IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2017i1p55-d124501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Power Structure on Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Li

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yangyang Xu

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Fumin Deng

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Xuedong Liang

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

The present paper examines the manufacturer’s operational decisions, e.g., wholesale price and product sustainability level, the retailer’s operational decision, e.g., retail margin, and supply chain efficiency under three supply chain power structures: manufacturer Stackelberg, Nash and retailer Stackelberg. As a benchmark, we first obtain the equlibrium price and product sustainability level in a vertically integrated supply chain. Our analysis provides some interesting findings in a decentralized supply chain: (i) a dominant manufacturer (retailer) always benefits from its power; (ii) the entire supply chain earns the most profit from the Nash game, and the least from the retailer Stackelberg game, respectively; (iii) as the power shifts from the manufacturer to the retailer, product sustainability and retail price increase; (iv) dominant manufacturer does not necessarily imply low wholesale price that would benefit the retailer. Managerial insights are provided for the manufacturer and the retailer, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Li & Yangyang Xu & Fumin Deng & Xuedong Liang, 2017. "Impacts of Power Structure on Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:55-:d:124501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Peng & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2013. "Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 572-581.
    2. Albert Ha & Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2016. "Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 280-298, May.
    3. Xue, Weili & Caliskan Demirag, Ozgun & Niu, Baozhuang, 2014. "Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 130-145.
    4. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 243-243, December.
    5. Xu Chen & Xiaojun Wang & Xinkuang Jiang, 2016. "The impact of power structure on the retail service supply chain with an O2O mixed channel," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(2), pages 294-301, February.
    6. Kenneth Baltzer, 2011. "Minimum Quality Standards and International Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(5), pages 936-949, November.
    7. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    8. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-130, November.
    9. Ciwei Dong & Bin Shen & Pui-Sze Chow & Liu Yang & Chi To Ng, 2016. "Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 509-531, May.
    10. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai, 2017. "Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 268-281.
    11. Hongyan Shi & Yunchuan Liu & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2013. "Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1162-1176, May.
    12. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    13. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    14. Grimmer, Martin & Bingham, Timothy, 2013. "Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1945-1953.
    15. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    16. Mahesh Nagarajan & Greys Sošić, 2009. "Coalition Stability in Assembly Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 131-145, February.
    17. Pan, Kewen & Lai, K.K. & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Xiao, Di, 2010. "Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 532-538, June.
    18. Erica L. Plambeck & L. Beril Toktay, 2013. "Introduction to the Special Issue on the Environment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 523-526, October.
    19. Zhaoxia Guo & Haitao Liu & Dongqing Zhang & Jing Yang, 2017. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Apparel Manufacturing Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Li, Guo & Li, Lin & Sun, Jiasen, 2019. "Pricing and service effort strategy in a dual-channel supply chain with showrooming effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 32-48.
    3. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    4. Deepak Singhal & Sarat Kumar Jena & Satyabrata Aich & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Remanufacturing for Circular Economy: Understanding the Impact of Manufacturer’s Incentive under Price Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Elena Candelo & Cecilia Casalegno & Chiara Civera & Fabrizio Mosca, 2018. "Turning Farmers into Business Partners through Value Co-Creation Projects. Insights from the Coffee Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Karel Doubravský & Alena Kocmanová & Mirko Dohnal, 2018. "Analysis of Sustainability Decision Trees Generated by Qualitative Models Based on Equationless Heuristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Peter Mutiso Maundu, 2022. "The Charism of Prophecy and Poverty Eradication: A Reaction to Lugino Bruni’s Article on Economy and Communion," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 277-282, September.
    8. Changhong Li & Jiani Gao & Jiaqi Guo & Jialuo Wang, 2022. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Decisions Considering Carbon Emissions Right Pledge Financing in Different Power Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiutian Shi & Yuan Qian & Ciwei Dong, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Performance of Fashion Supply Chain: The Joint Effect of Power Structure and Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Xuyue Li, 2018. "Competing Retailers’ Environmental Investment: An Analysis under Different Power Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Xiutian Shi & Xiaoli Zhang & Ciwei Dong & Subin Wen, 2018. "Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Zha, Yong & Wu, Xiangxiang & Liu, Haonan & Yu, Yugang, 2023. "Impact of a Platform Developer's Entry on the Device Manufacturer with Different Power Structures and Revenue Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Xiaojie Yang & Li Liu & Yi Zheng & Xue Yang & Shanlin Sun, 2022. "Pricing Problems in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain with Mixed Channel: A Power Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    7. Zheng He & Shuchen Ni & Xue Jiang & Chun Feng, 2023. "The Influence of Demand Fluctuation and Competition Intensity on Advantages of Supply Chain Dominance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Lee, Eunji & Minner, Stefan, 2024. "How power structure and markup schemes impact supply chain channel efficiency under price-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 297-309.
    9. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yang, Feng, 2015. "Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 174-191.
    10. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Chen, Jing & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 437-451.
    11. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    12. Li, Hai & Shao, Jing & Zhu, Stuart X., 2018. "Parallel importation in a supply Chain: The impact of gray market structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 220-241.
    13. Wan, Xing & Chen, Jing & Li, Wei, 2023. "The impact of retail pricing leadership under manufacturer encroachment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 217-237.
    14. Zhang, Jianqiang & Cao, Qingning & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Contract and product quality in platform selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 928-944.
    15. Yanping Cheng & Yunjuan Kuang & Xiutian Shi & Ciwei Dong, 2018. "Sustainable Investment in a Supply Chain in the Big Data Era: An Information Updating Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    17. Jin, Yannan & Wang, Sujuan & Hu, Qiying, 2015. "Contract type and decision right of sales promotion in supply chain management with a capital constrained retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 415-424.
    18. Kishita, Yusuke & Mizuno, Yuji & Fukushige, Shinichi & Umeda, Yasushi, 2020. "Scenario structuring methodology for computer-aided scenario design: An application to envisioning sustainable futures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Chung, Hwan & Lee, Eunkyu, 2017. "Asymmetric relationships with symmetric suppliers: Strategic choice of supply chain price leadership in a competitive market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 564-575.
    20. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuping, 2016. "Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 325-341.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:55-:d:124501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.