IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i1p143-d1558898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical Model for Assessing New, Non-Fossil Fuel Technological Products (Li-Ion Batteries and Electric Vehicle)

Author

Listed:
  • Igor E. Anufriev

    (Higher School of Applied Mathematics and Computational Physics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Bulat Khusainov

    (Department of Science and Commercialization, Zhetysu University Named After I. Zhansugurov, St. Zhansugurov 187 A, Taldykorgan 040009, Kazakhstan)

  • Andrea Tick

    (Keleti Karoly Faculty of Business and Management, Obuda University, Tavaszmező Str. 15–17, 1084 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Tessaleno Devezas

    (Engineering Faculty, Atlântica Instituto Universitário, 2730-036 Barcarena, Portugal)

  • Askar Sarygulov

    (Department of Science and Commercialization, Zhetysu University Named After I. Zhansugurov, St. Zhansugurov 187 A, Taldykorgan 040009, Kazakhstan)

  • Sholpan Kaimoldina

    (Department of Science and Commercialization, Zhetysu University Named After I. Zhansugurov, St. Zhansugurov 187 A, Taldykorgan 040009, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Since private cars and vans accounted for more than 25% of global oil consumption and about 10% of energy-related CO 2 emissions in 2022, increasing the share of electric vehicle (EV) ownership is considered an important solution for reducing CO 2 emissions. At the same time, reducing emissions entails certain economic losses for those countries whose exports are largely covered by the oil trade. The explosive growth of the EV segment over the past 15 years has given rise to overly optimistic forecasts for global EV penetration by 2050. One of the major obstacles to such a development scenario is the limited availability of resources, especially critical materials. This paper proposes a mathematical model to predict the global EV fleet based on the limited availability of critical materials such as lithium, one of the key elements for battery production. The proposed model has three distinctive features. First, it shows that the classical logistic function, due to the specificity of its structure, cannot correctly describe market saturation in the case of using resources with limited serves. Second, even the use of a special multiplier that describes the market saturation process taking into account the depletion (finiteness) of the used resource does not obtain satisfactory economic results because of the “high speed” depletion of this resource. Third, the analytical solution of the final model indicates the point in time at which changes in saturation rate occur. The latter situation allows us to determine the tracking of market saturation, which is more similar to the process that is actually occurring. We believe that this model can also be validated to estimate the production of wind turbines that use rare earth elements such as neodymium and dysprosium (for the production of powerful and permanent magnets for wind turbines). These results also suggest the need for oil-exporting countries to technologically diversify their economies to minimize losses in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor E. Anufriev & Bulat Khusainov & Andrea Tick & Tessaleno Devezas & Askar Sarygulov & Sholpan Kaimoldina, 2025. "Mathematical Model for Assessing New, Non-Fossil Fuel Technological Products (Li-Ion Batteries and Electric Vehicle)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:143-:d:1558898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tessaleno Devezas & Andrea Tick & Askar Sarygulov & Polina Rukina, 2024. "The Slow Pace of Green Transformation: Underlying Factors and Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Fulton, Lewis M & Jaffe, Amy & McDonald, Zane, 2019. "Internal Combustion Engine Bans and Global Oil Use," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt52j400b1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Monica Bonacina & Mert Demir & Antonio Sileo & Angela Zanoni, 2024. "The slow lane: a study on the diffusion of full-electric cars in Italy," Working Papers 2024.19, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Krešimir Jurlin, 2023. "How Efficient and Socially Sensitive Are Fiscal Incentives for Electric Cars in Europe?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Bonacina, Monica & Demir, Mert & Sileo, Antonio & Zanoni, Angela, 2024. "The slow lane: a study on the diffusion of full-electric cars in Italy," FEEM Working Papers 344135, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Gallagher, Kelly Sims & Muehlegger, Erich, 2011. "Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Andrea Tick & Askar Akaev & Tessaleno Campos Devezas & Askar Sarygulov & Alexander Petryakov & Anufriev Igor Evgenevich, 2024. "Assessing Decarbonization Approaches across Major Economies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-33, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    2. Kverndokk, Snorre & Figenbaum, Erik & Hovi, Jon, 2020. "Would my driving pattern change if my neighbor were to buy an emission-free car?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Wang, Jiaxing & Matsumoto, Shigeru, 2022. "Can subsidy programs lead consumers to select “greener” products?: Evidence from the Eco-car program in Japan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Li, Zhe & Ouyang, Minggao, 2011. "A win-win marginal rent analysis for operator and consumer under battery leasing mode in China electric vehicle market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3222-3237, June.
    5. Ozaki, Ritsuko & Sevastyanova, Katerina, 2011. "Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2217-2227, May.
    6. Michael Peneder & Spyros Arvanitis & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2022. "Policy instruments and self-reported impacts of the adoption of energy saving technologies in the DACH region," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 369-404, May.
    7. Shanjun Li & Joshua Linn & Erich Muehlegger, 2014. "Gasoline Taxes and Consumer Behavior," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 302-342, November.
    8. Lucas W. Davis, 2017. "The Environmental Cost of Global Fuel Subsidies," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(KAPSARC S).
    9. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    10. Jun-bin Wang & Lufei Huang, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    11. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    12. Xu, Lei & Su, Jun, 2016. "From government to market and from producer to consumer: Transition of policy mix towards clean mobility in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 328-340.
    13. Jacobus Nel & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2022. "Electric Vehicles Market and Policy Conditions: Identifying South African Policy ``Potholes"," Working Papers 202257, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    14. Bergantino, Angela S. & Intini, Mario & Percoco, Marco, 2021. "New car taxation and its unintended environmental consequences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 36-48.
    15. Heutel, Garth, 2019. "Prospect theory and energy efficiency," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-254.
    16. Huang, Shisheng & Safiullah, Hameed & Xiao, Jingjie & Hodge, Bri-Mathias S. & Hoffman, Ray & Soller, Joan & Jones, Doug & Dininger, Dennis & Tyner, Wallace E. & Liu, Andrew & Pekny, Joseph F., 2012. "The effects of electric vehicles on residential households in the city of Indianapolis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 442-455.
    17. Zhang, Tong & Burke, Paul J. & Wang, Qi, 2024. "Effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in China: A three-dimensional panel study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Andrea Morone & Francesco Nemore & Simone Nuzzo, 2018. "Experimental evidence on tax salience and tax incidence," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(4), pages 582-612, August.
    19. Guoqiang Zhang & Yanmei Xu & Juan Zhang, 2016. "Consumer-Oriented Policy towards Diffusion of Electric Vehicles: City-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. O. Cem Ozturk & Sriram Venkataraman & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2016. "Price Reactions to Rivals’ Local Channel Exits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 588-604, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:143-:d:1558898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.