IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i4p836-d1060164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anisotropy-Based Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Method for Hybrid Uncertainty Quantification and Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Structural-Acoustic System

Author

Listed:
  • Shengwen Yin

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Yuan Gao

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Xiaohan Zhu

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Zhonggang Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410082, China)

Abstract

The evaluation of objective functions and component reliability in the optimisation of structural-acoustic systems with random and interval variables is computationally expensive, especially when strong nonlinearity exhibits between the response and input variables. To reduce the computational cost and improve the computational efficiency, a novel anisotropy-based adaptive polynomial chaos (ABAPC) expansion method was developed in this study. In ABAPC, the anisotropy-based polynomial chaos expansion, namely the retained order of polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) differs from each variable, is used to construct the initial surrogate model instead of first-order polynomial chaos expansion in conventional methods. Then, an anisotropy-based adaptive basis growth strategy was developed to reduce the estimation of the coefficients of the polynomial chaos expansion method and increase its computational efficiency. Finally, to solve problems with probabilistic and interval parameters, an adaptive basis truncation strategy was introduced and implemented. Using the ABAPC method, the computational cost of reliability-based design optimisation for structural-acoustic systems can be efficiently reduced. The effectiveness of the proposed method were demonstrated by solving two numerical examples and optimisation problems of a structural-acoustic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengwen Yin & Yuan Gao & Xiaohan Zhu & Zhonggang Wang, 2023. "Anisotropy-Based Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Method for Hybrid Uncertainty Quantification and Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Structural-Acoustic System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:836-:d:1060164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    2. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    3. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    5. Chen, Yaqian & Nakao, Hiroya & Kang, Yanmei, 2024. "Emergence of pathological beta oscillation and its uncertainty quantification in a time-delayed feedback Parkinsonian model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    7. Palar, Pramudita Satria & Zuhal, Lavi Rizki & Shimoyama, Koji, 2023. "Enhancing the explainability of regression-based polynomial chaos expansion by Shapley additive explanations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    10. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    11. Pronzato, Luc, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis via Karhunen–Loève expansion of a random field model: Estimation of Sobol’ indices and experimental design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 93-109.
    12. Hao, Wenrui & Lu, Zhenzhou & Wei, Pengfei, 2013. "Uncertainty importance measure for models with correlated normal variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 48-58.
    13. Pulch, Roland & ter Maten, E. Jan W. & Augustin, Florian, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and model order reduction for random linear dynamical systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 80-95.
    14. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    15. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    16. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    17. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis in high dimensions with PLS-PCE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Deman, G. & Kerrou, J. & Benabderrahmane, H. & Perrochet, P., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of groundwater lifetime expectancy to hydro-dispersive parameters: The case of ANDRA Meuse/Haute-Marne site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 276-286.
    19. Shengwen Yin & Keliang Jin & Yu Bai & Wei Zhou & Zhonggang Wang, 2023. "Solution-Space-Reduction-Based Evidence Theory Method for Stiffness Evaluation of Air Springs with Epistemic Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Zdeněk Kala, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis in Probabilistic Structural Design: A Comparison of Selected Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:836-:d:1060164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.