IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v7y2018i3p48-d162536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay I. Didenko

    (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Yuri S. Klochkov

    (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Djamilia F. Skripnuk

    (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)

Abstract

In the present article, the main principles of the circular economy are outlined in contradistinction with the existing and traditional linear economic model. An econometric model describing the influence of the linear economy on the environment is presented. The environment is characterized by seven key processes: change in global temperature; emissions of greenhouse gases from industry to the environment; emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture to the environment; CO 2 emissions into the environment; depletion of fresh water supplies; reduction of forest cover; and economic damage from climatological disasters. The model describing the impact of the traditional linear economy on the environment consists of seven interdependent econometric equations, each comprising an autoregressive distributed lag (ADL)-model. The proposed econometric model is used to analyze the environmental effects of the present linear economy. Methodological provisions for a transformational transition of the traditional linear economic model to the closed-loop systems, which also permit the impact of the closed-loop systems on the environment to be analyzed, are set out. Seven ecological indicators are proposed as criteria for comparing the traditional linear economy and the closed-loop systems. The manuscript presents a new approach for the determination of ecological criteria for comparing linear and circular economies. The results of the study could be interesting to address circular processes, which can be used as a criterion to establish ecological management according to the status of natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay I. Didenko & Yuri S. Klochkov & Djamilia F. Skripnuk, 2018. "Ecological Criteria for Comparing Linear and Circular Economies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:48-:d:162536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/3/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/3/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Larisa Ivascu & Elena Cristina Rada & Vincenzo Torretta & Gabriela Ionescu, 2015. "Sustainable Development and Technological Impact on CO 2 Reducing Conditions in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    3. Balint Horvath & Edmund Mallinguh & Csaba Fogarassy, 2018. "Designing Business Solutions for Plastic Waste Management to Enhance Circular Transitions in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Bilgili, Faik & Koçak, Emrah & Bulut, Ümit & Kuşkaya, Sevda, 2017. "Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 830-845.
    5. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    6. May, Gökan & Stahl, Bojan & Taisch, Marco, 2016. "Energy management in manufacturing: Toward eco-factories of the future – A focus group study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 628-638.
    7. Alexander Gelfan & David Gustafsson & Yury Motovilov & Berit Arheimer & Andrey Kalugin & Inna Krylenko & Alexander Lavrenov, 2017. "Climate change impact on the water regime of two great Arctic rivers: modeling and uncertainty issues," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 499-515, April.
    8. Chimeli, Ariaster B. & Braden, John B., 2009. "A capital scarcity theory of the environmental Kuznets curve," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(5), pages 541-564, October.
    9. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    10. McCONNELL, KENNETH E., 1997. "Income and the demand for environmental quality," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 383-399, July.
    11. Richard T. Carson, 2010. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(1), pages 3-23, Winter.
    12. Bidisha Lahiri, 2017. "Dissimilar Relations Between Income and Environmental Quality for Open Economies in a Growth Model," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(1), pages 104-127, January.
    13. Lopez Ramon, 1994. "The Environment as a Factor of Production: The Effects of Economic Growth and Trade Liberalization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 163-184, September.
    14. Andreoni, James & Levinson, Arik, 2001. "The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 269-286, May.
    15. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    16. Stokey, Nancy L, 1998. "Are There Limits to Growth?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-31, February.
    17. Martins, Nuno Ornelas, 2018. "The Classical Circular Economy, Sraffian Ecological Economics and the Capabilities Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 38-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iuliia Plastinina & Lyudmila Teslyuk & Nataliya Dukmasova & Elena Pikalova, 2019. "Implementation of Circular Economy Principles in Regional Solid Municipal Waste Management: The Case of Sverdlovskaya Oblast (Russian Federation)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Anastasia O. Ljovkina & David L. Dusseault & Olga V. Zaharova & Yury Klochkov, 2019. "Managing Innovation Resources in Accordance with Sustainable Development Ethics: Typological Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Elena-Simina Lakatos & Andreea-Loredana Birgovan, 2022. "Consumers in the Circular Economy: A Path Analysis of the Underlying Factors of Purchasing Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Pavel Konyukhovskiy & Victoria Holodkova & Aleksander Titov, 2019. "Modeling Competition between Countries in the Development of Arctic Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Nikolay Didenko & Djamilia Skripnuk & Viktor Merkulov & Kseniia N. Kikkas & Konstantin Skripniuk, 2023. "Methodology for the Formation of a Digital Model of the Life Cycle of an Offshore Oil and Gas Platform," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Josephine Aboagyewaa-Ntiri, 2024. "Advancing Sustainability in Fashion Accessories: a Circular Economy Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1133-1151, June.
    7. Nikolay Egorov & Tatiana Pospelova & Anastasia Yarygina & Elena Klochkova, 2019. "The Assessment of Innovation Development in the Arctic Regions of Russia Based on the Triple Helix Model," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Yury Boldyrev & Sergey Chernogorskiy & Konstantin Shvetsov & Anatoly Zherelo & Konstantin Kostin, 2019. "A Mathematical Model of Regional Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Arctic Zone," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin & Dahlan Abdullah & Amir Imran Zainoddin & Rafeah Legino & Preecha Wararatchai, 2024. "The Evolution of Circular Economy: A Literature Review on Sustainability Transitions and Challenges," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(10), pages 102-115, October.
    10. Galychyn, Oleksandr, 2022. "Towards sustainable cities: A multi-criteria assessment framework for studying urban metabolism," MPRA Paper 121584, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 May 2022.
    11. Pavel Poletskov & Marina Gushchina & Marina Polyakova & Daniil Alekseev & Olga Nikitenko & Dmitrii Chukin & Yuri Vasil’ev, 2019. "Development of Alloyed Pipe Steel Composition for Oil and Gas Production in the Arctic Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esteve, Vicente & Tamarit, Cecilio, 2012. "Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO2 and income: The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1857–2007," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2148-2156.
    2. Pascalau, Razvan & Qirjo, Dhimitri, 2017. "TTIP and the Environmental Kuznets Curve," MPRA Paper 80192, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. M. Scott Taylor & William A. Brock, "undated". "The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth," Working Papers 2014-70, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 29 Sep 2014.
    4. Sweidan, Osama D. & Alwaked, Ahmed A., 2016. "Economic development and the energy intensity of human well-being: Evidence from the GCC countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1363-1369.
    5. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    6. Halkos, George, 2011. "Economy - environment relationship: The case of sulphur emissions," MPRA Paper 45480, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jaeger, William K. & Kolpin, Van & Siegel, Ryan, 2023. "The environmental Kuznets curve reconsidered," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Carson, Richard T, 2009. "Searching for Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure: The Environmental Kuznets Curve," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4m6263c2, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    9. Halkos, George, 2011. "Environment and economic development: determinants of an EKC hypothesis," MPRA Paper 33262, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Simone Marsiglio & Alberto Ansuategi & Maria Carmen Gallastegui, 2016. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Structural Change Hypothesis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(2), pages 265-288, February.
    11. Bidisha Lahiri, 2017. "Dissimilar Relations Between Income and Environmental Quality for Open Economies in a Growth Model," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(1), pages 104-127, January.
    12. Roxana Pincheira & Felipe Zuniga, 2021. "Environmental Kuznets curve bibliographic map: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1931-1956, April.
    13. Stern, David I., 2004. "The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1419-1439, August.
    14. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    15. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    16. William Brock & M. Taylor, 2010. "The Green Solow model," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 127-153, June.
    17. Richard T. Carson, 2010. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(1), pages 3-23, Winter.
    18. Sushama Murty, 2014. "On the environmental Kuznets curve with fossil-fuel induced emission: Theory and some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1406, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    19. Brännlund, Runar & Ghalwash, Tarek, 2006. "The income-pollution relationship and the role of income distribution Evidence from Swedish household data," Umeå Economic Studies 677, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    20. Sabuj Kumar Mandal & Devleena Chakravarty, 2017. "Role of energy in estimating turning point of Environmental Kuznets Curve: an econometric analysis of the existing studies," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 19(2), pages 387-401, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:48-:d:162536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.