IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i1p14-d1568619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of South African Asset Market Co-Movement: Evidence from Investor Sentiment and Changing Market Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Moodley

    (School of Economic Science, North-West University, Gauteng 1174, South Africa)

  • Sune Ferreira-Schenk

    (School of Economic Science, North-West University, Gauteng 1174, South Africa)

  • Kago Matlhaku

    (School of Economic Science, North-West University, Gauteng 1174, South Africa)

Abstract

The co-movement of multi-asset markets in emerging markets has become an important determinant for investors seeking diversified portfolios and enhanced portfolio returns. Despite this, studies have failed to examine the determinants of the co-movement of multi-asset markets such as investor sentiment and changing market conditions. Accordingly, this study investigates the effect of investor sentiment on the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets by introducing alternating market conditions. The Markov regime-switching autoregressive (MS-AR) model and Markov regime-switching vector autoregressive (MS-VAR) model impulse response function are used from 2007 March to January 2024. The findings indicate that investor sentiment has a time-varying and regime-specific effect on the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets. In a bull market condition, investor sentiment positively affects the equity–bond and equity–gold co-movement. In the bear market condition, investor sentiment has a negative and significant effect on the equity–bond, equity–property, bond–gold, and bond–property co-movement. Similarly, in a bull regime, the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets positively responds to sentiment shocks, although this is only observed in the short term. However, in the bear market regime, the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets responds positively and negatively to sentiment shocks, despite this being observed in the long run. These observations provide interesting insights to policymakers, investors, and fund managers for portfolio diversification and risk management strategies. That being, the current policies are not robust enough to reduce asset market integration and reduce sentiment-induced markets. Consequently, policymakers must re-examine and amend current policies according to the findings of the study. In addition, portfolio rebalancing in line with the findings of this study is essential for portfolio diversification.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Moodley & Sune Ferreira-Schenk & Kago Matlhaku, 2025. "Determinants of South African Asset Market Co-Movement: Evidence from Investor Sentiment and Changing Market Conditions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1568619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatma Mathlouthi & Slah Bahloul, 2022. "Co-movement and causal relationships between conventional and Islamic stock market returns under regime-switching framework," Journal of Capital Markets Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 166-184, June.
    2. Hamilton, James D, 1989. "A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 357-384, March.
    3. Piljak, Vanja, 2013. "Bond markets co-movement dynamics and macroeconomic factors: Evidence from emerging and frontier markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 29-43.
    4. Fabian Moodley & Ntokozo Nzimande & Paul-Francois Muzindutsi, 2022. "Stock Returns Indices and Changing Macroeconomic Conditions: Evidence from the Johannesburg Securities Exchange," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 109-121, December.
    5. Chiu, Junmao & Chung, Huimin & Ho, Keng-Yu & Wu, Chih-Chiang, 2018. "Investor sentiment and evaporating liquidity during the financial crisis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-36.
    6. Brown, Gregory W. & Cliff, Michael T., 2004. "Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Haritha P H & Abdul Rishad, 2020. "An empirical examination of investor sentiment and stock market volatility: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Hilary Tinotenda Muguto & Lorraine Rupande & Paul-Francois Muzindutsi, 2019. "Investor sentiment and foreign financial flows: Evidence from South Africa," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 473-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naga Pillada & Sangeetha Rangasamy, 2023. "An empirical investigation of investor sentiment and volatility of realty sector market in India: an application of the DCC–GARCH model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Dhasmana, Samriddhi & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2023. "Does investor sentiment influence ESG stock performance? Evidence from India," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    3. Fabian Moodley & Sune Ferreira-Schenk & Kago Matlhaku, 2024. "Effect of Market-Wide Investor Sentiment on South African Government Bond Indices of Varying Maturities under Changing Market Conditions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Emrah İ. Çevik & Turhan Korkmaz & Erdal Atukeren, 2012. "Business confidence and stock returns in the USA: a time-varying Markov regime-switching model," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 299-312, February.
    5. Sercan Demiralay & Erhan Kilincarslan, 2024. "Uncertainty Measures and Sector-Specific REITs in a Regime-Switching Environment," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 545-584, October.
    6. Bethke, Sebastian & Gehde-Trapp, Monika & Kempf, Alexander, 2015. "Investor sentiment, flight-to-quality, and corporate bond comovement," CFR Working Papers 13-06 [rev.3], University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    7. Hanna, Alan J., 2018. "A top-down approach to identifying bull and bear market states," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 93-110.
    8. Chen, Lemeng & Lazrak, Skander & Wang, Yan & Welch, Robert, 2019. "Pure momentum is priced," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 75-89.
    9. Hwang, Soosung & Rubesam, Alexandre, 2013. "A behavioral explanation of the value anomaly based on time-varying return reversals," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2367-2377.
    10. Bethke, Sebastian & Gehde-Trapp, Monika & Kempf, Alexander, 2017. "Investor sentiment, flight-to-quality, and corporate bond comovement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 112-132.
    11. Zheng, Yao, 2015. "The linkage between aggregate investor sentiment and metal futures returns: A nonlinear approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 128-142.
    12. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami, 2019. "Testing of binary regime switching models using squeeze duration analysis," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Carstensen, Kai & Heinrich, Markus & Reif, Magnus & Wolters, Maik H., 2020. "Predicting ordinary and severe recessions with a three-state Markov-switching dynamic factor model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 829-850.
    14. David Andolfatto & Paul Gomme, 2003. "Monetary Policy Regimes and Beliefs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(1), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Hendry, David F. & Clements, Michael P., 2003. "Economic forecasting: some lessons from recent research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 301-329, March.
    16. Perron, Pierre & Wada, Tatsuma, 2016. "Measuring business cycles with structural breaks and outliers: Applications to international data," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 281-303.
    17. Dash, Saumya Ranjan & Maitra, Debasish, 2018. "Does sentiment matter for stock returns? Evidence from Indian stock market using wavelet approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 32-39.
    18. Nemati, Mehdi & Saghaian, Sayed H., 2016. "Dynamics of Price Adjustment in Qualitatively Differentiated Markets in the U.S.: The Case of Organic and Conventional Apples," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229950, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Flavin, Thomas J. & Panopoulou, Ekaterini & Unalmis, Deren, 2008. "On the stability of domestic financial market linkages in the presence of time-varying volatility," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 280-301, December.
    20. Papapostolou, Nikos C. & Pouliasis, Panos K. & Nomikos, Nikos K. & Kyriakou, Ioannis, 2016. "Shipping investor sentiment and international stock return predictability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 81-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1568619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.