IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i7p137-d597628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Priori Ratemaking Selection Using Multivariate Regression Models Allowing Different Coverages in Auto Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Economics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

  • Enrique Calderín-Ojeda

    (Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3031, Australia)

Abstract

A comprehensive auto insurance policy usually provides the broadest protection for the most common events for which the policyholder would file a claim. On the other hand, some insurers offer extended third-party car insurance to adapt to the personal needs of every policyholder. The extra coverage includes cover against fire, natural hazards, theft, windscreen repair, and legal expenses, among some other coverages that apply to specific events that may cause damage to the insured’s vehicle. In this paper, a multivariate distribution, based on a conditional specification, is proposed to account for different numbers of claims for different coverages. Then, the premium is computed for each type of coverage separately rather than for the total claims number. Closed-form expressions are given for moments and cross-moments, parameter estimates, and for a priori premiums when different premiums principles are considered. In addition, the severity of claims can be incorporated into this multivariate model to derive multivariate claims’ severity distributions. The model is extended by developing a zero-inflated version. Regression models for both multivariate families are derived. These models are used to fit a real auto insurance portfolio that includes five types of coverage. Our findings show that some specific covariates are statistically significant in some coverages, yet they are not so for others.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2021. "A Priori Ratemaking Selection Using Multivariate Regression Models Allowing Different Coverages in Auto Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:137-:d:597628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yin & Tian, Guo-Liang, 2015. "Type I multivariate zero-inflated Poisson distribution with applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 200-222.
    2. Zhang, Pengcheng & Calderin, Enrique & Li, Shuanming & Wu, Xueyuan, 2020. "On the Type I multivariate zero-truncated hurdle model with applications in health insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 35-45.
    3. Cummins, J. David & Wiltbank, Laurel J., 1984. "A Multivariate Model of the Total Claims Process," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 45-52, April.
    4. Edward W. Frees & Gee Lee & Lu Yang, 2016. "Multivariate Frequency-Severity Regression Models in Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-36, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minwoo Kim & Himchan Jeong & Dipak Dey, 2022. "Approximation of Zero-Inflated Poisson Credibility Premium via Variational Bayes Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Lu Yang & Claudia Czado, 2022. "Two‐part D‐vine copula models for longitudinal insurance claim data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1534-1561, December.
    3. Garrido, J. & Genest, C. & Schulz, J., 2016. "Generalized linear models for dependent frequency and severity of insurance claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 205-215.
    4. Šoltés Erik & Zelinová Silvia & Bilíková Mária, 2019. "General Linear Model: An Effective Tool For Analysis Of Claim Severity In Motor Third Party Liability Insurance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(4), pages 13-31, December.
    5. Youn Ahn, Jae & Jeong, Himchan & Lu, Yang, 2021. "On the ordering of credibility factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 626-638.
    6. Massimo Costabile & Fabio Viviano, 2021. "Modeling the Future Value Distribution of a Life Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Yves Staudt & Joël Wagner, 2021. "Assessing the Performance of Random Forests for Modeling Claim Severity in Collision Car Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Park, Sojung C. & Kim, Joseph H.T. & Ahn, Jae Youn, 2018. "Does hunger for bonuses drive the dependence between claim frequency and severity?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 32-46.
    9. Chen, Zezhun Chen & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2024. "EM estimation for bivariate mixed poisson INAR(1) claim count regression models with correlated random effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118826, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Eling, Martin & Jung, Kwangmin, 2018. "Copula approaches for modeling cross-sectional dependence of data breach losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 167-180.
    11. Ambagaspitiya, Rohana S., 1999. "On the distributions of two classes of correlated aggregate claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 301-308, May.
    12. Tzougas, George & Jeong, Himchan, 2021. "An expectation-maximization algorithm for the exponential-generalized inverse Gaussian regression model with varying dispersion and shape for modelling the aggregate claim amount," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Martin Eling & Kwangmin Jung, 2022. "Heterogeneity in cyber loss severity and its impact on cyber risk measurement," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 273-297, December.
    14. George Tzougas & Himchan Jeong, 2021. "An Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for the Exponential-Generalized Inverse Gaussian Regression Model with Varying Dispersion and Shape for Modelling the Aggregate Claim Amount," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Kaiwen Wang & Jiehui Ding & Kristen R. Lidwell & Scott Manski & Gee Y. Lee & Emilio Xavier Esposito, 2019. "Treatment Level and Store Level Analyses of Healthcare Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Erik Šoltés & Silvia Zelinová & Mária Bilíková, 2019. "General Linear Model: An Effective Tool For Analysis Of Claim Severity In Motor Third Party Liability Insurance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 13-31, December.
    17. Quan Zhiyu & Valdez Emiliano A., 2018. "Predictive analytics of insurance claims using multivariate decision trees," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 377-407, December.
    18. Oh, Rosy & Jeong, Himchan & Ahn, Jae Youn & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2021. "A multi-year microlevel collective risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 309-328.
    19. Cheung, Eric C.K. & Ni, Weihong & Oh, Rosy & Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2021. "Bayesian credibility under a bivariate prior on the frequency and the severity of claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 274-295.
    20. Marian Reiff & Erik Šoltés & Silvia Komara & Tatiana Šoltésová & Silvia Zelinová, 2022. "Segmentation and estimation of claim severity in motor third-party liability insurance through contrast analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 803-842, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:137-:d:597628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.