IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i20p2622-d658753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparable Studies of Financial Bankruptcy Prediction Using Advanced Hybrid Intelligent Classification Models to Provide Early Warning in the Electronics Industry

Author

Listed:
  • You-Shyang Chen

    (Department of Information Management, Hwa Hsia University of Technology, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Ku Lin

    (Department of Business Management, Hsiuping University of Science and Technology, Taichung City 412, Taiwan
    Department of Multimedia Game Development and Application, Hungkuang University, Taichung City 433304, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Min Lo

    (Department of Digital Multimedia Design, National Taipei University of Business, Taipei City 100025, Taiwan)

  • Su-Fen Chen

    (National Museum of Marine Science and Technology, Keelung City 202010, Taiwan)

  • Qi-Jun Liao

    (Department of Information Management, Hwa Hsia University of Technology, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan)

Abstract

In recent years in Taiwan, scholars who study financial bankruptcy have mostly focused on individual listed and over-the-counter (OTC) industries or the entire industry, while few have studied the independent electronics industry. Thus, this study investigated the application of an advanced hybrid Z-score bankruptcy prediction model in selecting financial ratios of listed companies in eight related electronics industries (semiconductor, computer, and peripherals, photoelectric, communication network, electronic components, electronic channel, information service, and other electronics industries) using data from 2000 to 2019. Based on 22 financial ratios of condition attributes and one decision attribute recommended and selected by experts and in the literature, this study used five classifiers for binary logistic regression analysis and in the decision tree. The experimental results show that for the Z-score model, samples analyzed using the five classifiers in five groups (1:1–5:1) of different ratios of companies, the bagging classifier scores are worse (40.82%) than when no feature selection method is used, while the logistic regression classifier and decision tree classifier (J48) result in better scores. However, it is significant that the bagging classifier score improved to over 90% after using the feature selection technique. In conclusion, it was found that the feature selection method can be effectively applied to improve the prediction accuracy, and three financial ratios (the liquidity ratio, debt ratio, and fixed assets turnover ratio) are identified as being the most important determinants affecting the prediction of financial bankruptcy in providing a useful reference for interested parties to evaluate capital allocation to avoid high investment risks.

Suggested Citation

  • You-Shyang Chen & Chien-Ku Lin & Chih-Min Lo & Su-Fen Chen & Qi-Jun Liao, 2021. "Comparable Studies of Financial Bankruptcy Prediction Using Advanced Hybrid Intelligent Classification Models to Provide Early Warning in the Electronics Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:20:p:2622-:d:658753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/20/2622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/20/2622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laetitia Lepetit & Frank Strobel & Thu Ha Tran, 2021. "An alternative Z-score measure for downside bank insolvency risk," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 137-142, January.
    2. Amirhosein Mosavi & Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini & Bahram Choubin & Massoud Goodarzi & Adrienn A. Dineva & Elham Rafiei Sardooi, 2021. "Ensemble Boosting and Bagging Based Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 23-37, January.
    3. Chen, Yuh-Jen & Liou, Wan-Ching & Chen, Yuh-Min & Wu, Jyun-Han, 2019. "Fraud detection for financial statements of business groups," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-23.
    4. Debelle, Guy, 2020. "The Reserve Bank of Australia’s policy actions and balance sheet," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 285-295.
    5. Claudio Albanese & Stéphane Crépey & Rodney Hoskinson & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2021. "XVA analysis from the balance sheet," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 99-123, January.
    6. Rungskunroch, Panrawee & Jack, Anson & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat, 2021. "Benchmarking on railway safety performance using Bayesian inference, decision tree and petri-net techniques based on long-term accidental data sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Kück, Mirko & Freitag, Michael, 2021. "Forecasting of customer demands for production planning by local k-nearest neighbor models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Sumaira Ashraf & Elisabete G. S. Félix & Zélia Serrasqueiro, 2019. "Do Traditional Financial Distress Prediction Models Predict the Early Warning Signs of Financial Distress?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Stewart Jones & David Johnstone & Roy Wilson, 2017. "Predicting Corporate Bankruptcy: An Evaluation of Alternative Statistical Frameworks," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1-2), pages 3-34, January.
    10. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    11. Michael E. Bradbury & Tom Scott, 2021. "What accounting standards were the cause of enforcement actions following IFRS adoption?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2247-2268, April.
    12. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy: A Discriminant Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 193-194, March.
    13. Ohlson, Ja, 1980. "Financial Ratios And The Probabilistic Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 109-131.
    14. Nagar, Neerav & Arya, Avinash, 2016. "Stewardship Value of Income Statement Classifications: An Empirical Examination," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-03-27, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Jones, Stewart & Johnstone, David & Wilson, Roy, 2015. "An empirical evaluation of the performance of binary classifiers in the prediction of credit ratings changes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 72-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yen-Chang Chen & Ying-Sing Liu, 2023. "Market Efficiency and Stock Investment Loss Aversion Guide During COVID-19 Pandemic Events: The Case for Applying Data Mining," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Jarmila Horváthová & Martina Mokrišová & Martin Bača, 2023. "Bankruptcy Prediction for Sustainability of Businesses: The Application of Graph Theoretical Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumaira Ashraf & Elisabete G. S. Félix & Zélia Serrasqueiro, 2019. "Do Traditional Financial Distress Prediction Models Predict the Early Warning Signs of Financial Distress?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Stewart Jones, 2017. "Corporate bankruptcy prediction: a high dimensional analysis," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1366-1422, September.
    3. Ahmed, Shamima & Alshater, Muneer M. & Ammari, Anis El & Hammami, Helmi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Ashraf, Sumaira & Félix, Elisabete G.S. & Serrasqueiro, Zélia, 2020. "Development and testing of an augmented distress prediction model: A comparative study on a developed and an emerging market," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 57.
    5. Mohammad S. Uddin & Guotai Chi & Mazin A. M. Al Janabi & Tabassum Habib, 2022. "Leveraging random forest in micro‐enterprises credit risk modelling for accuracy and interpretability," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3713-3729, July.
    6. Alberto Tron & Maurizio Dallocchio & Salvatore Ferri & Federico Colantoni, 2023. "Corporate governance and financial distress: lessons learned from an unconventional approach," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 425-456, June.
    7. Chien-Min Kang & Ming-Chieh Wang & Lin Lin, 2022. "Financial Distress Prediction of Cooperative Financial Institutions—Evidence for Taiwan Credit Unions," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Alam, Nurul & Gao, Junbin & Jones, Stewart, 2021. "Corporate failure prediction: An evaluation of deep learning vs discrete hazard models," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Jones, Stewart & Wang, Tim, 2019. "Predicting private company failure: A multi-class analysis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 161-188.
    10. Oz, Ibrahim Onur & Yelkenci, Tezer & Meral, Gorkem, 2021. "The role of earnings components and machine learning on the revelation of deteriorating firm performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Singh, Manish K. & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "Do decreases in Distance-to-Default predict rating downgrades?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Mark Clintworth & Dimitrios Lyridis & Evangelos Boulougouris, 2023. "Financial risk assessment in shipping: a holistic machine learning based methodology," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 90-121, March.
    14. Abinzano, Isabel & Gonzalez-Urteaga, Ana & Muga, Luis & Sanchez, Santiago, 2020. "Performance of default-risk measures: the sample matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Tyler Pike & Horacio Sapriza & Tom Zimmermann, 2019. "Bottom-up Leading Macroeconomic Indicators: An Application to Non-Financial Corporate Defaults using Machine Learning," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-070, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    16. Misankova Maria & Zvarikova Katarina & Kliestikova Jana, 2017. "Bankruptcy Practice in Countries of Visegrad Four," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 108-118, June.
    17. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Singh, Manish K. & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "Do decreases in Distance-to-Default predict rating downgrades?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Serhiy Zabolotnyy & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2019. "The Concept of Financial Sustainability Measurement: A Case of Food Companies from Northern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Rastin Matin & Casper Hansen & Christian Hansen & Pia M{o}lgaard, 2018. "Predicting Distresses using Deep Learning of Text Segments in Annual Reports," Papers 1811.05270, arXiv.org.
    20. Sigrist, Fabio & Hirnschall, Christoph, 2019. "Grabit: Gradient tree-boosted Tobit models for default prediction," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 177-192.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:20:p:2622-:d:658753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.