Source of Market Failure [with Reply]," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 623-628, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang Kerber & Oliver Budzinski, "undated". "Towards a Differentiated Analysis of Competition of Competition Laws," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2004-1-1090, Berkeley Electronic Press.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Mandler, 2001. "Accessible Pareto-Improvements: Using Market Information to Reform Inefficiencies," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1320, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Jaume Sempere, 2022. "On potential Pareto gains from free trade areas formation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(6), pages 1502-1518, December.
    3. Kemp, Murray, 2008. "Non-competing factor groups and the normative propositions of trade theory," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 388-390.
    4. Willmann, Gerald, 2004. "Pareto gains from trade: a dynamic counterexample," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 199-204, May.
    5. Peter J. Hammond & Jaume Sempere, 2006. "Gains from Trade versus Gains from Migration: What Makes Them So Different?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 8(1), pages 145-170, January.
    6. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2007. "The Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains?," Working Papers 001-08, International School of Economics at TSU, Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia, revised Mar 2008.
    7. Tran Nam Binh, 1985. "A Neo‐Ricardian Trade Model with Overlapping Generations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 61(4), pages 707-718, December.
    8. Kenji Fujiwara & Norimichi Matsueda, 2007. "An endogenous timing analysis of international duopoly with transboundary stock pollution," Discussion Paper Series 31, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Apr 2007.
    9. Kemp, Murray & Wan, Henry, Jr., 2003. "Tariff Reform: Some Pre-strategic Considerations," Working Papers 03-01, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
    10. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2007. "The Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains?, Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 08-009, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 26 Feb 2008.
    11. Murray C. Kemp, 2010. "The Gains from Trade in a Cournot–Nash Trading Equilibrium," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 832-834, November.
    12. Willmann, Gerald & Debaere, Peter & Glaser, Toni, 2015. "Choosing between Protectionism and Free Trade in an Uncertain World," CEPR Discussion Papers 10625, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The overselling of globalization," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 129-137, July.
    14. Eden, Benjamin, 2007. "Inefficient trade patterns: Excessive trade, cross-hauling and dumping," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 175-188, September.
    15. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Sin-Yu Ho & N.M. Odhiambo, 2018. "Analysing the macroeconomic drivers of stock market development in the Philippines," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1451265-145, January.
    17. Jonathan Heathcote & Fabrizio Perri, 2016. "On the Desirability of Capital Controls," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 64(1), pages 75-102, May.
    18. Esposito, Federico, 2022. "Demand risk and diversification through international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Tom Krebs & Pravin Krishna & William Maloney, 2010. "Trade Policy, Income Risk, and Welfare," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(3), pages 467-481, August.
    20. Lyon, Spencer G. & Waugh, Michael E., 2018. "Redistributing the gains from trade through progressive taxation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 185-202.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:3:y:2002:i:4:p:485-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.