IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hsgmed/202501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Causal Effects and Optimal Policy Learning for Intensive Care Unit Discharge Decisions to Solve Hospital Process Bottlenecks: Approach, Methods, and First Results

Author

Listed:
  • Vogel, Justus
  • Cordier, Johannes
  • Filipovic, Miodrag

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) operate with fixed capacities and face uncertainty such as demand variability, leading to demand-driven, early discharges to free up beds. These discharges can increase ICU readmission rates, negatively impacting patient outcomes and aggravating ICU bottleneck congestion. This study investigates how ICU discharge timing affects readmission risk, with the goal of developing policies that minimize ICU readmissions, managing demand variability and bed capacity. To define a binary treatment, we randomly assign hypothetical discharge days to patients, comparing these with actual discharge days to form intervention and control groups. We apply two causal machine learning techniques (generalized random forest, modified causal forest). Assuming unconfoundedness, we leverage observed patient data as sufficient covariates. For scenarios where unconfoundedness might fail, we discuss an IV approach with different instruments. We further develop decision policies based on individualized average treatment effects (IATEs) to minimize individual patients’ readmission risk. Our sample comprises 12,950 ICU stays (11,873 unique cases) from the Department of Surgical Intensive Medicine of the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen admitted between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2023. We find that for 72% of our sample discharge at point in time 𝑡 as compared to 𝑡+1 increases patients’ readmission risk. Vice versa, 28% of cases profit from an earlier discharge in terms of readmission risk. The range of IATEs is quite large: For 91.4% of ICU stays, an earlier ICU discharge changes a patient’s readmission risk between -0.05 and 0.05 percentage points (-55% and 55% relative change as compared to the average readmission rate of 9.04%). To develop decision policies, we will exploit this treatment heterogeneity and rank patients according to their IATEs and compare IATEs of optimal and actual discharges across all decision points in our observation period. Finally, we outline how we will assess the potential reduction in readmissions and saved bed capacities under optimal policies in a simulation, offering actionable insights for ICU management. We aim to provide a novel approach and blueprint for similar operations research and management science applications in data-rich environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Vogel, Justus & Cordier, Johannes & Filipovic, Miodrag, 2025. "Causal Effects and Optimal Policy Learning for Intensive Care Unit Discharge Decisions to Solve Hospital Process Bottlenecks: Approach, Methods, and First Results," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2025-01, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management, revised 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/308439.2/1/wps-2025-01_v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jochen Gönsch & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2021. "Managing admission and discharge processes in intensive care units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 666-685, December.
    2. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    3. Yao Cui & Andrew M. Davis, 2022. "Tax-Induced Inequalities in the Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7202-7220, October.
    4. Jie Bai & Andreas FĂĽgener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. J. K. Satia & R. E. Lave, 1973. "Markovian Decision Processes with Probabilistic Observation of States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Jay K. Satia & Roy E. Lave, 1973. "Markovian Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Probabilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 728-740, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanc, J.P.C. & den Hertog, D., 2008. "On Markov Chains with Uncertain Data," Other publications TiSEM b44dfb0a-1676-4ce3-8d16-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Erick Delage & Shie Mannor, 2010. "Percentile Optimization for Markov Decision Processes with Parameter Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 203-213, February.
    3. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Berç Rustem, 2013. "Robust Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 153-183, February.
    4. V Varagapriya & Vikas Vikram Singh & Abdel Lisser, 2023. "Joint chance-constrained Markov decision processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 1013-1035, March.
    5. Salah eddine Semati & Abdelkader Gasmi, 2023. "Markov interval chain (MIC) for solving a decision problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 802-811, June.
    6. Zeynep Turgay & Fikri Karaesmen & Egemen Lerzan Ă–rmeci, 2018. "Structural properties of a class of robust inventory and queueing control problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 699-716, December.
    7. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    8. Hyeong Chang, 2006. "Perfect information two-person zero-sum markov games with imprecise transition probabilities," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft fĂĽr Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(2), pages 335-351, October.
    9. Peter Buchholz & Dimitri Scheftelowitsch, 2019. "Computation of weighted sums of rewards for concurrent MDPs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft fĂĽr Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(1), pages 1-42, February.
    10. Arnab Nilim & Laurent El Ghaoui, 2005. "Robust Control of Markov Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Matrices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 780-798, October.
    11. Zeynep Turgay & Fikri Karaesmen & E. Ă–rmeci, 2015. "A dynamic inventory rationing problem with uncertain demand and production rates," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 207-228, August.
    12. Schapaugh, Adam W. & Tyre, Andrew J., 2013. "Accounting for parametric uncertainty in Markov decision processes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 15-21.
    13. Lechner, Michael, 2018. "Modified Causal Forests for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 12040, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. William Arbour, 2021. "Can Recidivism be Prevented from Behind Bars? Evidence from a Behavioral Program," Working Papers tecipa-683, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    15. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki & Rory B. Weiner, 2020. "Personalized treatment for coronary artery disease patients: a machine learning approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 482-506, December.
    16. Stephen Jarvis & Olivier Deschenes & Akshaya Jha, 2022. "The Private and External Costs of Germany’s Nuclear Phase-Out," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(3), pages 1311-1346.
    17. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Keola, Souknilanh & Silaphet, Korrakoun & Yamanouchi, Kenta, 2022. "Estimating the impacts of international bridges on foreign firm locations: a machine learning approach," IDE Discussion Papers 847, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    18. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    19. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    20. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Causal Machine Learning; Intensive Care Unit Management; Hospital Operations; Policy Learning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://med.unisg.ch/de/forschung/management-im-gesundheitswesen .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.