IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i16p3590-d1220501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Location-Based Crowdsensing Incentive Mechanism Based on Ensemble Learning and Prospect Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Liu

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Hucheng Xu

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xiaoheng Deng

    (School of Electronic Information, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Hui Liu

    (Computer Science Department, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897, USA)

  • Deng Li

    (School of Electronic Information, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Crowdsensing uses the participants’ smart devices to form a new perception network. The coverage of crowdsensing’s tasks determines the quality of services. Under the constraint of budget and the number of participants, the platform needs to increase the participation duration of participants through incentive mechanisms to increase the coverage of tasks. There are two problems with the existing incentive mechanisms: (1) many incentives ignore the participants’ characteristics, and using a single incentive mechanism for different participants will make the incentive effect not reach the expectation; (2) many incentives will affect the effectiveness because of the decision problem caused by asymmetric information. Inspired by ensemble learning and prospect theory, this paper proposes the Incentive Mechanism based on Ensemble Learning and Prospect Theory (IMELPT). First, we propose the Deep-Stacking-Generation algorithm based on Dropout (DSGD), to predict the participants and distinguish whether they are long-term or short-term participants. If the participants are short-term, we incentivize them through the Short-term Participant Incentive Mechanism based on Prospect Theory (SPIMPT). We increase the participation duration by transforming the change in reward into asymmetric information that aligns the participant’s goal with the platform. If the participants are long-term participants, we motivate them through the Long-term Participant Incentive Mechanism (LPIM), to maintain the participation rate of participants by maximizing their utility. Theoretical analysis and experiments on real datasets demonstrated that IMELPT can reliably improve the coverage of crowdsensing tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Liu & Hucheng Xu & Xiaoheng Deng & Hui Liu & Deng Li, 2023. "A Location-Based Crowdsensing Incentive Mechanism Based on Ensemble Learning and Prospect Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3590-:d:1220501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoyu Qu & Xiao Wang & Xutian Qin, 2023. "Research on Responsible Innovation Mechanism Based on Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Yu Liu & Dong Cai & Chunxiang Guo & Haizhen Huang, 2020. "Evolutionary Game of Government Subsidy Strategy for Prefabricated Buildings Based on Prospect Theory," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-10, November.
    3. Katja Gelbrich & Holger Roschk, 2011. "Do complainants appreciate overcompensation? A meta-analysis on the effect of simple compensation vs. overcompensation on post-complaint satisfaction," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 31-47, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre-Nicolas Schwab, 2015. "Online complaint handling practices: Company strategies and their effects upon post-complaint satisfaction," Working Papers CEB 15-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Baliga, Ashwin J. & Chawla, Vaibhav & Sunder M, Vijaya & Ganesh, L.S. & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj, 2021. "Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 763-781.
    3. Tessa Haesevoets & Alain Van Hiel & Mario Pandelaere & Dries H. Bostyn & David De Cremer, 2017. "How much compensation is too much? An investigation of the effectiveness of financial overcompensation as a means to enhance customer loyalty," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(2), pages 183-197, March.
    4. Siret, Iris & Sabadie, William, 2022. "Public complaining: A blessing in disguise? Educational calling as a benevolent process that gives consumers voice on brands’ social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 476-490.
    5. Roschk, Holger & Müller, Jana & Gelbrich, Katja, 2013. "Age matters: How developmental stages of adulthood affect customer reaction to complaint handling efforts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 154-164.
    6. Haesevoets, Tessa & Van Hiel, Alain & Reinders Folmer, Chris & De Cremer, David, 2014. "What money can’t buy: The psychology of financial overcompensation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 83-95.
    7. Chao Miao & Michael J. Barone & Shanshan Qian & Ronald H. Humphrey, 2019. "Emotional intelligence and service quality: a meta-analysis with initial evidence on cross-cultural factors and future research directions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 335-347, December.
    8. Zsofia Kenesei & Zsofia Bali, 2020. "Overcompensation as a service recovery strategy: the financial aspect of customers’ extra effort," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(2), pages 187-216, June.
    9. Pierre-Nicolas Schwab & Sandra Rothenberger, 2015. "Online Complaint Handling: The Effects of Politeness and Grammaticality upon Perceived Professionalism and Loyalty," Working Papers CEB 15-015, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Gelbrich, Katja & Gäthke, Jana & Grégoire, Yany, 2016. "How a firm's best versus normal customers react to compensation after a service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4331-4339.
    11. Guoyong Yue & Zijian Zhao & Lei Dai & Hao Hu, 2024. "Research on Intercity Railway Subsidy Mechanism Optimization from the Perspective of a Government–Company Game Model: A Case Study of Henan Intercity Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Jasenko Arsenovic & Bo Edvardsson & Tobias Otterbring & Bård Tronvoll, 2023. "Money for Nothing: The Impact of Compensation on Customers’ Bad-Mouthing in Service Recovery Encounters," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 69-82, March.
    13. Yu-Li Lin & Hsiu-Wen Liu & Phuoc-Thi Ngo, 2016. "Silence is not Golden: The Effects of Prohibitive Voice on Customer Citizenship Behaviors," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 24-33, September.
    14. Feng Li & Xuewan Du & Pengchao Zhang & Huimin Li & Xiaoxia Fei, 2023. "Co-Evolutionary Mechanism of Stakeholders’ Strategies in Comprehensive Agricultural Water Price Reform: The View of Evolutionary Game Based on Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    15. Xinpei Qiao & Hyukku Lee & Qi Shen & Yuchao Li, 2023. "Research on the Tripartite Evolutionary Game of Zero-Waste City Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Paolo Antonetti & Ilaria Baghi, 2023. "Projecting lower competence to boost apology effectiveness: Underlying mechanism and boundary conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 695-715, May.
    17. Passos, Gisèle, 2013. "La vengeance du consommateur insatisfait sur Internet et l'effet sur les attitudes des autres consommateurs," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/11827 edited by Le Nagard, Emmanuelle.
    18. Kobel, Sarah & Groeppel-Klein, Andrea, 2021. "No laughing matter, or a secret weapon? Exploring the effect of humor in service failure situations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 260-269.
    19. Song, Yang & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Tian, Yifan & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Sourav Bikash Borah & Srinivas Prakhya & Amalesh Sharma, 2020. "Leveraging service recovery strategies to reduce customer churn in an emerging market," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 848-868, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3590-:d:1220501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.