IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i14p2191-d1433971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience Measurement of Bus–Subway Network Based on Generalized Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Yulong Pei

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Fei Xie

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Ziqi Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Chuntong Dong

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Buses and subways are crucial modes of transportation for residents, yet frequent disturbances pose serious challenges to their daily commutes. To tackle these disruptions and boost the stability of the transportation network, it is vital to accurately measure the resilience of a bus–subway composite network under such events. Therefore, this study utilizes the generalized cost between stations as weights with which to construct a bus–subway weighted composite network. Subsequently, three indicators, namely reachability, path importance, and weighted coreness, are proposed to evaluate the significance of the nodes, thereby combining the improved CRITIC-TOPSIS method to identify the critical nodes. Then, deliberate attacks and preferential restorations are conducted on the nodes, considering their importance and the critical nodes sequences, respectively. Finally, network resilience changes are characterized by the network connectivity coefficient and global accessibility, and the network resilience is compared under different attack and recovery strategies. The research results indicate that resilience is lowest when using reachability sequences to attack and recover the network. The network’s recovery is most significant when using the critical nodes sequences. When 70% of the nodes are restored, the network’s performance is essentially fully recovered. Additionally, the resilience of a bus–subway network is higher than that of a single bus network. This study applies the generalized cost to weight the transportation network, and considers the impact of multiple factors on the ease of connectivity between the nodes, which facilitates the accurate measurement of the resilience of a bus–subway network and enhances the ability to cope with disruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulong Pei & Fei Xie & Ziqi Wang & Chuntong Dong, 2024. "Resilience Measurement of Bus–Subway Network Based on Generalized Cost," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2191-:d:1433971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2018. "Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 72-78.
    2. Nazli Yonca Aydin & H. Sebnem Duzgun & Friedemann Wenzel & Hans Rudolf Heinimann, 2018. "Integration of stress testing with graph theory to assess the resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 37-68, March.
    3. Zhang, Yifan & Ng, S. Thomas, 2022. "Robustness of urban railway networks against the cascading failures induced by the fluctuation of passenger flow," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. D’Lima, Minette & Medda, Francesca, 2015. "A new measure of resilience: An application to the London Underground," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
    5. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junhong Hu & Mingshu Yang & Yunzhu Zhen, 2024. "A Review of Resilience Assessment and Recovery Strategies of Urban Rail Transit Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Gonçalves, L.A.P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J.G., 2020. "Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Knoester, Max J. & Bešinović, Nikola & Afghari, Amir Pooyan & Goverde, Rob M.P. & van Egmond, Jochen, 2024. "A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Malandri, Caterina & Mantecchini, Luca & Postorino, Maria Nadia, 2023. "A comprehensive approach to assess transportation system resilience towards disruptive events. Case study on airside airport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 109-122.
    6. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    7. Qingjie Qi & Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu, 2022. "Resilience Assessment of an Urban Metro Complex Network: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou Metro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    11. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    12. Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu & Qingjie Qi, 2023. "Dynamic Influence Analysis of the Important Station Evolution on the Resilience of Complex Metro Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Ali Shahabi & Sadigh Raissi & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Meysam Rafei, 2021. "Designing a resilient skip-stop schedule in rapid rail transit using a simulation-based optimization methodology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1691-1721, September.
    14. Guo, Mengzhuo & Zhang, Qingpeng & Liao, Xiuwu & Chen, Frank Youhua & Zeng, Daniel Dajun, 2021. "A hybrid machine learning framework for analyzing human decision-making through learning preferences," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Junli Zhang & Guoteng Wang & Zheng Xu & Zheren Zhang, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Strengthening Measures for AC/DC Hybrid Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    17. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    18. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Besharati Fard, Moein & Moradian, Parisa & Emarati, Mohammadreza & Ebadi, Mehdi & Gholamzadeh Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad & Klemeŝ, Jiří Jaromír, 2022. "Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2191-:d:1433971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.