IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i7p1736-d1116351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Assessment of Casinos’ Risk of Ruin in Casino Games with Poisson Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Ka-Meng Siu

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macau, China)

  • Ka-Hou Chan

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macau, China)

  • Sio-Kei Im

    (Macao Polytechnic University, Macau, China)

Abstract

Gambling, as an uncertain business involving risks confronting casinos, is commonly analysed using the risk of ruin (ROR) formula. However, due to its brevity, the ROR does not provide any implication of nuances in terms of the distribution of wins/losses, thus causing the potential failure of unravelling exceptional and extreme cases. This paper discusses the mathematical model of ROR using Poisson distribution theory with the consideration of house advantage ( a ) and the law of large numbers in order to compensate for the insufficiency mentioned above. In this discussion, we explore the relationship between cash flow and max bet limits in the model and examine how these factors interact in influencing the risk of casino bankruptcy. In their business nature, casinos operate gambling businesses and capitalize on the house advantage favouring them. The house advantage of the games signifies casinos’ profitability, and in addition, the uncertainty inevitably poses a certain risk of bankruptcy to them even though the house advantage favours them. In this paper, the house advantage is incorporated into our model for a few popular casino games. Furthermore, a set of full-range scales is defined to facilitate effective judgment on the levels of risk confronted by casinos in certain settings. Some wagers of popular casino games are also exemplified with our proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ka-Meng Siu & Ka-Hou Chan & Sio-Kei Im, 2023. "A Study of Assessment of Casinos’ Risk of Ruin in Casino Games with Poisson Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:7:p:1736-:d:1116351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/7/1736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/7/1736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corina Constantinescu & Suhang Dai & Weihong Ni & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2016. "Ruin Probabilities with Dependence on the Number of Claims within a Fixed Time Window," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Willmot, Gordon E., 1994. "Refinements and distributional generalizations of Lundberg's inequality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 49-63, October.
    3. Li, Bo & Ni, Weihong & Constantinescu, Corina, 2015. "Risk models with premiums adjusted to claims number," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 94-102.
    4. Richard Woolley & Charles Livingstone & Kevin Harrigan & Angela Rintoul, 2013. "House edge: hold percentage and the cost of EGM gambling," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 388-402, December.
    5. Thorin, Olof, 1974. "Some Comments on the Sparre Andersen Model in the Risk Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 104-125, September.
    6. Wagner, Christian, 2002. "Time in the red in a two state Markov model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 365-372, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dhiti Osatakul & Xueyuan Wu, 2021. "Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Osatakul, Dhiti & Li, Shuanming & Wu, Xueyuan, 2023. "Discrete-time risk models with surplus-dependent premium corrections," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    3. Wang, Zijia & Landriault, David & Li, Shu, 2021. "An insurance risk process with a generalized income process: A solvency analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 133-146.
    4. Edita Kizinevič & Jonas Šiaulys, 2018. "The Exponential Estimate of the Ultimate Ruin Probability for the Non-Homogeneous Renewal Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Corina Constantinescu & Suhang Dai & Weihong Ni & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2016. "Ruin Probabilities with Dependence on the Number of Claims within a Fixed Time Window," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Willmot, Gordon E., 1997. "Bounds for compound distributions based on mean residual lifetimes and equilibrium distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 25-42, October.
    7. Ambagaspitiya, Rohana S., 2009. "Ultimate ruin probability in the Sparre Andersen model with dependent claim sizes and claim occurrence times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 464-472, June.
    8. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    9. Jon Danielsson & Kevin R. James & Marcela Valenzuela & Ilknur Zer, 2016. "Can We Prove a Bank Guilty of Creating Systemic Risk? A Minority Report," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(4), pages 795-812, June.
    10. Willmot, Gordon E. & Cai, Jun, 2001. "Aging and other distributional properties of discrete compound geometric distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 361-379, June.
    11. Yacine Koucha & Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis, 2021. "Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation," Papers 2107.02537, arXiv.org.
    12. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Xingfang & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "A new uncertain insurance model with variational lower limit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 164-169.
    13. Philip W. S. Newall & Leonardo Weiss-Cohen, 2022. "The Gamblification of Investing: How a New Generation of Investors Is Being Born to Lose," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    14. Lin, X. Sheldon & Willmot, Gordon E., 1999. "Analysis of a defective renewal equation arising in ruin theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 63-84, September.
    15. Stathis Chadjiconsatntinidis, 2024. "Two-sided Bounds for Renewal Equations and Ruin Quantities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-54, June.
    16. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Xenos, Panos, 2022. "Refinements of bounds for tails of compound distributions and ruin probabilities," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 421(C).
    17. Willmot, Gordon E. & Lin, Xiaodong, 1996. "Bounds on the tails of convolutions of compound distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 29-33, May.
    18. Willmot, Gordon E., 1997. "On the relationship between bounds on the tails of compound distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 95-103, April.
    19. Martin Young & Francis Markham, 2017. "Coercive commodities and the political economy of involuntary consumption: The case of the gambling industries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2762-2779, December.
    20. Cai, Jun & Wu, Yanhong, 1997. "Some improvements on the Lundberg bound for the ruin probability," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 395-403, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:7:p:1736-:d:1116351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.