IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i12p1865-d1415272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quest for an ESG Country Rank: A Performance Contribution Analysis/MCDM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Tan

    (School of Management, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK)

  • Amir Karbassi Yazdi

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile)

  • Jorge Antunes

    (COPPEAD Graduate Business School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Paschoal Lemme 355, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, Brazil)

  • Peter Wanke

    (COPPEAD Graduate Business School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Paschoal Lemme 355, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, Brazil)

  • Angappa Gunasekaran

    (School of Business Administration, Penn State, Harrisburg, PA 16801, USA)

  • Henrique Luiz Corrêa

    (Crummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College, Winter Park, FL 32789, USA)

  • Giuliani Coluccio

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile)

Abstract

Utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors to rank countries according to these criteria aims to evaluate and prioritize countries based on their performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects. The contemporary world is influenced by a multitude of factors, which consequently impact our lives. Various models are devised to assess company performance, with the intention of enhancing quality of life. An exemplary case is the ESG framework, encompassing environmental, social, and governmental dimensions. Implementing this framework is intricate, and many nations are keen on understanding their global ranking and avenues for enhancement. Different statistical and mathematical methods have been employed to represent these rankings. This research endeavors to examine both types of methods to ascertain the one yielding the optimal outcome. The ESG model comprises eleven factors, each contributing to its efficacy. We employ the Performance Contribution Analysis (PCA), Clifford algebra method, and entropy weight technique to rank these factors, aiming to identify the most influential factor in countries’ ESG-based rankings. Based on prioritization results, political stability (PSAV) and the voice of accountability (VA) emerge as pivotal elements. In light of the ESG model and MCDA methods, the following countries exhibit significant societal impact: Sweden, Finland, New Zealand, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Denmark, India, Norway, Canada, Germany, Austria, and Australia. This research contributes in two distinct dimensions, considering the global context and MCDA methods employed. Undoubtedly, a research gap is identified, necessitating the development of a novel model for the comparative evaluation of countries in relation to prior studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Tan & Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Jorge Antunes & Peter Wanke & Angappa Gunasekaran & Henrique Luiz Corrêa & Giuliani Coluccio, 2024. "The Quest for an ESG Country Rank: A Performance Contribution Analysis/MCDM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1865-:d:1415272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teoh, Jun Hao & Cheah, Adrian Chee Siang & Motavasel, Zahra & Lam, Hon Loong, 2019. "Principal component analysis-aided statistical process optimisation (PASPO) for process improvement in industrial refineries," MPRA Paper 94058, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jan 2019.
    2. Xiaokai Meng & Ghulam Muhammad Shaikh, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental, Social, and Governance Criteria and Green Finance Investment Strategies Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. J. V. Zidek & W. Sun & N. D. Le, 2000. "Designing and integrating composite networks for monitoring multivariate gaussian pollution fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(1), pages 63-79.
    4. Alkaraan, Fadi & Albitar, Khaldoon & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, VG, 2022. "Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Carolina Almeida Cruz & Florinda Matos, 2023. "ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Panos Xidonas & Eric Essner, 2024. "On ESG Portfolio Construction: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 21-45, January.
    7. Chithambaranathan, P. & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Palaniappan, PL.K., 2015. "Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 163-176.
    8. Jiahui Su & Yidi Sun, 2023. "An Improved TOPSIS Model Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory: Application to ESG Performance Evaluation of State-Owned Mining Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sam Solaimani, 2024. "From Compliance to Capability: On the Role of Data and Technology in Environment, Social, and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Hessa Al-Thani & Jon Lee, 2020. "An R Package for Generating Covariance Matrices for Maximum-Entropy Sampling from Precipitation Chemistry Data," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Yeo, Lip Siang & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Lim, Chun Hsion & Leong, Wei Dong & Lam, Hon Loong & Wong, Yat Choy & Sunarso, Jaka & How, Bing Shen, 2022. "Sequential optimization of process and supply chains considering re-refineries for oil and gas circularity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    5. Marwa M. Sleem & Osama Y. Abdelfattah & Amr A. Abohany & Shaymaa E. Sorour, 2024. "A Comprehensive Approach to Biodiesel Blend Selection Using GRA-TOPSIS: A Case Study of Waste Cooking Oils in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Yago Fraga Ferreira Brandão & Leonardo Bandeira dos Santos & Gleice Paula de Araújo & Leonildo Pereira Pedrosa Júnior & Benjamim Francisco da Costa Neto & Rita de Cássia Freire Soares da Silva & Mohan, 2022. "Use of High-Frequency Ultrasound Waves for Boiler Water Demineralization/Desalination Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Zhao, Guanjia & Cui, Zhipeng & Xu, Jing & Liu, Wenhao & Ma, Suxia, 2022. "Hybrid modeling-based digital twin for performance optimization with flexible operation in the direct air-cooling power unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    8. Eko Budi Leksono & Suparno Suparno & Iwan Vanany, 2019. "Integration of a Balanced Scorecard, DEMATEL, and ANP for Measuring the Performance of a Sustainable Healthcare Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1, July.
    9. Beibei Zhang & Yang Mei & Yuxin Xiong & Yan Liu, 2024. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Service Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises? The Mediating Role of Dual Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Lei Xi & Ziyi Guo, 2024. "The Impact of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Dong, Weiwei & Niu, XiaoQin & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Naseem, Imran & Zaman, Khalid, 2024. "E-commerce mineral resource footprints: Investigating drivers for sustainable mining development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Hoshiar Mal & Nagendra Singh Nehra, 2023. "The Impact of IoT Characteristics, Cultural Factors and Safety Concerns on Consumer Purchase Intention of Green Electronic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.
    14. Bethlehem Tamiru Gizaw & Alev Taskin Gumus, 2016. "Humanitarian Relief Supply Chain Performance Evaluation: A Literature Review," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 105-120, April.
    15. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Cai, Cen & Tu, Yongqian & Li, Zhi, 2023. "Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    17. Xiaowen He & Weinien Chen, 2024. "Digital Transformation and Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance from a Human Capital Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    19. Ediz Atmaca & Esra Aktaş & Hafsa Nur Öztürk, 2023. "Evaluated Post-Disaster and Emergency Assembly Areas Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: A Case Study of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Antunes, Jorge & Tan, Yong & Wanke, Peter & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2023. "Impact of R&D and innovation in Chinese road transportation sustainability performance: A novel trigonometric envelopment analysis for ideal solutions (TEA-IS)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1865-:d:1415272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.