IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i14p2209-d1435252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cancer Diagnosis by Gene-Environment Interactions via Combination of SMOTE-Tomek and Overlapped Group Screening Approaches with Application to Imbalanced TCGA Clinical and Genomic Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jie-Huei Wang

    (Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Yu Liu

    (Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan)

  • You-Ruei Min

    (Department of Statistics, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan)

  • Zih-Han Wu

    (Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan)

  • Po-Lin Hou

    (Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan)

Abstract

The complexity of cancer development involves intricate interactions among multiple biomarkers, such as gene-environment interactions. Utilizing microarray gene expression profile data for cancer classification is anticipated to be effective, thus drawing considerable interest in the fields of bioinformatics and computational biology. Due to the characteristics of genomic data, problems of high-dimensional interactions and noise interference do exist during the analysis process. When building cancer diagnosis models, we often face the dilemma of model adaptation errors due to an imbalance of data types. To mitigate the issues, we apply the SMOTE-Tomek procedure to rectify the imbalance problem. Following this, we utilize the overlapping group screening method alongside a binary logistic regression model to integrate gene pathway information, facilitating the identification of significant biomarkers associated with clinically imbalanced cancer or normal outcomes. Simulation studies across different imbalanced rates and gene structures validate our proposed method’s effectiveness, surpassing common machine learning techniques in terms of classification prediction accuracy. We also demonstrate that prediction performance improves with SMOTE-Tomek treatment compared to no imbalance treatment and SMOTE treatment across various imbalance rates. In the real-world application, we integrate clinical and gene expression data with prior pathway information. We employ SMOTE-Tomek and our proposed methods to identify critical biomarkers and gene-environment interactions linked to the imbalanced binary outcomes (cancer or normal) in patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas datasets of lung adenocarcinoma and breast invasive carcinoma. Our proposed method consistently achieves satisfactory classification accuracy. Additionally, we have identified biomarkers indicative of gene-environment interactions relevant to cancer and have provided corresponding estimates of odds ratios. Moreover, in high-dimensional imbalanced data, for achieving good prediction results, we recommend considering the order of balancing processing and feature screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie-Huei Wang & Cheng-Yu Liu & You-Ruei Min & Zih-Han Wu & Po-Lin Hou, 2024. "Cancer Diagnosis by Gene-Environment Interactions via Combination of SMOTE-Tomek and Overlapped Group Screening Approaches with Application to Imbalanced TCGA Clinical and Genomic Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2209-:d:1435252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    3. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akhrorbek Tukhtaev & Dilmurod Turimov & Jiyoun Kim & Wooseong Kim, 2024. "Feature Selection and Machine Learning Approaches for Detecting Sarcopenia Through Predictive Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Shan Luo & Zehua Chen, 2014. "Sequential Lasso Cum EBIC for Feature Selection With Ultra-High Dimensional Feature Space," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 1229-1240, September.
    3. Shi Chen & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Brenda L'opez Cabrera, 2020. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Power Derivative Market," Papers 2009.09739, arXiv.org.
    4. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    5. Peter Bühlmann & Jacopo Mandozzi, 2014. "High-dimensional variable screening and bias in subsequent inference, with an empirical comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 407-430, June.
    6. Anders Bredahl Kock, 2012. "On the Oracle Property of the Adaptive Lasso in Stationary and Nonstationary Autoregressions," CREATES Research Papers 2012-05, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    7. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Li, Xinyi & Wang, Li & Nettleton, Dan, 2019. "Sparse model identification and learning for ultra-high-dimensional additive partially linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 204-228.
    9. Lee, Ji Hyung & Shi, Zhentao & Gao, Zhan, 2022. "On LASSO for predictive regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 322-349.
    10. Medeiros, Marcelo C. & Mendes, Eduardo F., 2016. "ℓ1-regularization of high-dimensional time-series models with non-Gaussian and heteroskedastic errors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 255-271.
    11. Guang Cheng & Hao Zhang & Zuofeng Shang, 2015. "Sparse and efficient estimation for partial spline models with increasing dimension," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(1), pages 93-127, February.
    12. Wang, Pei & Yin, Xiangrong & Yuan, Qingcong & Kryscio, Richard, 2021. "Feature filter for estimating central mean subspace and its sparse solution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Dingke Tang & Dehan Kong & Wenliang Pan & Linbo Wang, 2023. "Ultra‐high dimensional variable selection for doubly robust causal inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 903-914, June.
    14. Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    15. Hu Yang & Ning Li & Jing Yang, 2020. "A robust and efficient estimation and variable selection method for partially linear models with large-dimensional covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1911-1937, October.
    16. Zhao, Sihai Dave & Li, Yi, 2012. "Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 397-411.
    17. Chen, Shi & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & López Cabrera, Brenda, 2018. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Energy Market," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-017, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    18. Zakariya Yahya Algamal & Muhammad Hisyam Lee, 2019. "A two-stage sparse logistic regression for optimal gene selection in high-dimensional microarray data classification," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 753-771, September.
    19. He, Yong & Zhang, Liang & Ji, Jiadong & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 568-582.
    20. Ricardo P. Masini & Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2023. "Machine learning advances for time series forecasting," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 76-111, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2209-:d:1435252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.