IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i11p1641-d1400579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Software Reliability Model Considering a Scale Parameter of the Uncertainty and a New Criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Kwang Yoon Song

    (Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
    Institute of Well-Aging Medicare & Chosun University LAMP Center, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Youn Su Kim

    (Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Hoang Pham

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-8018, USA)

  • In Hong Chang

    (Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly common for software to operate in various environments. However, even if the software performs well in the test phase, uncertain operating environments may cause new software failures. Traditional proposed software reliability models under uncertain operating environments suffer from the problem of being well-suited to special cases due to the large number of assumptions involved. To improve these problems, this study proposes a new software reliability model that assumes an uncertain operating environment. The new software reliability model is a model that minimizes assumptions and minimizes the number of parameters that make up the model, so that the model can be applied to general situations better than the traditional proposed software reliability models. In addition, various criteria based on the difference between the predicted and estimated values have been used in the past to demonstrate the superiority of the software reliability models. Also, we propose a new multi-criteria decision method that can simultaneously consider multiple goodness-of-fit criteria. The multi-criteria decision method using ranking is useful for comprehensive evaluation because it does not rely on individual criteria alone by ranking and weighting multiple criteria for the model. Based on this, 21 existing models are compared with the proposed model using two datasets, and the proposed model is found to be superior for both datasets using 15 criteria and the multi-criteria decision method using ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwang Yoon Song & Youn Su Kim & Hoang Pham & In Hong Chang, 2024. "A Software Reliability Model Considering a Scale Parameter of the Uncertainty and a New Criterion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1641-:d:1400579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lujia Wang & Qingpei Hu & Jian Liu, 2016. "Software reliability growth modeling and analysis with dual fault detection and correction processes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 359-370, April.
    2. Hoang Pham, 2006. "System Software Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-295-9, March.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Collopy, Fred, 1992. "Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 69-80, June.
    4. Dahye Lee & Inhong Chang & Hoang Pham, 2023. "Study of a New Software Reliability Growth Model under Uncertain Operating Environments and Dependent Failures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Green, Kesten C. & Graefe, Andreas, 2015. "Golden rule of forecasting: Be conservative," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1717-1731.
    2. Kumar, V. & Sunder, Sarang & Sharma, Amalesh, 2015. "Leveraging Distribution to Maximize Firm Performance in Emerging Markets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 627-643.
    3. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    4. Garcia-Ferrer, Antonio & Bujosa-Brun, Marcos, 2000. "Forecasting OECD industrial turning points using unobserved components models with business survey data," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 207-227.
    5. Paroissien, Emmanuel, 2020. "Forecasting bulk prices of Bordeaux wines using leading indicators," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 292-309.
    6. Barrow, Devon K., 2016. "Forecasting intraday call arrivals using the seasonal moving average method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6088-6096.
    7. Fildes, Robert & Goodwin, Paul & Lawrence, Michael & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2009. "Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-23.
    8. Aliyeva, Xeniya & Memon, Shazim Ali & Nazir, Kashif & Kim, Jong, 2024. "Energy consumption forecasting in PCM-integration buildings considering building and environmental parameters for future climate scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    9. Kumar, V. & Leone, Robert P. & Gaskins, John N., 1995. "Aggregate and disaggregate sector forecasting using consumer confidence measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 361-377, September.
    10. Rocha Souza, Leonardo & Jorge Soares, Lacir, 2007. "Electricity rationing and public response," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 296-311, March.
    11. Igor Kabashkin & Vitaly Susanin, 2024. "Decision-Making Model for Life Cycle Management of Aircraft Components," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-43, November.
    12. Bontempi, Gianluca & Ben Taieb, Souhaib, 2011. "Conditionally dependent strategies for multiple-step-ahead prediction in local learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 689-699, July.
    13. Bhatti, Muhammad Tousif & Anwar, Arif A. & Ali Shah, Muhammad Azeem, 2019. "Revisiting telemetry in Pakistan’s Indus Basin Irrigation System," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 11(11):1-20.
    14. Kwang Yoon Song & In Hong Chang & Hoang Pham, 2019. "A Testing Coverage Model Based on NHPP Software Reliability Considering the Software Operating Environment and the Sensitivity Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Edward J. Lusk, 2019. "Time Series Forecasting in Stock Trading Markets: The Turning Point Curiosity," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(4), pages 01-16, July.
    16. Schneider, Matthew J. & Gupta, Sachin, 2016. "Forecasting sales of new and existing products using consumer reviews: A random projections approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 243-256.
    17. Garcia-Ferrer, Antonio & Queralt, Ricardo A., 1997. "A note on forecasting international tourism demand in Spain," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 539-549, December.
    18. Blaskowitz, Oliver & Herwartz, Helmut, 2011. "On economic evaluation of directional forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1058-1065, October.
    19. Wagatha, Matthias, 2007. "Integration, Kointegration und die Langzeitprognose von Kreditausfallzyklen [Integration, Cointegration and Long-Horizont Forecasting of Credit-Default-Cycles]," MPRA Paper 8602, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Dean W. Wichern & Benito E. Flores, 2005. "Evaluating forecasts: a look at aggregate bias and accuracy measures," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 433-451.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1641-:d:1400579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.