IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i10p1604-d1398244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Developed Model and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Evaluate Supply Chain Nervousness Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Ghazi M. Magableh

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Hijjawi for Engineering Technology, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan)

  • Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Hijjawi for Engineering Technology, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Liwa College, Abu Dhabi 41009, United Arab Emirates)

  • Taha Rababah

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan)

  • Ali Almajwal

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)

  • Numan Al-Rayyan

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    National Agricultural Research Center, Baq’a 19381, Jordan)

Abstract

Nervousness is thought to be a source of confusion, instability, or uncertainty in SC systems due to disruptions and frequent changes in decisions. Nervousness persists even with consistent SCs, which arise from planning flexibility in response to changes, where responsiveness and customer satisfaction balance. Although the term “nervousness” is well known, to our knowledge no prior research has examined and explored supply chain nervousness strategies (SCNSs). This research explores supply chain nervousness strategies, factors, reduction methods, and recent trends in the supply chain’s relationship with nervousness. The main purpose of this research is to determine the comprehensive and relevant nervousness strategies in the supply chains, especially in light of the unprecedented development and change in business, economics, and technology and the fierce competition. SCN strategies are introduced in a developed model to designate SCN measurements and indicators, mitigation strategies and stages, and management strategies. The fuzzy PROMETHEE method is employed to rank the strategies based on their importance and order of implementation. The suggested method for managing nervousness is then presented with a numerical case, along with the results. The research outcomes indicate that the top five strategies for managing nervousness include planning continuity, utilizing technology, managing nervousness, improving the SC cyber system, and managing supplies. The findings assist decision makers, practitioners, and managers in focusing on SC improvement, resilience, and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Taha Rababah & Ali Almajwal & Numan Al-Rayyan, 2024. "A Developed Model and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Evaluate Supply Chain Nervousness Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1604-:d:1398244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi, 2023. "Global Supply Chain Nervousness (GSCN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Le Teno, J. F. & Mareschal, B., 1998. "An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 522-529, September.
    3. Nadine Kafa & Yasmina Hani & Abederrahman El Mhamedi, 2018. "Evaluating and selecting partners in sustainable supply chain network: a comparative analysis of combined fuzzy multi-criteria approaches," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 14-49, March.
    4. Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Ghazi M. Magableh, 2023. "Unveiling Supply Chain Nervousness: A Strategic Framework for Disruption Management under Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Ghazi M. Magableh, 2023. "Prioritization of Supply Chain Capabilities Using the FAHP Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Satyendra Kumar Sharma & Praveen Ranjan Srivastava & Ajay Kumar & Anil Jindal & Shivam Gupta, 2023. "Supply chain vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 653-683, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahsa Ghandi & Abbas Roozbahani, 2020. "Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 595-615, January.
    2. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Wells, Peter, 2008. "The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: A PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 384-394, June.
    3. Chidozie Chukwuemeka Nwobi-Okoye, 2020. "Modelling the performance of single-input–single-output (SISO) processes using transfer function and fuzzy logic," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(3), pages 815-836, September.
    4. Wendong Jiang, 2024. "Key Selection Factors Influencing Animation Films from the Perspective of the Audience," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    6. Haralambopoulos, D.A. & Polatidis, H., 2003. "Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 961-973.
    7. Batur Sir, G. Didem & Çalışkan, Emre, 2019. "Assessment of development regions for financial support allocation with fuzzy decision making: A case of Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 161-169.
    8. Mahsa Montajabiha, 2016. "An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 221-244, March.
    9. Song, Yuegang & Wang, Ziqi & Song, Changqing & Wang, Jianhua & Liu, Rong, 2024. "Impact of artificial intelligence on renewable energy supply chain vulnerability: Evidence from 61 countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Nadine Kafa & Anicia Jaegler & Joseph Sarkis, 2020. "Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Herrera, F. & Martinez, L. & Sanchez, P. J., 2005. "Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 115-132, October.
    12. Topcu, Y.I & Ulengin, F, 2004. "Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 137-154.
    13. Madjid Tavana & Akram Shaabani & Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga & Iman Raeesi Vanani, 2020. "A Review of Uncertain Decision-Making Methods in Energy Management Using Text Mining and Data Analytics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Ali Sibevei & Pardis Roozkhosh, 2024. "Prioritizing Barriers to Resilience in Blood Supply Chains: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-37, June.
    15. Ulengin, Fusun & Ilker Topcu, Y. & Sahin, Sule Onsel, 2001. "An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 179-192, October.
    16. Dominguez, Roberto & Cannella, Salvatore & Framinan, Jose M., 2021. "Remanufacturing configuration in complex supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Warunvit Auttha & Pongrid Klungboonkrong, 2023. "Evaluation of the Transport Environmental Effects of an Urban Road Network in a Medium-Sized City in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-34, December.
    18. Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi, 2024. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Method for Assessing Crisis Recovery Strategies in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Ghazi M. Magableh, 2023. "Unveiling Supply Chain Nervousness: A Strategic Framework for Disruption Management under Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1604-:d:1398244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.