IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i24p3157-d697181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Search for a Measure to Compare Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Díaz-Vázquez

    (Department of Statistics and O. R. and Department of Computer Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emilio Torres-Manzanera

    (Department of Statistics and O. R. and Department of Computer Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Irene Díaz

    (Department of Statistics and O. R. and Department of Computer Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Susana Montes

    (Department of Statistics and O. R. and Department of Computer Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Multiple definitions have been put forward in the literature to measure the differences between two interval-valued fuzzy sets. However, in most cases, the outcome is just a real value, although an interval could be more appropriate in this environment. This is the starting point of this contribution. Thus, we revisit the axioms that a measure of the difference between two interval-valued fuzzy sets should satisfy, paying special attention to the condition of monotonicity in the sense that the closer the intervals are, the smaller the measure of difference between them is. Its formalisation leads to very different concepts: distances, divergences and dissimilarities. We have proven that distances and divergences lead to contradictory properties for this kind of sets. Therefore, we conclude that dissimilarities are the only appropriate measures to measure the difference between two interval-valued fuzzy sets when the outcome is an interval.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Díaz-Vázquez & Emilio Torres-Manzanera & Irene Díaz & Susana Montes, 2021. "On the Search for a Measure to Compare Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:24:p:3157-:d:697181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/24/3157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/24/3157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moshe Sniedovich, 2008. "Wald's maximin model: a treasure in disguise!," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 9(3), pages 287-291, May.
    2. Jay K. Satia & Roy E. Lave, 1973. "Markovian Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Probabilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 728-740, June.
    3. Chong Wu & Peng Luo & Yongli Li & Xuekun Ren, 2014. "A New Similarity Measure of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Considering Its Hesitancy Degree and Applications in Expert Systems," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeynep Turgay & Fikri Karaesmen & Egemen Lerzan Örmeci, 2018. "Structural properties of a class of robust inventory and queueing control problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 699-716, December.
    2. Rasouli, Mohammad & Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Robust Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes," Working Paper Series rwp18-027, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Berç Rustem, 2010. "Robust Markov Decision Processes," Working Papers 034, COMISEF.
    4. Varagapriya, V & Singh, Vikas Vikram & Lisser, Abdel, 2024. "Rank-1 transition uncertainties in constrained Markov decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 167-178.
    5. M. Reza Skandari & Steven M. Shechter, 2021. "Patient-Type Bayes-Adaptive Treatment Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 574-598, March.
    6. Sebastian E. Ferrando & Alfredo L. Gonzalez & Ivan L. Degano & Massoome Rahsepar, 2014. "Discrete, Non Probabilistic Market Models. Arbitrage and Pricing Intervals," Papers 1407.1769, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2015.
    7. Nicholas J. J. Smith, 2023. "Acting on belief functions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 575-621, November.
    8. Blanc, J.P.C. & den Hertog, D., 2008. "On Markov Chains with Uncertain Data," Other publications TiSEM b44dfb0a-1676-4ce3-8d16-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. David L. Kaufman & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2013. "Robust Modified Policy Iteration," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 396-410, August.
    10. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    11. Erick Delage & Shie Mannor, 2010. "Percentile Optimization for Markov Decision Processes with Parameter Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 203-213, February.
    12. Garud N. Iyengar, 2005. "Robust Dynamic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 257-280, May.
    13. Moshe Sniedovich, 2010. "A bird's view of info-gap decision theory," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 268-283, May.
    14. D. Škulj & R. Hable, 2013. "Coefficients of ergodicity for Markov chains with uncertain parameters," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 107-133, January.
    15. Montes, Ignacio & Miranda, Enrique & Montes, Susana, 2014. "Decision making with imprecise probabilities and utilities by means of statistical preference and stochastic dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 209-220.
    16. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Berç Rustem, 2013. "Robust Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 153-183, February.
    17. A. Maron & M. Maron, 2019. "Minimizing the Maximum Risk of Currency Conversion for a Company Buying Abroad," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 59-67.
    18. V Varagapriya & Vikas Vikram Singh & Abdel Lisser, 2023. "Joint chance-constrained Markov decision processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 1013-1035, March.
    19. Zhu, Zhicheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhao, Ming & Shi, Yue, 2023. "Data-driven remanufacturing planning with parameter uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 102-116.
    20. Montes, Ignacio & Miranda, Enrique & Montes, Susana, 2014. "Stochastic dominance with imprecise information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 868-886.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:24:p:3157-:d:697181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.