IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i2p282-d1568714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A State-of-the-Art Fractional Order-Driven Differential Evolution for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Sichen Tao

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi 930-8555, Japan)

  • Sicheng Liu

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi 930-8555, Japan)

  • Ruihan Zhao

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200082, China)

  • Yifei Yang

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8560, Japan)

  • Hiroyoshi Todo

    (Wicresoft Co., Ltd., Tokyo 163-0445, Japan)

  • Haichuan Yang

    (Graduate School of Technology, Industrial and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan)

Abstract

The wind farm layout optimization problem (WFLOP) aims to maximize wind energy utilization efficiency and mitigate energy losses caused by wake effects by optimizing the spatial layout of wind turbines. Although Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) have been widely used in WFLOP due to their discrete optimization characteristics, they still have limitations in global exploration capability and optimization depth. Meanwhile, the Differential Evolution algorithm (DE), known for its strong global optimization ability and excellent performance in handling complex nonlinear problems, is well recognized in continuous optimization issues. However, since DE was originally designed for continuous optimization scenarios, it shows insufficient adaptability under the discrete nature of WFLOP, limiting its potential advantages. In this paper, we propose a Fractional-Order Difference-driven DE Optimization Algorithm called FODE. By introducing the memory and non-local properties of fractional-order differences, FODE effectively overcomes the adaptability issues of advanced DE variants in WFLOP’s discreteness while organically applying their global optimization capabilities for complex nonlinear problems to WFLOP to achieve more efficient overall optimization performance. Experimental results show that under 10 complex wind farm conditions, FODE significantly outperforms various current state-of-the-art WFLOP algorithms including GA, PSO, and DE variants in terms of optimization performance, robustness, and applicability. Incorporating more realistic wind speed distribution and wind condition data into modeling and experiments, further enhancing the realism of WFLOP studies presented here, provides a new technical pathway for optimizing wind farm layouts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sichen Tao & Sicheng Liu & Ruihan Zhao & Yifei Yang & Hiroyoshi Todo & Haichuan Yang, 2025. "A State-of-the-Art Fractional Order-Driven Differential Evolution for Wind Farm Layout Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:282-:d:1568714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/2/282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/2/282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Zervoudakis, Konstantinos & Andronikidis, Andreas & Altsitsiadis, Efthymios, 2020. "Fuzzy self-tuning differential evolution for optimal product line design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1161-1169.
    2. Fernando Porté-Agel & Yu-Ting Wu & Chang-Hung Chen, 2013. "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wind Direction on Turbine Wakes and Power Losses in a Large Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Wei Wei & Steven J. Davis & Philippe Ciais & Jin Bai & Shushi Peng & Qiang Zhang & Klaus Hubacek & Gregg Marland & Robert J. Andres & Douglas Crawford-Brown & Jintai Lin & Hongya, 2015. "Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7565), pages 335-338, August.
    4. Enas Taha Sayed & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Abdul Hai Alami & Ali Radwan & Ayman Mdallal & Ahmed Rezk & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Grady, S.A. & Hussaini, M.Y. & Abdullah, M.M., 2005. "Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 259-270.
    6. Jan Christoph Steckel & Michael Jakob, 2018. "The role of financing cost and de-risking strategies for clean energy investment," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 155, pages 19-28.
    7. Myles R. Allen & David J. Frame & Chris Huntingford & Chris D. Jones & Jason A. Lowe & Malte Meinshausen & Nicolai Meinshausen, 2009. "Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7242), pages 1163-1166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sichen Tao & Yifei Yang & Ruihan Zhao & Hiroyoshi Todo & Zheng Tang, 2024. "Competitive Elimination Improved Differential Evolution for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2015. "Solving the wind farm layout optimization problem using random search algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 182-192.
    3. Ju Feng & Wen Zhong Shen, 2015. "Modelling Wind for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Using Joint Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Hou, Peng & Hu, Weihao & Chen, Cong & Soltani, Mohsen & Chen, Zhe, 2016. "Optimization of offshore wind farm layout in restricted zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 487-496.
    5. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    7. Yang, Kun & Deng, Xiaowei & Ti, Zilong & Yang, Shanghui & Huang, Senbin & Wang, Yuhang, 2023. "A data-driven layout optimization framework of large-scale wind farms based on machine learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Wang, Longyan & Cholette, Michael E. & Tan, Andy C.C. & Gu, Yuantong, 2017. "A computationally-efficient layout optimization method for real wind farms considering altitude variations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 147-159.
    9. Fankhauser, Samuel & Hepburn, Cameron, 2010. "Designing carbon markets. Part I: Carbon markets in time," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4363-4370, August.
    10. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    11. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    12. Man, Yi & Yan, Yukun & Wang, Xu & Ren, Jingzheng & Xiong, Qingang & He, Zhenglei, 2023. "Overestimated carbon emission of the pulp and paper industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    13. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    14. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Dietz, Simon & Gollier, Christian & Kessler, Louise, 2018. "The climate beta," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 258-274.
    16. Zhang, Haoran & Li, Ruixiong & Cai, Xingrui & Zheng, Chaoyue & Liu, Laibao & Liu, Maodian & Zhang, Qianru & Lin, Huiming & Chen, Long & Wang, Xuejun, 2022. "Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    17. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Rezai, Armon, 2017. "Cumulative emissions, unburnable fossil fuel, and the optimal carbon tax," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 216-222.
    18. Song, Mengxuan & Wen, Yi & Duan, Bin & Wang, Jun & Gong, Qi, 2017. "Micro-siting optimization of a wind farm built in multiple phases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 95-103.
    19. Chen, Yuhong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Yang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Xiaohong & Pan, Hengyu & Wu, Jun & Lei, Yongjia & Zhang, Yanzong & Wang, Guiyin & Xu, Min & Luo, Hongbin, 2022. "Performance comparison of urea production using one set of integrated indicators considering energy use, economic cost and emissions’ impacts: A case from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    20. Hermann Held, 2019. "Cost Risk Analysis: Dynamically Consistent Decision-Making under Climate Targets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 247-261, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:282-:d:1568714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.