IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i5p92-d1147385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Mitigation in Agriculture in Support of COVID-19 Crisis Management

Author

Listed:
  • Boris M. Leybert

    (Higher School of Information and Social Technologies, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, 450064 Ufa, Russia)

  • Oksana V. Shmaliy

    (Institute of Law and National Security, Faculty of Law Named after M.M. Speransky, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 117571 Moscow, Russia)

  • Zhanna V. Gornostaeva

    (Faculty of Economics, Service and Entrepreneurship, Don State Technical University, 344000 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Daria D. Mironova

    (Faculty of Economics, Service and Entrepreneurship, Don State Technical University, 344000 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

Abstract

The main focus of this article is the problem of exacerbating agricultural risks in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, which started against the background of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The motivation for conducting the research presented in this article was the desire to increase the resilience of agricultural companies to economic crises. This paper is aimed at studying the Russian experience of changing the production and financial risks of agricultural companies during the COVID-19 crisis, substantiating the important role of innovations in reducing these risks, and determining the prospects for risk management in agriculture based on innovations to increase its crisis resilience. Using the structural equation modelling (SEM) method, we modelled the contribution of innovations to the risk management of agriculture during the COVID-19 crisis. The advantages of the SEM method, compared to other conventional methods (e.g., independent correlation analysis or independent regression analysis), include the increased depth of analysis, its systemic character, and the consideration of multilateral connections between the indicators. Using the case-study method, a “smart” vertical farm framework is being developed, the risks of which are resistant to crises through the use of datasets and machine learning. The originality of this article lies in rethinking the risks of agriculture from the standpoint of “smart” technologies as a new risk factor and a way to increase resilience to crises. The theoretical significance of the results obtained is that they make it possible to systematically study the changes in the risks of agriculture in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, while outlining the prospects for increasing resilience to crises based on optimising the use of “smart” technologies. The practical significance of the article is related to the fact that the authors’ conclusions and applied recommendations on the use of datasets and machine learning by agricultural companies can improve the efficiency of agricultural risk management and ensure successful COVID-19 crisis management by agricultural companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris M. Leybert & Oksana V. Shmaliy & Zhanna V. Gornostaeva & Daria D. Mironova, 2023. "Risk Mitigation in Agriculture in Support of COVID-19 Crisis Management," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-36, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:92-:d:1147385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/5/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erick C. Jones & Benjamin D. Leibowicz, 2022. "Climate risk management in agriculture using alternative electricity and water resources: a stochastic programming framework," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 117-135, March.
    2. Roman Dorczak & Marzanna Farnicka & Inetta Nowosad, 2021. "Dilemmas in Managing the COVID-19 Crisis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, April.
    3. The Anh Luu & An Thinh Nguyen & Quoc Anh Trinh & Van Tuan Pham & Ba Bien Le & Duc Thanh Nguyen & Quoc Nam Hoang & Ha T.T. Pham & The Kien Nguyen & Van Nang Luu & Luc Hens, 2019. "Farmers’ Intention to Climate Change Adaptation in Agriculture in the Red River Delta Biosphere Reserve (Vietnam): A Combination of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Protection Motivation Theory ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Arnaud Reynaud & Aymeric Ricome, 2022. "Marketing contract choices in agriculture: The role of price expectation and price risk management," Post-Print hal-03602696, HAL.
    5. Aymeric Ricome & Arnaud Reynaud, 2022. "Marketing contract choices in agriculture: The role of price expectation and price risk management," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 170-186, January.
    6. Yohanes Kuleh & Zainal Ilmi & M. Amin Kadafi, 2022. "The Intensity of Agriculture in the Covid-19 from Indonesia – A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(2), pages 94-104, 04-2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna Freudenreich & Sindu W. Kebede, 2022. "Experience of shocks, household wealth and expectation formation: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 756-774, September.
    2. Daniel May & Ourania Tremma, 2023. "Effects of Sustainable Regulations at Agricultural International Market Failures: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Aleksander Grzelak & Jakub Staniszewski & Michał Borychowski, 2020. "Income or Assets—What Determines the Approach to the Environment among Farmers in A Region in Poland?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Rodríguez-Cruz, Luis Alexis & Niles, Meredith, 2020. "Puerto Rican Farmers' Psychological Awareness of Climate Change, and Adaptation Perceptions after Hurricane Maria," SocArXiv e27k4, Center for Open Science.
    5. Mauro Francini & Lucia Chieffallo & Annunziata Palermo & Maria Francesca Viapiana, 2020. "A Method for the Definition of Local Vulnerability Domains to Climate Change and Relate Mapping. Two Case Studies in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Irina Gabriela RĂDULESCU & Irina BARBU (SIMIONESCU) & George ENESCU, 2020. "The Interaction Between Risks And Vulnerabilities In Romanian Agriculture And Its Impact On Agricultural Entrepreneurs," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 23, pages 205-220, August.
    7. Ojo, Temitope & Adetoro, Adetoso A. & Ogundeji, Abiodun A. & Belle, Johannes A., 2021. "Quantifying the Determinants of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies and Farmers’ Access to Credit in South Africa," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315853, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Hoang Ha Vo & Takeshi Mizunoya & Cong Dinh Nguyen, 2021. "Determinants of farmers’ adaptation decisions to climate change in the central coastal region of Vietnam," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 327-349, June.
    9. Valeriy Kozytskyy & Marianna Oliskevych & Galyna Beregova & Nelya Pabyrivska, 2023. "Output and Energy Prices Fluctuations in Response to Market Shocks: System Dynamic Modeling," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 462-466, March.
    10. Mahfuza Begum & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Lubna Alam & Mazlin Bin Mokhtar & Ahmad Aldrie Amir, 2022. "The Adaptation Behaviour of Marine Fishermen towards Climate Change and Food Security: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Health Belief Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Ma. Daniella M. Sobrevilla, 2023. "Determining Factors Affecting the Protective Behavior of Filipinos in Urban Areas for Natural Calamities Using an Integration of Protection Motivation Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Ergonomic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Samane Ghazali & Hossein Azadi & Alishir Kurban & Nicolae Ajtai & Marcin Pietrzykowski & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Determinants of farmers’ adaptation decisions under changing climate: the case of Fars province in Iran," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Madalyn Baldwin & Andrew Fox & Travis Klondike & Meredith Hovis & Theodore Shear & Lauren Joca & Megan Hester & Frederick Cubbage, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis and Land Suitability for “FloodWise” Practices: Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation in Eastern, Rural North Carolina," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Zobeidi, Tahereh & Yaghoubi, Jafar & Yazdanpanah, Masoud, 2022. "Farmers’ incremental adaptation to water scarcity: An application of the model of private proactive adaptation to climate change (MPPACC)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:92-:d:1147385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.