IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i12p203-d1545026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Instability and Financial Decisions: How Neuroticism Fuels Panic Selling

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan

    (School of Economics, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8525, Japan)

  • Hiroumi Yoshimura

    (AI Data & Human Lab, Rakuten Securities, Tokyo 107-0062, Japan)

  • Yoshihiko Kadoya

    (School of Economics, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8525, Japan)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between neuroticism and panic-selling behavior among investors, particularly during market downturns. Building on the theoretical framework of behavioral finance, we hypothesize that higher levels of neuroticism are positively associated with an increased likelihood of panic selling. The data for this research were derived from a comprehensive survey titled Survey on Life and Money , which was conducted by Rakuten Securities in collaboration with Hiroshima University in November and December 2023, with a total sample size of 189,524 participants. Our results reveal that 9.46% of the respondents fully or partially panic-sold their stocks during market volatility. Additionally, the respondents demonstrated a tendency toward neuroticism, with an average score of 2.95 out of 5 on the neuroticism scale. Using a probit regression analysis, we examined the dependent variable of panic selling in relation to neuroticism as the independent variable, controlling for various demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral characteristics. Our findings robustly support this hypothesis, indicating that individuals with higher neuroticism scores are more likely to engage in panic selling during periods of market volatility, with significance at the 5% level. This study contributes to the behavioral finance literature by highlighting the significant role of personality traits in investment decision making and underscores the importance of understanding investor psychology in financial markets. This study emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of how individual psychological factors, particularly neuroticism, drive market behavior and influence broader economic stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan & Hiroumi Yoshimura & Yoshihiko Kadoya, 2024. "Emotional Instability and Financial Decisions: How Neuroticism Fuels Panic Selling," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:203-:d:1545026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/12/203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/12/203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terrance Odean., 1996. "Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit When All Trader Are Above Average," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-266, University of California at Berkeley.
    2. Jiang, Zhengyang & Peng, Cameron & Yan, Hongjun, 2024. "Personality differences and investment decision-making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:1887-1934 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moore, Don A. & Cain, Daylian M., 2007. "Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 197-213, July.
    2. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.
    3. Philip A. Stork, 2011. "The intertemporal mechanics of European stock price momentum," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 217-232, August.
    4. Julio J. Rotemberg, 2010. "A Behavioral Model of Demandable Deposits and its Implications for Financial Regulation," NBER Working Papers 16620, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Herz, Holger & Schunk, Daniel & Zehnder, Christian, 2014. "How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Chan, Kalok & Covrig, Vicentiu, 2012. "What determines mutual fund trading in foreign stocks?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 793-817.
    7. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Fellner, Gerlinde & Maciejovsky, Boris, 2007. "Risk attitude and market behavior: Evidence from experimental asset markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 338-350, June.
    9. Jonathan J Adams, 2023. "Equilibrium Determinacy With Behavioral Expectations," Working Papers 001008, University of Florida, Department of Economics.
    10. Etienne Farvaque & Norimichi Matsueda, 2017. "Optimal Term Length For An Overconfident Central Banker," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(01), pages 179-192, March.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11681 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kenneth Yung & Yen-Chih Liu, 2009. "Implications of futures trading volume: Hedgers versus speculators," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(5), pages 318-337, December.
    13. Peng, Lin & Xiong, Wei, 2006. "Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 563-602, June.
    14. Mamdouh Medhat & Maik Schmeling, 2022. "Short-term Momentum," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(3), pages 1480-1526.
    15. Yosef Bonaparte & Russell Cooper & Mengli Sha, 2019. "Rationalizing Trading Frequency and Returns: Maybe Trading is Good for You," NBER Working Papers 25838, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Sinclair Davidson & Vikash Ramiah, 2010. "The Information-Adjusted Noise Model: Theory and Evidence from the Australian Stock Market," Chapters, in: Brian Bruce (ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Finance, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Elina Pradkhan, 2016. "Information Content of Trading Activity in Precious Metals Futures Markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 421-456, May.
    18. Leković Milјan, 2020. "Cognitive Biases as an Integral Part of Behavioral Finance," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 75-96, March.
    19. Thomas Philippon, 2015. "Has the US Finance Industry Become Less Efficient? On the Theory and Measurement of Financial Intermediation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1408-1438, April.
    20. Gemayel, Roland & Preda, Alex, 2021. "Performance and learning in an ambiguous environment: A study of cryptocurrency traders," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    21. Silvina M. Cabrini & Scott H. Irwin & Darrel L. Good, 2007. "Style and Performance of Agricultural Market Advisory Services," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(3), pages 607-623.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:203-:d:1545026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.