IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i7p964-d1362963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Boyle–Romberg Trinomial Tree, a Highly Efficient Method for Double Barrier Option Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Leduc

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Oscillations in option price convergence have long been a problematic aspect of tree methods, inhibiting the use of repeated Richardson extrapolation that could otherwise greatly accelerate convergence, a feature integral to some of the most efficient modern methods. These oscillations are typically caused by the fluctuating positions of nodes around the discontinuities in the payoff function or its derivatives. Our paper addresses this crucial gap that typically prohibits the use of lattice methods when high efficiency is needed. Focusing on double barrier options, we develop a trinomial tree in which the positions of the nodes are precisely adjusted to align with these discontinuities throughout the option’s lifespan and across various time steps. This alignment enables the use of repeated extrapolation to achieve high order convergence, including near barriers, a well-known challenge in many tree methods. Maintaining the inherent simplicity and adaptability of tree methods, our approach is easily applicable to other models and option types.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Leduc, 2024. "The Boyle–Romberg Trinomial Tree, a Highly Efficient Method for Double Barrier Option Pricing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:964-:d:1362963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/7/964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/7/964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amirhossein Sobhani & Mariyan Milev, 2017. "A Numerical Method for Pricing Discrete Double Barrier Option by Lagrange Interpolation on Jacobi Node," Papers 1712.01060, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
    2. Lu, Yu-Ming & Lyuu, Yuh-Dauh, 2023. "Very fast algorithms for implied barriers and moving-barrier options pricing," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 251-271.
    3. Hangsuck Lee & Hongjun Ha & Minha Lee, 2022. "Piecewise linear double barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 125-151, January.
    4. Boyle, Phelim P., 1988. "A Lattice Framework for Option Pricing with Two State Variables," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Sheng-Feng Luo & Hsin-Chieh Wong, 2023. "Continuity correction: on the pricing of discrete double barrier options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 51-90, April.
    6. Guillaume Leduc & Kenneth Palmer, 2023. "The Convergence Rate of Option Prices in Trinomial Trees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-33, March.
    7. Chuang‐Chang Chang & San‐Lin Chung & Richard C. Stapleton, 2007. "Richardson extrapolation techniques for the pricing of American‐style options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(8), pages 791-817, August.
    8. Jr-Yan Wang & Chuan-Ju Wang & Tian-Shyr Dai & Tzu-Chun Chen & Liang-Chih Liu & Lei Zhou & Kazem Nouri, 2022. "Efficient and Robust Combinatorial Option Pricing Algorithms on the Trinomial Lattice for Polynomial and Barrier Options," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiefei Yang & Guanglian Li, 2023. "On Sparse Grid Interpolation for American Option Pricing with Multiple Underlying Assets," Papers 2309.08287, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    2. Haixing Liu & Yuntao Wang & Chi Zhang & Albert S. Chen & Guangtao Fu, 2018. "Assessing real options in urban surface water flood risk management under climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(1), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Xuemei Gao & Dongya Deng & Yue Shan, 2014. "Lattice Methods for Pricing American Strangles with Two-Dimensional Stochastic Volatility Models," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, April.
    4. Augusto Castillo, 2004. "Firm and Corporate Bond Valuation: A Simulation Dynamic Programming Approach," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 41(124), pages 345-360.
    5. Seiji Harikae & James S. Dyer & Tianyang Wang, 2021. "Valuing Real Options in the Volatile Real World," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 171-189, January.
    6. Turkington, Joshua & Walsh, David, 2000. "Informed traders and their market preference: Empirical evidence from prices and volumes of options and stock," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 559-585, October.
    7. Donald J. Brown & Rustam Ibragimov, 2005. "Sign Tests for Dependent Observations and Bounds for Path-Dependent Options," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1518, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    8. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    9. Jeechul Woo & Chenru Liu & Jaehyuk Choi, 2018. "Leave-one-out least squares Monte Carlo algorithm for pricing Bermudan options," Papers 1810.02071, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    10. Gambaro, Anna Maria & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Fusai, Gianluca, 2020. "General lattice methods for arithmetic Asian options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1185-1199.
    11. Jérôme Detemple, 2014. "Optimal Exercise for Derivative Securities," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 459-487, December.
    12. Kassar, Ilhem & Lasserre, Pierre, 2004. "Species preservation and biodiversity value: a real options approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 857-879, September.
    13. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    14. Golbabai, Ahmad & Mohebianfar, Ehsan, 2017. "A new method for evaluating options based on multiquadric RBF-FD method," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 130-141.
    15. Carol Alexander & Andrew Scourse, 2004. "Bivariate normal mixture spread option valuation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(6), pages 637-648.
    16. Jia‐Hau Guo & Lung‐Fu Chang, 2020. "Repeated Richardson extrapolation and static hedging of barrier options under the CEV model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(6), pages 974-988, June.
    17. Yoram Landskroner & Alon Raviv, 2008. "The valuation of inflation‐indexed and FX convertible bonds," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 634-655, July.
    18. Junkee Jeon & Geonwoo Kim, 2022. "Analytic Valuation Formula for American Strangle Option in the Mean-Reversion Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. feng dai, 2004. "The Partial Distribution: Definition, Properties and Applications in Economy," Econometrics 0403008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Elias, R.S. & Wahab, M.I.M. & Fang, L., 2016. "The spark spread and clean spark spread option based valuation of a power plant with multiple turbines," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-327.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:964-:d:1362963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.