IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i17p2783-d1474021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Wind Turbine Gearbox Oil Temperature Based on Stochastic Differential Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Hongsheng Su

    (School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Rail Transit Electrical Automation Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Zonghao Ding

    (School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xingsheng Wang

    (School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of high failure rate and inconvenient maintenance of wind turbine gearboxes, this paper establishes a stochastic differential equation model that can be used to fit the change of gearbox oil temperature and adopts an iterative computational method and Markov-based modified optimization to fit the prediction sequence in order to realize the accurate prediction of gearbox oil temperature. The model divides the oil temperature change of the gearbox into two parts, internal aging and external random perturbation, adopts the approximation theorem to establish the internal aging model, and uses Brownian motion to simulate the external random perturbation. The model parameters were calculated by the Newton–Raphson iterative method based on the gearbox oil temperature monitoring data. Iterative calculations and Markov-based corrections were performed on the model prediction data. The gearbox oil temperature variations were simulated in MATLAB, and the fitting and testing errors were calculated before and after the iterations. By comparing the fitting and testing errors with the ordinary differential equations and the stochastic differential equations before iteration, the iterated model can better reflect the gear oil temperature trend and predict the oil temperature at a specific time. The accuracy of the iterated model in terms of fitting and prediction is important for the development of preventive maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongsheng Su & Zonghao Ding & Xingsheng Wang, 2024. "Prediction of Wind Turbine Gearbox Oil Temperature Based on Stochastic Differential Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2783-:d:1474021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2783/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2783/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hameed, Z. & Ahn, S.H. & Cho, Y.M., 2010. "Practical aspects of a condition monitoring system for a wind turbine with emphasis on its design, system architecture, testing and installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 879-894.
    2. Tian, Zhigang & Jin, Tongdan & Wu, Bairong & Ding, Fangfang, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1502-1509.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    3. Ha, Jong M. & Oh, Hyunseok & Park, Jungho & Youn, Byeng D., 2017. "Classification of operating conditions of wind turbines for a class-wise condition monitoring strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 594-605.
    4. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    5. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    6. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    7. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    8. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    9. Abdollahzadeh, Hadi & Atashgar, Karim & Abbasi, Morteza, 2016. "Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 247-261.
    10. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Verbert, K. & De Schutter, B. & Babuška, R., 2017. "Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 310-321.
    12. Shafiee, Mahmood, 2015. "Maintenance logistics organization for offshore wind energy: Current progress and future perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-193.
    13. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Van Ostaeyen, Joris & Duflou, Joost R. & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "Quantifying the added value of an imperfectly performing condition monitoring system—Application to a wind turbine gearbox," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 45-57.
    14. Tian, Zhigang & Liao, Haitao, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 581-589.
    15. Yang, Chunzhen & Liu, Jingquan & Zeng, Yuyun & Xie, Guangyao, 2019. "Real-time condition monitoring and fault detection of components based on machine-learning reconstruction model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 433-441.
    16. Diana Chronéer & Peter Wallström, 2016. "Exploring Waste and Value in a Lean Context," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 282-282, September.
    17. Yu-Chung Tsao & Thuy-Linh Vu, 2023. "Electricity pricing, capacity, and predictive maintenance considering reliability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 991-1011, March.
    18. Zafar Hameed & Jørn Vatn, 2012. "Role of grouping in the development of an overall maintenance optimization framework for offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(6), pages 584-601, December.
    19. Vega, Manuel A. & Hu, Zhen & Todd, Michael D., 2020. "Optimal maintenance decisions for deteriorating quoin blocks in miter gates subject to uncertainty in the condition rating protocol," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2783-:d:1474021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.