IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i10p1787-d428434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating an Asset Health Index into a Life Cycle Costing: A Proposition and Study Case

Author

Listed:
  • Orlando Durán

    (Mechanical Engineering School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 243000, Chile)

  • Fabián Orellana

    (GNL Quintero, Las Condes, Santiago 2490000, Chile)

  • Pablo Perez

    (Mechanical Engineering School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 243000, Chile)

  • Tamara Hidalgo

    (Mechanical Engineering School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 243000, Chile)

Abstract

A physical asset’s health is the consequence of a series of factors, ranging from the characteristics of the location where it operates to the care it is submitted to. These characteristics can influence the durability or the horizon of the useful life of any equipment, as well as determine its operational performance and its failure rates in the future. Therefore, the assessment of the influence of asset health on Life Cycle Costs is a compelling need. This paper proposes the incorporation of a factor that reflects the projected behavior of an asset’s health index into its corresponding Life Cycle Costing (LCC) model. This allows cost estimates to be made more realistic and LCC models to be operated more accurately. As a way of validating this proposal, a case study is shown. The methodology proposed in this case study was applied in a real case, considering an LNG facility located in central Chile. In addition, sensitivity studies and comparisons with the results obtained by a traditional Life Cycle Costing model are included. The results show the usefulness of incorporating asset health aspects into the Life Cycle Costing of physical assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Orlando Durán & Fabián Orellana & Pablo Perez & Tamara Hidalgo, 2020. "Incorporating an Asset Health Index into a Life Cycle Costing: A Proposition and Study Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1787-:d:428434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1787/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1787/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Korpi & Timo Ala-Risku, 2008. "Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(3), pages 240-261, March.
    2. Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & De Rosa, Salvatore Paolo, 2020. "Use of fuzzy cognitive maps to develop policy strategies for the optimization of municipal waste management: A case study of the land of fires (Italy)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Orlando Durán & Paulo Sergio Afonso & Paulo Andrés Durán, 2019. "Spare Parts Cost Management for Long-Term Economic Sustainability: Using Fuzzy Activity Based LCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orlando Durán & Paulo Afonso & Víctor Jiménez & Katty Carvajal, 2023. "Cost of Ownership of Spare Parts under Uncertainty: Integrating Reliability and Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    3. Zhikun Ding & Xinyue Huang & Xinrui Wang & Qiaohui Chen & Jiasheng Zhang & Zezhou Wu, 2024. "Investigating the Determinants of Construction Stakeholders’ Intention to Use Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products Based on the S-O-R Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    5. Hugo Raposo & José Torres Farinha & Luís Ferreira & Diego Galar, 2018. "Dimensioning reserve bus fleet using life cycle cost models and condition based/predictive maintenance: a case study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 169-190, May.
    6. Mattia Rapa & Laura Gobbi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Haibing Liu & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer, 2020. "Analyzing the Criteria of Efficient Carbon Capture and Separation Technologies for Sustainable Clean Energy Usage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Julian Gaus & Sven Wehking & Andreas H. Glas & Michael Eßig, 2022. "Economic Sustainability by Using Life Cycle Cost Information in the Buying Center: Insights from the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    10. Marianna Lena Kambanou, 2020. "Life Cycle Costing: Understanding How It Is Practised and Its Relationship to Life Cycle Management—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Rita Mendonça & Peter Roebeling & Teresa Fidélis & Miguel Saraiva, 2021. "Policy Instruments to Encourage the Adoption of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Landscapes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    13. Daniela Vysloužilová & Karel Sellner, 2020. "Modern Methods For Evaluation Of Investment Efficiency In Engineering," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 102-115.
    14. Giuseppe Bonazzi & Mattia Iotti, 2016. "Evaluation of Investment in Renovation to Increase the Quality of Buildings: A Specific Discounted Cash Flow ( DCF ) Approach of Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, March.
    15. José Edmundo de Almeida Pais & Hugo D. N. Raposo & José Torres Farinha & Antonio J. Marques Cardoso & Pedro Alexandre Marques, 2021. "Optimizing the Life Cycle of Physical Assets through an Integrated Life Cycle Assessment Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Benedetta Nucci & Fabio Iraldo & Maria Rosa De Giacomo, 2016. "The relevance of Life Cycle Costing in Green Public Procurement," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 91-109.
    17. Erwin M. Schau & Marzia Traverso & Annekatrin Lehmann & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2011. "Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Settanni, Ettore & Newnes, Linda B. & Thenent, Nils E. & Parry, Glenn & Goh, Yee Mey, 2014. "A through-life costing methodology for use in product–service-systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 161-177.
    19. Irene Roda & Marco Macchi, 2018. "A framework to embed Asset Management in production companies," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(4), pages 368-378, August.
    20. Francesca De Filippis & Vincenzo Valentino & Giuseppina Sequino & Giorgia Borriello & Marita Georgia Riccardi & Biancamaria Pierri & Pellegrino Cerino & Antonio Pizzolante & Edoardo Pasolli & Mauro Es, 2024. "Exposure to environmental pollutants selects for xenobiotic-degrading functions in the human gut microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1787-:d:428434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.