IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i13p2138-d1430577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving Dynamic Full-Truckload Vehicle Routing Problem Using an Agent-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Selin Çabuk

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, Sarıcam, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

  • Rızvan Erol

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, Sarıcam, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

Abstract

In today’s complex and dynamic transportation networks, increasing energy costs and adverse environmental impacts necessitate the efficient transport of goods or raw materials across a network to minimize all related costs through vehicle assignment and routing decisions. Vehicle routing problems under dynamic and stochastic conditions are known to be very challenging in both mathematical modeling and computational complexity. In this study, a special variant of the full-truckload vehicle assignment and routing problem was investigated. First, a detailed analysis of the processes in a liquid transportation logistics firm with a large fleet of tanker trucks was conducted. Then, a new original problem with distinctive features compared with similar studies in the literature was formulated, including pickup/delivery time windows, nodes with different functions (pickup/delivery, washing facilities, and parking), a heterogeneous truck fleet, multiple trips per truck, multiple trailer types, multiple freight types, and setup times between changing freight types. This dynamic optimization problem was solved using an intelligent multi-agent model with agent designs that run on vehicle assignment and routing algorithms. To assess the performance of the proposed approach under varying environmental conditions (e.g., congestion factors and the ratio of orders with multiple trips) and different algorithmic parameter levels (e.g., the latest response time to orders and activating the interchange of trip assignments between vehicles), a detailed scenario analysis was conducted based on a set of designed simulation experiments. The simulation results indicate that the proposed dynamic approach is capable of providing good and efficient solutions in response to dynamic conditions. Furthermore, using longer latest response times and activating the interchange mechanism have significant positive impacts on the relevant costs, profitability, ratios of loaded trips over the total distance traveled, and the acceptance ratios of customer orders.

Suggested Citation

  • Selin Çabuk & Rızvan Erol, 2024. "Solving Dynamic Full-Truckload Vehicle Routing Problem Using an Agent-Based Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2138-:d:1430577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. B. Dantzig & J. H. Ramser, 1959. "The Truck Dispatching Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 80-91, October.
    2. Zhang, Ruiyou & Yun, Won Young & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2009. "A reactive tabu search algorithm for the multi-depot container truck transportation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 904-914, November.
    3. Gronalt, Manfred & Hartl, Richard F. & Reimann, Marc, 2003. "New savings based algorithms for time constrained pickup and delivery of full truckloads," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 520-535, December.
    4. Bai, Ruibin & Xue, Ning & Chen, Jianjun & Roberts, Gethin Wyn, 2015. "A set-covering model for a bidirectional multi-shift full truckload vehicle routing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 134-148.
    5. Farzaneh Karami & Wim Vancroonenburg & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2020. "A periodic optimization approach to dynamic pickup and delivery problems with time windows," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 711-731, December.
    6. Sundararajan Arunapuram & Kamlesh Mathur & Daniel Solow, 2003. "Vehicle Routing and Scheduling with Full Truckloads," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 170-182, May.
    7. Martin, Simon & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Beullens, Patrick & Ozcan, Ender & Juan, Angel A. & Burke, Edmund K., 2016. "A multi-agent based cooperative approach to scheduling and routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(1), pages 169-178.
    8. Mes, Martijn & van der Heijden, Matthieu & van Harten, Aart, 2007. "Comparison of agent-based scheduling to look-ahead heuristics for real-time transportation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 59-75, August.
    9. Nossack, Jenny & Pesch, Erwin, 2013. "A truck scheduling problem arising in intermodal container transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 666-680.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Escudero-Santana, Alejandro & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Cortés, Pablo & Onieva, Luis, 2021. "The one container drayage problem with soft time windows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Fan, Tijun & Pan, Qianlan & Pan, Fei & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Jingyi, 2020. "Intelligent logistics integration of internal and external transportation with separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Xue, Ning & Bai, Ruibin & Qu, Rong & Aickelin, Uwe, 2021. "A hybrid pricing and cutting approach for the multi-shift full truckload vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 500-514.
    4. Bustos-Coral, Daniel & Costa, Alysson M., 2022. "Drayage routing with heterogeneous fleet, compatibility constraints, and truck load configurations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2018. "The importance of considering non-linear layover and delay costs for local truckers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 331-355.
    6. Kenneth Stoop & Mario Pickavet & Didier Colle & Pieter Audenaert, 2024. "The dynamic stochastic container drayage problem with truck appointment scheduling," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(3), pages 953-985, September.
    7. Hilde Heggen & Yves Molenbruch & An Caris & Kris Braekers, 2019. "Intermodal Container Routing: Integrating Long-Haul Routing and Local Drayage Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-36, March.
    8. Song, Yujian & Zhang, Jiantong & Liang, Zhe & Ye, Chunming, 2017. "An exact algorithm for the container drayage problem under a separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 231-254.
    9. Zhang, Jian & Woensel, Tom Van, 2023. "Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    11. Neves-Moreira, F. & Amorim, P. & Guimarães, L. & Almada-Lobo, B., 2016. "A long-haul freight transportation problem: Synchronizing resources to deliver requests passing through multiple transshipment locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 487-506.
    12. Mohammad M. Fazel-Zarandi & J. Christopher Beck, 2012. "Using Logic-Based Benders Decomposition to Solve the Capacity- and Distance-Constrained Plant Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 387-398, August.
    13. Moghaddam, Mahboobeh & Pearce, Robin H. & Mokhtar, Hamid & Prato, Carlo G., 2020. "A generalised model for container drayage operations with heterogeneous fleet, multi-container sizes and two modes of operation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. van Lon, Rinde R.S. & Ferrante, Eliseo & Turgut, Ali E. & Wenseleers, Tom & Vanden Berghe, Greet & Holvoet, Tom, 2016. "Measures of dynamism and urgency in logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 614-624.
    15. Xuhui Yu & Yin Feng & Cong He & Chang Liu, 2024. "Modeling and Optimization of Container Drayage Problem with Empty Container Constraints across Multiple Inland Depots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Sanghyuk Yi & Bernd Scholz-Reiter & Taehoon Kim & Kap Hwan Kim, 2019. "Scheduling appointments for container truck arrivals considering their effects on congestion," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 730-762, September.
    17. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    18. Pillac, Victor & Gendreau, Michel & Guéret, Christelle & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2013. "A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 1-11.
    19. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    20. Samaneh Shiri & Nathan Huynh & Daniel Smith & Frank Harder, 2022. "Impact of Second-Tier Container Port Facilities on Drayage Operation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2138-:d:1430577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.