IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i7p66-d862715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment for Mine Closure and Repurposing Alternatives in Colorado, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Cansu Perdeli Demirkan

    (Mining Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Nicole M. Smith

    (Mining Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Sebnem Duzgun

    (Mining Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

Abstract

Responsible mine closure and repurposing are key to contributing to sustainable development by ensuring successful environmental rehabilitation and reducing socioeconomic risks. However, mine closure has primarily focused on remediation and rehabilitation of mined lands with limited consideration of stakeholder perspectives and the broader social, economic, and cultural impacts of closure. In this paper, we use stakeholder input to evaluate and compare three different repurposing alternatives for the tailings dam area of a mine in the state of Colorado, USA, which is expected to close in the next twenty years. By using multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT), we determine which alternative better reflects stakeholder preferences and results in the most economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable outcome. Our results show that although stakeholder groups have different ideas about what constitutes sustainable development in the context of mine closure and repurposing, it is possible to identify to what extent different scenarios can address these perspectives. We argue that integrating stakeholder views into mine closure design and repurposing can lead to more responsible and sustainable mine closure that is unique to a particular setting and stakeholder needs, and we provide a methodology that mining companies may use to understand stakeholder priorities and preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Cansu Perdeli Demirkan & Nicole M. Smith & Sebnem Duzgun, 2022. "A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment for Mine Closure and Repurposing Alternatives in Colorado, USA," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:66-:d:862715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/7/66/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/7/66/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bainton, Nicholas & Holcombe, Sarah, 2018. "A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 468-478.
    2. Sinan Erzurumlu, S. & Erzurumlu, Yaman O., 2015. "Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 6-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gholami, Alireza & Tokac, Batur & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Measham, Thomas & Walker, Jim & Haslam McKenzie, Fiona & Kirby, Jason & Williams, Caroline & D'Urso, Jillian & Littleboy, Anna & Samper, Agnes & Rey, Rebecca & Maybee, Bryan & Brereton, David & Boggs,, 2024. "Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Pactwa & Justyna Woźniak & Michał Dudek, 2020. "Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Agung Dwi Sutrisno & Yun-Ju Chen & I Wayan Koko Suryawan & Chun-Hung Lee, 2023. "Building a Community’s Adaptive Capacity for Post-Mining Plans Based on Important Performance Analysis: Case Study from Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Wang, Di & Shen, Ye & Zhao, Yueying & He, Wei & Liu, Xue & Qian, Xiangyan & Lv, Tao, 2020. "Integrated assessment and obstacle factor diagnosis of China's scientific coal production capacity based on the PSR sustainability framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Hanbin Liu & Yujing Yang & Wenting Jiao & Shaobin Wang & Fangqin Cheng, 2022. "A New Assessment Method for the Redevelopment of Closed Coal Mine—A Case Study in Shanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Gholami, Alireza & Tokac, Batur & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. V. L. Morgan & E. S. McLamore & M. Correll & G. A. Kiker, 2021. "Emerging mercury mitigation solutions for artisanal small-scale gold mining communities evaluated through a multicriteria decision analysis approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 413-424, September.
    10. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Sesele, Kentse & Marais, Lochner & van Rooyen, Deidre, 2021. "Women and mine closure: A case study of policy in South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Kuo-Jui Wu & Ching-Jong Liao & Ming-Lang Tseng & Pei-Jay Chou, 2015. "Understanding Innovation for Sustainable Business Management Capabilities and Competencies under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-35, October.
    13. Emeka Ndaguba & Lochner Marais, 2024. "A scientometric analysis of mine closure research," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27787-27803, November.
    14. Bainton, Nicholas & Owen, John R. & Kenema, Simon & Burton, John, 2020. "Land, labour and capital: Small and large-scale miners in Papua New Guinea," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Aleksandr Rakhmangulov & Konstantin Burmistrov & Nikita Osintsev, 2021. "Sustainable Open Pit Mining and Technical Systems: Concept, Principles, and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Catherine Macdonald, 2017. "The role of participation in sustainable community development programmes in the extractives industries," WIDER Working Paper Series 028, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Bui, Nuong Thi & Kawamura, Akira & Kim, Kyoung Woong & Prathumratana, Lunchakorn & Kim, Tae-Heok & Yoon, Suk-Ho & Jang, Min & Amaguchi, Hideo & Bui, Duong Du & Truong, Ngoc Tu, 2017. "Proposal of an indicator-based sustainability assessment framework for the mining sector of APEC economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 405-417.
    18. Sanchita Bansal & Isha Garg & Gagan Deep Sharma, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship as a Path for Social Change and Driver of Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Stefanie Streit & Michael Tost & Katharina Gugerell, 2023. "Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Kamila Svobodova & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Vítězslav Moudrý & Éléonore Lèbre & Martin Stringer & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2022. "Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:66-:d:862715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.