IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i17p3723-d1228339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freshness-Keeping Strategy of Logistics Service Providers: The Role of the Interaction between Blockchain and Overconfidence

Author

Listed:
  • Hongbo Tu

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Mo Pang

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Lin Chen

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

As a result of the increasing scrutiny of fresh products, greengrocers are now forced to concern themselves with the deterioration of their products’ freshness and employ blockchain technology as a tracing system. However, in the logistics system, the third-party logistics service provider (LSP) is motivated to be overconfident in order to extract extra profits, thus intensifying the dilemma faced by the fresh agricultural product industry. This paper focuses on the association between blockchain technology and overconfidence, in which the third-party LSP is supposed to overestimate the effect of the retailer’s freshness keeping measures. Differing from the previous literature, we analyze a situation wherein blockchain technology is adopted with explicit execution. Based on the optimal control model, we obtained three main conclusions: First, the overconfidence of a third-party LSP does not damage the logistics system but changes the freshness-keeping strategy of the retailer. Second, interestingly, although blockchain technology performs effectively when it is adopted as an initially established system with a freshness keeping strategy, it is not always a wise decision for managers to adopt a blockchain, especially when adopting it as a countermeasure for overconfidence. Third, we found that blockchain technology has a greater effect on freshness-keeping than overconfidence. Thus, in the fresh agricultural product industry, managers should adopt blockchain technology before overconfidence occurs and pay more attention to exogenous prices and freight to decide whether to adopt blockchain technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongbo Tu & Mo Pang & Lin Chen, 2023. "Freshness-Keeping Strategy of Logistics Service Providers: The Role of the Interaction between Blockchain and Overconfidence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-35, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3723-:d:1228339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zennyo, Yusuke, 2020. "Strategic contracting and hybrid use of agency and wholesale contracts in e-commerce platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 231-239.
    2. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Biswas, Debajyoti & Jalali, Hamed & Ansaripoor, Amir H. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2023. "Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: The implications of blockchain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 128-147.
    4. Simon Gervais & J. B. Heaton & Terrance Odean, 2011. "Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(5), pages 1735-1777, October.
    5. Yi Yang & Youhua (Frank) Chen & Yun Zhou, 2014. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies Under Batch Ordering," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 25-37, February.
    6. Xue-Yan Wu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Bing-Bing Cao, 2023. "An analysis of strategies for adopting blockchain technology in the fresh product supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 3717-3734, June.
    7. Mark Ferguson & Michael E. Ketzenberg, 2006. "Information Sharing to Improve Retail Product Freshness of Perishables," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 15(1), pages 57-73, March.
    8. Bing-Bing Cao & Mei-Fei Zhu & Quan Tian, 2022. "Optimal Operation Policies in a Cross-Regional Fresh Product Supply Chain with Regional Government Subsidy Heterogeneity to Blockchain-Driven Traceability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-40, December.
    9. Du, Xianjin & Zhan, Huimin & Zhu, Xiaoxuan & He, Xiuli, 2021. "The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Anjos, Miguel F. & Cheng, Russell C. H. & Currie, Christine S. M., 2005. "Optimal pricing policies for perishable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 246-254, October.
    11. Hao, Zhongyuan & Li, Juan & Cai, Jinling, 2023. "Allocation of inventory responsibilities in overconfident supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 207-221.
    12. Wang, Lingling & Wu, Yong & Hu, Shengqiang, 2021. "Make-to-order supply chain coordination through option contract with random yields and overconfidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Xu, Xiaoping & Yan, Luling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "When Is It Wise to Use Blockchain for Platform Operations with Remanufacturing?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1073-1090.
    14. Xin Chen & Zhan Pang & Limeng Pan, 2014. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies for Perishable Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 284-300, April.
    15. Zhangwei Feng & Peng Jin & Guiping Li, 2023. "Investment Decision of Blockchain Technology in Fresh Food Supply Chains Considering Misreporting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Lin Chen & Ting Dong & Jin Peng & Dan Ralescu, 2023. "Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-45, May.
    17. Yu, Yunlong & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2021. "Analysis of cold-chain service outsourcing modes in a fresh agri-product supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Tianjian Yang & Chunmei Li & Xiongping Yue & Beibei Zhang, 2022. "Decisions for Blockchain Adoption and Information Sharing in a Low Carbon Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiajun He & Yiming Zhao & Beijia Zhang & Lin Chen & Xiuxiu Ma, 2025. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology on Green Investment Decisions for a Sustainable Supply Chain with an Overconfident Manufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbon, Avi, 2017. "Should retailers hold a perishable product having different ages? The case of a homogeneous market and multiplicative demand model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 479-490.
    2. Lu, Qihui & Liao, Changhua & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2024. "The blockchain adoption strategies of online retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    3. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal, 2019. "Pricing and advertising in a supply chain of perishable products under asymmetric information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-264.
    4. Yuqian Xu & Lingjiong Zhu & Michael Pinedo, 2020. "Operational Risk Management: A Stochastic Control Framework with Preventive and Corrective Controls," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1804-1825, November.
    5. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3180-3197, August.
    6. Jinhan Yu & Licheng Sun, 2022. "Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Sasanuma, Katsunobu & Delasay, Mohammad & Pitocco, Christine & Scheller-Wolf, Alan & Sexton, Thomas, 2022. "A marginal analysis framework to incorporate the externality effect of ordering perishables," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    8. Gurkan, M. Edib & Tunc, Huseyin & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2022. "The joint stochastic lot sizing and pricing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Cong Shi, 2021. "Nonparametric Learning Algorithms for Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Lost Sales and Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 726-756, May.
    10. Zhen Xu & Jiheng Zhang & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2019. "Instantaneous Control of Brownian Motion with a Positive Lead Time," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 943-965, August.
    11. Xiuyan Ma, 2019. "Pricing to the Scenario: Price-Setting Newsvendor Models for Innovative Products," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Jiang, Li & Hao, Zhongyuan, 2024. "Holding diverse market beliefs by firms: Information flow, profit performances, and channel structure," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Xu, Xiaoping & Guo, Shunan & Cheng, T.C.E. & Du, Pengcheng, 2023. "The choice between the agency and reselling modes considering green technology with the cap-and-trade scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Peng Hu & Ye Lu & Miao Song, 2019. "Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Fixed and Convex/Concave Variable Production Costs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 847-877, April.
    15. Lu, Qihui & Liao, Changhua & Chen, Meilan & Shi, Victor & Hu, Xiangling & Hu, Weiwei, 2024. "Platform financing or bank financing in agricultural supply chains: The impact of platform digital empowerment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 952-964.
    16. Li, Mengmeng & Mizuno, Shinji, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management of a dual-channel supply chain under different power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 273-285.
    17. Di Wang & Weihua Liu & Yanjie Liang, 2024. "Green innovation in logistics service supply chain: the impacts of relationship strength and overconfidence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(3), pages 949-979, December.
    18. Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2015. "Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 397-416, March.
    19. Wang, Huihui & Yu, Yimin & Zhang, Wei & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2019. "Procurement strategies for lost-sales inventory systems with all-units discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 539-548.
    20. Jianhua Zhu & Taiwen Feng & Ying Lu & Wenbo Jiang, 2024. "Using blockchain or not? A focal firm's blockchain strategy in the context of carbon emission reduction technology innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3505-3531, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3723-:d:1228339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.