IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v3y2023i1p7-130d1038230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Construction of the “Older Worker”

Author

Listed:
  • Hannes Zacher

    (Wilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Cort W. Rudolph

    (Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA)

Abstract

The notion of the “older worker” is frequently used in the organizational literature, in organizational practice, and in society, but so far, no research has investigated why people consider someone to be an older worker at a certain age. In the qualitative part of this study, we examined potential reasons for considering workers to be “older” at a certain age. In the quantitative part of this study, we investigated demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, education), job characteristics (i.e., job level, typical age in a job), and beliefs (i.e., perceived remaining time at work, motivation to continue working after retirement, positive and negative age stereotypes) as predictors of people’s conceptions of “older worker age”.” Data were provided by 269 employees from various jobs and organizations. The mean age at which participants considered someone to be an “older worker” was approximately 55 years. The most frequently stated reasons for considering workers to be “older” at a certain age were retirement age and age-related decline. Results of a regression analysis showed that participants’ age, sex, and perceived remaining time predicted “older worker age”. These findings provide first insights into the psychological construction of the “older worker”.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannes Zacher & Cort W. Rudolph, 2023. "The Construction of the “Older Worker”," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:7-130:d:1038230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/1/7/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/1/7/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison L. Chasteen & Norbert Schwarz & Denise C. Park, 2002. "The Activation of Aging Stereotypes in Younger and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 57(6), pages 540-547.
    2. Anne C. Bal & Abigail E. B. Reiss & Cort W. Rudolph & Boris B. Baltes, 2011. "Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 687-698.
    3. Dana Kotter-Grühn & Thomas M. Hess, 2012. "The Impact of Age Stereotypes on Self-perceptions of Aging Across the Adult Lifespan," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(5), pages 563-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liat Ayalon & Klaus Rothermund, 2018. "Examining the utility of national indicators of relative age disadvantage in Europe," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 189-197, June.
    2. Patricia Carral & Carlos-María Alcover, 2019. "Measuring Age Discrimination at Work: Spanish Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Nordic Age Discrimination Scale (NADS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Anne Cornelia Kroon & Damian Trilling & Martine Selm & Rens Vliegenthart, 2019. "Biased media? How news content influences age discrimination claims," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 109-119, March.
    4. Martin Söllner & Mirjam Dürnberger & Johannes Keller & Arnd Florack, 2022. "The Impact of Age Stereotypes on Well-being: Strategies of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation as Mediator and Regulatory Focus as Moderator: Findings from a Cross-Sectional and a Longitudinal S," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 635-665, February.
    5. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Arjan Heyma & Siemen Werff & Aukje Nauta & Guurtje Sloten, 2014. "What Makes Older Job-Seekers Attractive to Employers?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 397-414, December.
    7. A. E. Burton & S. E. Dean & W. Demeyin & J. Reeves, 2021. "Questionnaire measures of self-directed ageing stereotype in older adults: a systematic review of measurement properties," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-144, March.
    8. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, K., 2017. "Do Stereotypes about Older Workers Change? : Evidence from a Panel Study among Employers," Discussion Paper 2017-028, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    9. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2019. "Do stereotypes about older workers change? A panel study on changing attitudes of managers," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 535-550, December.
    10. Martina Gabrian & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2017. "Being slower, feeling older? Experimentally induced cognitive aging experiences have limited impact on subjective age," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 179-188, June.
    11. Terry Peak & Julie A. Gast, 2014. "Aging Men’s Health-Related Behaviors," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    12. van Dalen, H.P. & Henkens, C.J.I.M. & Schippers, J., 2009. "Unraveling the age-productivity nexus : Confronting perceptions of employers and employees," Discussion Paper 2009-4, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Dannii Y. Yeung & Helene H. Fung & Darius K.-S. Chan, 2015. "Positive Effect of Social Work—Related Values on Work Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Age and Work Situation," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(2), pages 233-244.
    14. Ehud Bodner & Liat Ayalon & Sharon Avidor & Yuval Palgi, 2017. "Accelerated increase and relative decrease in subjective age and changes in attitudes toward own aging over a 4-year period: results from the Health and Retirement Study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 17-27, March.
    15. Ye, Zihan & Post, Thomas, 2020. "What age do you feel? – Subjective age identity and economic behaviors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 322-341.
    16. Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Markus H. Schafer & Liat Ayalon, 2022. "Age integration in later life social networks and self-perceptions of aging: examining their reciprocal associations," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1145-1153, December.
    17. Hendrik P. Van Dalen & Kène Henkens & Joop Schippers, 2010. "Productivity of Older Workers: Perceptions of Employers and Employees," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 309-330, June.
    18. Justyna Stypinska & Konrad Turek, 2017. "Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 49-61, March.
    19. Pannhorst, Matthias & Dost, Florian, 2019. "Marketing innovations to old-age consumers: A dynamic Bass model for different life stages," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 315-327.
    20. Hui-Chuan Hsu, 2018. "Age Differences in Work Stress, Exhaustion, Well-Being, and Related Factors From an Ecological Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:7-130:d:1038230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.