IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i16p2489-d1454816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimal Financing Decisions of Capital-Constrained Manufacturers under Different Power Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Xie

    (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Application for Macro-Economy, School of Business, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    Hunan Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Zicong Duan

    (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Application for Macro-Economy, School of Business, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    Hunan Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Haitao He

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the optimal financing decisions of capital-constrained manufacturers under different power structures. Using a Stackelberg game model, it analyzes the optimal equilibrium operational decisions of capital-constrained manufacturers at varying levels of internal capital. The study finds that, compared to a power structure dominated by eco-innovative enterprises, a power structure led by ordinary enterprises enhances the level of eco-innovation of innovative products and the overall profitability of the supply chain. When eco-innovative enterprises are well-capitalized, internal financing has lower costs but may lead to idle funds, while bank financing and mixed financing have higher costs but make full use of available capital. When eco-innovative enterprises are undercapitalized, mixed financing is the optimal choice. The research employs numerical simulations to analyze the impacts of consumer environmental awareness, innovation investment costs, and production costs on the level of eco-innovation in products, manufacturers’ profits, and the overall profitability of the supply chain, providing decision-making references for governments and enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Xie & Zicong Duan & Haitao He, 2024. "The Optimal Financing Decisions of Capital-Constrained Manufacturers under Different Power Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2489-:d:1454816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang Huang & Honghua Hu & Han Song & Haiyan Li & Shasha Zhang & Jia Zhai, 2023. "Allocation of the Carbon Emission Abatement Target in Low Carbon Supply Chain Considering Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Zhao Chen & Zhikuo Liu & Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato & Daniel Yi Xu, 2021. "Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2065-2100, July.
    3. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Optimal Taxation and R&D Policies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 645-684, March.
    3. Joe Cox & Daniel Kaimann, 2013. "The Signaling Effect of Critics - Evidence from a Market for Experience Goods," Working Papers CIE 68, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    4. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    5. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    6. Zhou, Xi & Xiao, Min & Wu, Huiying & You, Jiaxing, 2024. "Does policy uncertainty travel across borders? Evidence from MNC subsidiary investment decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Mellace, Giovanni & Ventura, Marco, 2019. "Intended and unintended effects of public incentives for innovation. Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy," Discussion Papers on Economics 9/2019, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    8. Yuanfang Lin & Amit Pazgal, 2016. "Hide Supremacy or Admit Inferiority—Market Entry Strategies in Response to Consumer Informational Needs," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(2), pages 94-103, June.
    9. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Reinhold Decker, 2014. "Real-Time Analysis of Online Product Reviews by Means of Multi-Layer Feed-Forward Neural Networks," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 60-70, November.
    11. Tingting Song & Jinghua Huang & Yong Tan & Yifan Yu, 2019. "Using User- and Marketer-Generated Content for Box Office Revenue Prediction: Differences Between Microblogging and Third-Party Platforms," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 191-203, March.
    12. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    13. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    14. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    15. Giovanni Bernardo & Massimo Ruberti & Roberto Verona, 2022. "Image is everything! Professional football players' visibility and wages: evidence from the Italian Serie A," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 595-614, January.
    16. Vimi Jham, 2023. "Filli Café: Experience Tea and Talk," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-58, March.
    17. Tang, Le, 2022. "The dynamic demand for capital and labor: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    19. Caldieraro, Fabio & Cunha, Marcus, 2022. "Consumers’ response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 724-744.
    20. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2489-:d:1454816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.