IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i17p2147-d628480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching Opinions and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students: Analysis of 4 Students’ Profiles. A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gádor Indra Hidalgo

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Av. Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo

    (University Research Institute for Sustainability Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Campus Nord, c/Jordi Girona 31, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Daniel Romero-Portillo

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. Utrera, km. 1., 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

Distance learning due to the COVID-19 lockdown, commonly called emergency remote teaching (ERT), substantially changed the methodology of teaching and possibly students’ perceptions of the quality of lectures. Students’ opinions should be collected and analyzed jointly with other data such as academic performance to assess the effect of this pandemic on learning. A 20-question, 4-point Likert scale specific questionnaire was designed and validated twice by a panel of experts. The survey was sent to the 365 industrial engineering undergraduate students enrolled in a chemistry course. Responses ( n = 233) and academic data were collected, and four student profiles were identified by using the k-means cluster analysis technique: ‘The Lucky’, ‘The Passive’, ‘The Autonomous Learner’ and ‘The Harmed’. Students experienced the ERT differently according to their profile. Undergraduates who were better autonomous learners excelled in academic performance and were more participative in the survey. In general, students preferred face-to-face classes over distance learning. Undergraduates’ learning has been impaired due to the circumstances. However, contrary to their beliefs, the situation has benefited them with respect to grades when comparing their performance with students from previous years. Discovering what challenges students faced to adapt to the situation is key to giving students tools to grow as autonomous learners and to enable educators to apply tailored teaching techniques to improve the quality of lectures and enhance student satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Gádor Indra Hidalgo & Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & Daniel Romero-Portillo, 2021. "COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching Opinions and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students: Analysis of 4 Students’ Profiles. A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2147-:d:628480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Bischof, 2017. "New graphic schemes for Stata: plotplain and plottig," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 17(3), pages 748-759, September.
    2. Julen Izagirre-Olaizola & Jon Morandeira-Arca, 2020. "Business Management Teaching-Learning Processes in Times of Pandemic: Flipped Classroom at A Distance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. María Elena Parra-González & Jesús López Belmonte & Adrián Segura-Robles & Arturo Fuentes Cabrera, 2020. "Active and Emerging Methodologies for Ubiquitous Education: Potentials of Flipped Learning and Gamification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Natacha Borgers & Dirk Sikkel & Joop Hox, 2004. "Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 17-33, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julen Izagirre-Olaizola & Jon Morandeira-Arca, 2020. "Business Management Teaching-Learning Processes in Times of Pandemic: Flipped Classroom at A Distance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Goodwill, Janelle R., 2022. "Which coping strategies moderate the depression-suicide ideation link in Black college students? A psychometric investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. David Roodman, 2022. "Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Comment," Papers 2207.09036, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    4. Dickerson, Andy & Ratcliffe, Anita & Rohenkohl, Bertha & Van de Sijpe, Nicolas, 2024. "Anticipated labour market discrimination and educational achievement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 375-393.
    5. Heleen van der Meulen & Rinaldo Kühne & Suzanna J. Opree, 2018. "Validating the Material Values Scale for Children (MVS-c) for Use in Early Childhood," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1201-1216, August.
    6. Fernando Lara-Lara & María Jesús Santos-Villalba & Blanca Berral-Ortiz & José Antonio Martínez-Domingo, 2023. "Inclusive Active Methodologies in Spanish Higher Education during the Pandemic," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Gonzalez, Robert & Komisarow, Sarah, 2020. "Community monitoring and crime: Evidence from Chicago's Safe Passage Program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Carter, Patrick & Van de Sijpe, Nicolas & Calel, Raphael, 2021. "The elusive quest for additionality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Timm Betz & Amy Pond & Weiwen Yin, 2021. "Investment agreements and the fragmentation of firms across countries," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 755-791, October.
    10. Steffen Hurka & Maximilian Haag, 2020. "Policy complexity and legislative duration in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 87-108, March.
    11. Santiago Pozo Sánchez & Jesús López-Belmonte & Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & José María Sola Reche & Arturo Fuentes Cabrera, 2020. "Effect of Bring-Your-Own-Device Program on Flipped Learning in Higher Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Joshua Budlender & Amina Ebrahim, 2021. "Estimating employment responses to South Africa's Employment Tax Incentive," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-118, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Mohammed A. A. Abulela & Mustafa Ali Khalaf, 2024. "Does the Number of Response Categories Impact Validity Evidence in Self-Report Measures? A Scoping Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    14. David Roodman, 2024. "The Arrival of Fast Internet and Employment in Africa: Comment," Papers 2401.13694, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    15. Rasmus Riad & Mara Westling Allodi & Eva Siljehag & Carina Wikman & Tamsin Ford & Sven Bölte, 2021. "How I Feel About My School—Adaptation and Validation of an Educational Well-Being Measure among Young Children in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Toepoel, V. & Dillman, D.A., 2008. "Words, Numbers and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys : Is there a Hierarchy of Importance?," Other publications TiSEM 21fbcc01-3c5d-4942-b41c-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Ursula Daxecker, 2020. "Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 156-170, January.
    18. Peterson, Lauri & Skovgaard, Jakob, 2019. "Bureaucratic politics and the allocation of climate finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 72-97.
    19. Toepoel, V. & Das, J.W.M. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2006. "Design of Web Questionnaires : The Effect of Layout in Rating Scales," Discussion Paper 2006-30, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Diersch Nadine & Walther Eva, 2016. "The Impact of Question Format, Context, and Content on Survey Answers in Early and Late Adolescence," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 307-328, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2147-:d:628480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.