IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i18p3815-d1233529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving the Problem of Reducing the Audiences’ Favor toward an Educational Institution by Using a Combination of Hard and Soft Operations Research Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Xu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Economics and Management, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah

    (Department of Mathematics, Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon 46818-53617, Iran)

  • Ali Sorourkhah

    (Department of Management, Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon 46818-53617, Iran)

Abstract

Because of hyper-complexity, a difficulty to define, multiple stakeholders with conflicting perspectives, and a lack of clear-cut solutions, wicked problems necessitate innovative and adaptive strategies. Operations research (OR) has been a valuable tool for managers to make informed decisions for years. However, as we face increasingly complex and messy problems, it has become apparent that relying solely on either hard or soft OR approaches is no longer sufficient. We need to explore more innovative methodologies to address these wicked problems effectively. This study has bridged the research gap by proposing a structured process encompassing a subdivision-based problem structuring method for defining the wicked problem, a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) for prioritizing subproblems, and a hard OR technique, data envelopment analysis (DEA) for tackling one of the most critical subdivisions. The proposed methodology, the subdivision-based problem structuring method (SPSM), implemented in a case study, focuses on a higher education institution experiencing a decline in student admissions and involves five steps. First, a diverse group of stakeholders is formed to ensure the comprehensive consideration of perspectives. Second, the wicked problem is defined, considering long-term consequences, multiple stakeholders, and qualitative stakeholder opinions. Third, a hierarchical structure is created to break down the wicked problem into manageable subproblems. Fourth, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method prioritizes subproblems. Finally, the subproblems are addressed one by one using a combination of soft and hard OR tools. The findings highlight the benefits of integrating hard and soft OR approaches. The study concludes with reflections on the implications of using a combined OR approach to tackle wicked problems in higher education and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Xu & Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah & Ali Sorourkhah, 2023. "Solving the Problem of Reducing the Audiences’ Favor toward an Educational Institution by Using a Combination of Hard and Soft Operations Research Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:18:p:3815-:d:1233529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/18/3815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/18/3815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Chris M. & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 403-416.
    2. Anthony Alexander & Helen Walker & Izabela Delabre, 2022. "A Decision Theory Perspective on Wicked Problems, SDGs and Stakeholders: The Case of Deforestation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 975-995, November.
    3. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    4. Yasmim Maia Pederneiras & Johann Meckenstock & Ana Isabel Cerqueira Carvalho & Ana Paula Barbosa‐Póvoa, 2022. "The wicked problem of sustainable development in supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 46-58, January.
    5. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Pluchinotta, Irene & Salvia, Giuseppe & Zimmermann, Nici, 2022. "The importance of eliciting stakeholders’ system boundary perceptions for problem structuring and decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 280-293.
    7. Maren Berge Vik & Hanne Finnestrand & Robert L. Flood, 2022. "Systemic Problem Structuring in a Complex Hospital Environment using Viable System Diagnosis – Keeping the Blood Flowing," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 203-226, April.
    8. Li, Yina & Liang, Chenchen & Ye, Fei & Zhao, Xiande, 2023. "Designing government subsidy schemes to promote the electric vehicle industry: A system dynamics model perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins & Sergio Orlando Antoun Netto & Maria Stella Castro Lobo, 2019. "Multimethodology applied to the evaluation of Healthcare in Brazilian municipalities," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 197-214, June.
    10. Dongmei Jing & Mohsen Imeni & Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah & Alhanouf Alburaikan & Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, 2023. "Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Lami, Isabella M. & Tavella, Elena, 2019. "On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1020-1036.
    12. Silal, Sheetal Prakash, 2021. "Operational research: A multidisciplinary approach for the management of infectious disease in a global context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 929-934.
    13. Rahmin Bender-Salazar, 2023. "Design thinking as an effective method for problem-setting and needfinding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Pessôa, Leonardo Antonio Monteiro & Lins, Marcos Pereira Estellita & da Silva, Angela Cristina Moreira & Fiszman, Roberto, 2015. "Integrating soft and hard operational research to improve surgical centre management at a university hospital," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 851-861.
    15. Ian R. Hodgkinson & Sahar Mousavi & Paul Hughes, 2022. "New development: Citizen science—discovering (new) solutions to wicked problems," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 133-136, February.
    16. Fernanda Rodrigues Siqueira & Carlos André Silva Müller & Fábio Rogério Morais, 2023. "Public marketing to face wicked problems: theoretical essay for conceptual model construction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 477-489, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shun Cao, 2023. "Effects of Search Strategies on Collective Problem-Solving," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Capolongo & Leopoldo Sdino & Marta Dell’Ovo & Rossella Moioli & Stefano Della Torre, 2019. "How to Assess Urban Regeneration Proposals by Considering Conflicting Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    3. Lami, Isabella M. & Todella, Elena, 2023. "A multi-methodological combination of the strategic choice approach and the analytic network process: From facts to values and vice versa," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 802-812.
    4. Konrad, Renata A. & Maass, Kayse Lee & Dimas, Geri L. & Trapp, Andrew C., 2023. "Perspectives on how to conduct responsible anti-human trafficking research in operations and analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 319-329.
    5. Stephen Harwood, 2021. "Introducing the VIPLAN Methodology (with VSM) for Handling Messy Situations – Nine Lessons," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 635-668, December.
    6. Das, Saikat & Bose, Indranil & Sarkar, Uttam Kumar, 2023. "Predicting the outbreak of epidemics using a network-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 819-831.
    7. Bruno M. B. Pinto & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Ronald W. Spahr & Mark A. Sunderman & Leandro F. Pereira, 2023. "Analyzing causes of urban blight using cognitive mapping and DEMATEL," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1083-1110, June.
    8. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    9. Markus Niehaus & Marian Mocan, 2024. "Cultivating Design Thinking for Sustainable Business Transformation in a VUCA World: Insights from a German Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Emmanuel D. Adamides & Konstantinos Georgousoglou & Yannis Mouzakitis, 2023. "Designing a Flexible and Adaptive Municipal Waste Management Organisation Using the Viable System Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Lowe, David & Espinosa, Angela & Yearworth, Mike, 2020. "Constitutive rules for guiding the use of the viable system model: Reflections on practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1014-1035.
    13. Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios & Dayana Milena Coba-Blanco & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz & Daniela Stand-González, 2021. "Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-31, August.
    14. Elaine Fouché & Alan Brent, 2020. "Explore, Design and Act for Sustainability: A Participatory Planning Approach for Local Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Elena Bakhanova & Jaime A. Garcia & William L. Raffe & Alexey Voinov, 2023. "Gamification Framework for Participatory Modeling: A Proposal," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1167-1182, October.
    16. Isabella M. Lami & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "How Can I Help You? Questioning the Role of Evaluation Techniques in Democratic Decision-Making Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Siebert, Johannes Ulrich & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Rolf, Philipp, 2021. "Effects of decision training on individuals’ decision-making proactivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 264-282.
    18. Grace Ximena Villanueva-Paredes & Camila Rosario Juarez-Alvarez & Carla Cuya-Zevallos & Elizabeth Susan Mamani-Machaca & Jose David Esquicha-Tejada, 2024. "Enhancing Social Innovation Through Design Thinking, Challenge-Based Learning, and Collaboration in University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    20. Arben Asllani & Silvana Trimi, 2022. "COVID-19 vaccine distribution: exploring strategic alternatives for the greater good," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 601-619, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:18:p:3815-:d:1233529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.