IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v10y2021i2p16-d498538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Slávka Gałaś

    (Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, Provision of Mineral Policy, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Krakow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Gałaś

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, Provision of Mineral Policy, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Krakow, Poland)

  • Julián Kondela

    (Institute of Geosciences, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Blažena Wertichová

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 70800 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Mineral deposits are essential for the economic, technological and social development. However, to enable them to play an appropriate role in the process of sustainable development, they need to be safeguarded in a comprehensive and systemic manner in the same measure as other elements of the environment. The practice of securing access to areas where the mineral deposits can be found is based on the statement that they can be extracted only in places where they occur. This fact defines the type and scope of instruments for safeguarding prospective deposit areas of minerals and their documented deposits. These issues gained in significance in the EU level in recent years however views on this subject across the Member States still vary. The paper subjects instruments of mineral deposit safeguarding used in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia to the analysis and multi-criteria comparative assessment. It recommends their division into the conceptual, legal, spatial planning and economic ones. As a result of studies, similarities and differences in the approach to mineral deposit safeguarding in individual countries are shown, indicating good practices and suggesting possible changes. The analysis revealed many analogies in actions aimed at mineral deposit safeguarding in individual countries, however the assessment of their effectiveness and implementation points at the necessity of taking further steps to increase deposit safeguarding.

Suggested Citation

  • Slávka Gałaś & Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska & Andrzej Gałaś & Julián Kondela & Blažena Wertichová, 2021. "Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-38, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:16-:d:498538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/2/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/2/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiess, Guenter, 2010. "Minerals policy in Europe: Some recent developments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 190-198, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Gałaś, Andrzej & Kot-Niewiadomska, Alicja & Simić, Vladimir & Tost, Michael & Wårell, Linda & Gałaś, Slávka, 2023. "A comparative case-study on social and public administration aspects on mineral deposits safeguarding in chosen European countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    3. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2023. "How can shares be increased for indigenous peoples in state rights paid by mining companies? An education incentive through direct contribution to the people," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauli Lappi & Markku Ollikainen, 2019. "Optimal Environmental Policy for a Mine Under Polluting Waste Rocks and Stock Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(1), pages 133-158, May.
    2. Jiang, Meihui & An, Haizhong & Guan, Qing & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2018. "Global embodied mineral flow between industrial sectors: A network perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 192-201.
    3. Radwanek-Bąk, Barbara & Nieć, Marek, 2015. "Valorization of undeveloped industrial rock deposits in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 290-298.
    4. Daniel Constantin Diaconu & Paschalis D. Koutalakis & Georgios T. Gkiatas & Gabriel Vasile Dascalu & George N. Zaimes, 2023. "River Sand and Gravel Mining Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and UAVs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Ewa Lewicka & Katarzyna Guzik & Krzysztof Galos, 2021. "On the Possibilities of Critical Raw Materials Production from the EU’s Primary Sources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Henrik Florén & Johan Frishammar & Anton Löf & Magnus Ericsson, 2019. "Raw materials management in iron and steelmaking firms," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 39-47, April.
    7. Yufeng Chen & Biao Zheng, 2019. "What Happens after the Rare Earth Crisis: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Glöser, Simon & Tercero Espinoza, Luis & Gandenberger, Carsten & Faulstich, Martin, 2015. "Raw material criticality in the context of classical risk assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 35-46.
    9. R. Anthony Hodge & Magnus Ericsson & Olof Löf & Anton Löf & Paul Semkowich, 2022. "The global mining industry: corporate profile, complexity, and change," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 587-606, December.
    10. Nieć, Marek & Radwanek-Bąk, Barbara & Koźma, Jacek & Kozłowska, Olimpia, 2022. "Polish approach to the mineral deposits safeguarding. Experience and problems," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Nathalie Sick & Matthias Blug & Jens Leker, 2014. "The Influence of Raw Material Prices on the Development of Hydrogen Storage Materials: The Case of Metal Hydrides," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(4), pages 735-760, December.
    12. Radwanek-Bąk, Barbara & Sobczyk, Wiktoria & Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J., 2020. "Support for multiple criteria decisions for mineral deposits valorization and protection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Carvalho, Jorge & Galos, Krzysztof & Kot-Niewiadomska, Alicja & Gugerell, Katharina & Raaness, Agnes & Lisboa, Vitor, 2021. "A look at European practices for identifying mineral resources that deserve to be safeguarded in land-use planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Michael Tost & Gloria Ammerer & Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska & Katharina Gugerell, 2021. "Mining and Europe’s World Heritage Cultural Landscapes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Linda Wårell, 2021. "Mineral Deposits Safeguarding and Land Use Planning—The Importance of Creating Shared Value," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Nieć, Marek & Galos, Krzysztof & Szamałek, Krzysztof, 2014. "Main challenges of mineral resources policy of Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 93-103.
    17. Kasmaeeyazdi, Sara & Abdolmaleki, Mehdi & Ibrahim, Elsy & Jiang, Jingyi & Marzan, Ignacio & Rodríguez, Irene Benito, 2021. "Copernicus data to boost raw material source management: Illustrations from the RawMatCop programme," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Edyta Sermet & Marek Nieć, 2021. "Not Mining Sterilization of Explored Mineral Resources. The Example of Native Sulfur Deposits in Poland Case History," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Lopes, C. & Lisboa, V. & Carvalho, J. & Mateus, A. & Martins, L., 2018. "Challenges to access and safeguard mineral resources for society: A case study of kaolin in Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 263-284.
    20. Yi, Jiahui & Dai, Sheng & Cheng, Jinhua & Wu, Qiaosheng & Liu, Kailei, 2021. "Production quota policy in China: Implications for sustainable supply capacity of critical minerals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:16-:d:498538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.