IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i11p197-d671912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Management and Risk Management in an Environment of Stochastic Uncertainty (Retail)

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey A. Lochan

    (Department of Tourism and Hotel Business, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tatiana P. Rozanova

    (Department of Logistics and Marketing, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Valery V. Bezpalov

    (Department of National and Regional Economy, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitry V. Fedyunin

    (Department of Advertising, Public Relations and Design, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

In the context of stochastic uncertainty and the increasing complexity of logistics processes in the retail sector, managers face a problem in obtaining accurate forecasts for the dynamics of changes in key business performance indicators. The purpose of the present work is to assess the impact of risk events and unstable conditions on the level of quality of supply chain services and economic indicators of the retail trade network. Using the anyLogistix software tool, a simulation model was constructed that allows assessing operational risks and their impact on key indicators of the supply chain using the bullwhip effect. Besides, a statistical model of the impact of the ripple effect in the event of failures caused by the occurrence of a man-made risk event and the shutdown of production of one of the suppliers on the financial, customer, and operational performance indicators of the supply chain of grocery retail. The results obtained show that the main factors of changes in the supply chain are operational risks associated with fluctuations in demand and order execution time by the distribution center. With a sufficiently high level of occurrence, their impact on productivity and quality of service is low because they can be eliminated in a short time. The simulation results show that the most tangible risks for the food retail supply chain are supply chain failures, whose consequences require significant coordinating efforts and longer recovery times, as well as additional investments. For example, events, such as a fire in one distribution center and the shutdown of production for 1 week of one of the suppliers of dairy products will lead to the loss of USD 181.75 million by the grocery retailer, which is 3% of the expected revenue. We believe that risk management in supply chains is becoming increasingly complex, and to make effective managerial decisions, it is necessary to constantly improve the tools that combine analytical and optimization methods, as well as simulation modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey A. Lochan & Tatiana P. Rozanova & Valery V. Bezpalov & Dmitry V. Fedyunin, 2021. "Supply Chain Management and Risk Management in an Environment of Stochastic Uncertainty (Retail)," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:11:p:197-:d:671912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/11/197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/11/197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lian Qi & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Lawrence V. Snyder, 2010. "The Effect of Supply Disruptions on Supply Chain Design Decisions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 274-289, May.
    2. Elena Vladimirovna Pavlova & Irina Albertovna Duborkina & Antonina Pavlovna Sokolova & Irina Gennadiyevna Doronkina & Elena Evgeniyevna Konovalova, 2017. "Dependence of the Russian Economy on Oil Prices in the Context of Volatility of the Global oil Market: Articulation of Issue," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 225-230.
    3. C.R. Vishnu & R. Sridharan & P.N. Ram Kumar, 2019. "Supply chain risk management: models and methods," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 31-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei Fun Lee & Weng Siew Lam & Weng Hoe Lam, 2023. "Performance Evaluation of the Efficiency of Logistics Companies with Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davood Shishebori & Lawrence Snyder & Mohammad Jabalameli, 2014. "A Reliable Budget-Constrained FL/ND Problem with Unreliable Facilities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 549-580, December.
    2. Zhang, Yanzi & Diabat, Ali & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "Reliable closed-loop supply chain design problem under facility-type-dependent probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 180-209.
    3. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Peng, Fan, 2013. "A supporting station model for reliable infrastructure location design under interdependent disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-93.
    4. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Qi, Mingyao & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "A heterogeneous reliable location model with risk pooling under supply disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 151-178.
    5. Yun, Lifen & Qin, Yong & Fan, Hongqiang & Ji, Changxu & Li, Xiaopeng & Jia, Limin, 2015. "A reliability model for facility location design under imperfect information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 596-615.
    6. Hanieh Shekarabi & Mohammad Mahdi Vali-Siar & Ashkan Mozdgir, 2024. "Food supply chain network design under uncertainty and pandemic disruption," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-37, June.
    7. Gholami-Zanjani, Seyed Mohammad & Klibi, Walid & Jabalameli, Mohammad Saeed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2021. "The design of resilient food supply chain networks prone to epidemic disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. O’Hanley, Jesse R. & Scaparra, M. Paola & García, Sergio, 2013. "Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 63-75.
    9. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Seddighi, Amir Hossein, 2013. "A location-routing problem with disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-82.
    10. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Bai, Yun & Xie, Weijun & Chen, Mingliu & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Reliable emergency service facility location under facility disruption, en-route congestion and in-facility queuing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 199-216.
    11. Milad Mohammadi & Alibakhsh Nikzad, 2023. "Sustainable and reliable closed-loop supply chain network design during pandemic outbreaks and disruptions," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 969-991, June.
    12. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Ruhul Sarker & Daryl Essam, 2018. "A reactive mitigation approach for managing supply disruption in a three-tier supply chain," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1581-1597, October.
    13. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    14. Nader Azad & Georgios Saharidis & Hamid Davoudpour & Hooman Malekly & Seyed Yektamaram, 2013. "Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 125-163, November.
    15. Yun, Lifen & Wang, Xifu & Fan, Hongqiang & Li, Xiaopeng, 2020. "Reliable facility location design with round-trip transportation under imperfect information Part I: A discrete model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Shu, Jia & Li, Zhengyi & Shen, Houcai & Wu, Ting & Zhong, Weijun, 2012. "A logistics network design model with vendor managed inventory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 754-761.
    17. Luangkesorn, K.L. & Klein, G. & Bidanda, B., 2016. "Analysis of production systems with potential for severe disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 478-486.
    18. Trung Hieu Tran & Thu Ba T. Nguyen, 2019. "Alternative-fuel station network design under impact of station failures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 151-186, August.
    19. Schmitt, Thomas G. & Kumar, Sanjay & Stecke, Kathryn E. & Glover, Fred W. & Ehlen, Mark A., 2017. "Mitigating disruptions in a multi-echelon supply chain using adaptive ordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 185-198.
    20. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Maihami, Reza, 2020. "Stochastic optimization of disruption-driven supply chain network design with a new resilience metric," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:11:p:197-:d:671912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.