IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i8p1771-d1118427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal Group Fairness and Accuracy in Automated Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Langenberg

    (Information Systems, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany)

  • Shih-Chi Ma

    (Information Systems, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
    EDIH pro_digital, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 15745 Wildau, Germany)

  • Tatiana Ermakova

    (School of Computing, Communication and Business, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft, University of Applied Sciences for Engineering and Economics, 10318 Berlin, Germany)

  • Benjamin Fabian

    (Information Systems, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
    EDIH pro_digital, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 15745 Wildau, Germany)

Abstract

Most research on fairness in Machine Learning assumes the relationship between fairness and accuracy to be a trade-off, with an increase in fairness leading to an unavoidable loss of accuracy. In this study, several approaches for fair Machine Learning are studied to experimentally analyze the relationship between accuracy and group fairness. The results indicated that group fairness and accuracy may even benefit each other, which emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate measures for performance evaluation. This work provides a foundation for further studies on the adequate objectives of Machine Learning in the context of fair automated decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Langenberg & Shih-Chi Ma & Tatiana Ermakova & Benjamin Fabian, 2023. "Formal Group Fairness and Accuracy in Automated Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1771-:d:1118427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikita Kozodoi & Johannes Jacob & Stefan Lessmann, 2021. "Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implications," Papers 2103.01907, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    2. Richard Berk & Hoda Heidari & Shahin Jabbari & Michael Kearns & Aaron Roth, 2021. "Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 3-44, February.
    3. Kozodoi, Nikita & Jacob, Johannes & Lessmann, Stefan, 2022. "Fairness in credit scoring: Assessment, implementation and profit implications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1083-1094.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Shi & Arno P. J. M. Siebes & Siamak Mehrkanoon, 2023. "TransCORALNet: A Two-Stream Transformer CORAL Networks for Supply Chain Credit Assessment Cold Start," Papers 2311.18749, arXiv.org.
    2. Silvana M. Pesenti & Pietro Millossovich & Andreas Tsanakas, 2023. "Differential Quantile-Based Sensitivity in Discontinuous Models," Papers 2310.06151, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    3. Topuz, Kazim & Urban, Timothy L. & Yildirim, Mehmet B., 2024. "A Markovian score model for evaluating provider performance for continuity of care—An explainable analytics approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 341-351.
    4. Henry Penikas, 2023. "Unaccounted model risk for Basel IRB models deemed acceptable by conventional validation criteria," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Lu, Xuefei & Calabrese, Raffaella, 2023. "The Cohort Shapley value to measure fairness in financing small and medium enterprises in the UK," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    6. Li, Zhe & Liang, Shuguang & Pan, Xianyou & Pang, Meng, 2024. "Credit risk prediction based on loan profit: Evidence from Chinese SMEs," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    7. Piccialli, Veronica & Romero Morales, Dolores & Salvatore, Cecilia, 2024. "Supervised feature compression based on counterfactual analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 273-285.
    8. Zha, Yong & Wang, Yuting & Li, Quan & Yao, Wenying, 2022. "Credit offering strategy and dynamic pricing in the presence of consumer strategic behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 753-766.
    9. Jos'e Pombal & Andr'e F. Cruz & Jo~ao Bravo & Pedro Saleiro & M'ario A. T. Figueiredo & Pedro Bizarro, 2022. "Understanding Unfairness in Fraud Detection through Model and Data Bias Interactions," Papers 2207.06273, arXiv.org.
    10. Dimitrios Nikolaidis & Michalis Doumpos, 2022. "Credit Scoring with Drift Adaptation Using Local Regions of Competence," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Sullivan Hué, 2022. "GAM(L)A: An econometric model for interpretable machine learning," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 19, Stata Users Group.
    12. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Caigny, Arno De & Słowiński, Roman & Baesens, Bart & Boute, Robert N. & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Delen, Dursun & Kraus, Mathias & Lessmann, Stefan & Maldonado, Sebast, 2024. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 249-272.
    13. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    14. Emmanuel Flachaire & Gilles Hacheme & Sullivan Hu'e & S'ebastien Laurent, 2022. "GAM(L)A: An econometric model for interpretable Machine Learning," Papers 2203.11691, arXiv.org.
    15. Lukas Jurgensmeier & Bernd Skiera, 2023. "Measuring Self-Preferencing on Digital Platforms," Papers 2303.14947, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    16. Youmi Suk & Kyung T. Han, 2024. "A Psychometric Framework for Evaluating Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: Differential Algorithmic Functioning," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(2), pages 151-172, April.
    17. Emanuele Aliverti & Kristian Lum & James E. Johndrow & David B. Dunson, 2021. "Removing the influence of group variables in high‐dimensional predictive modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 791-811, July.
    18. Joseph L. Breeden & Eugenia Leonova, 2021. "Creating Unbiased Machine Learning Models by Design," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Federico Fioravanti & Iyad Rahwan & Fernando Abel Tohm'e, 2022. "Classes of Aggregation Rules for Ethical Decision Making in Automated Systems," Papers 2206.05160, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    20. Friedle, Cosima, 2022. "How Can Fairness Tools Impact the Understanding of Fairness and the Processes Within a Machine Learning Development Team?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(5), pages 1289-1300.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1771-:d:1118427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.