IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i14p3122-d1194452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Citizens View Digital Government Services? Study on Digital Government Service Quality Based on Citizen Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Ye

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116081, China)

  • Xiaoyan Su

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116081, China)

  • Zhijun Yao

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116081, China)

  • Lu-an Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116081, China)

  • Qiang Lin

    (School of Software Technology, Dalian University of Science and Technology, Dalian 116030, China)

  • Shuo Yu

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116081, China)

Abstract

Research on government service quality can help ensure the success of digital government services and has been the focus of numerous studies that proposed different frameworks and approaches. Most of the existing studies are based on traditional researcher-led methods, which struggle to capture the needs of citizens. In this paper, a citizen-feedback-based analysis framework was proposed to explore citizen demands and analyze the service quality of digital government. Citizen feedback data are a direct expression of citizens’ demands, so the citizen-feedback-based framework can help to obtain more targeted management insights and improve citizen satisfaction. Efficient machine learning methods used in the framework make data collection and processing more efficient, especially for large-scale internet data. With the crawled user feedback data from the Q&A e-government portal of Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China, we conducted experiments on the proposed framework to verify its feasibility. From citizens’ online feedback on Q&A services, we extracted five service quality factors: efficiency, quality, attitude, compliance, and execution of response. The analysis of five service quality factors provides some management insights, which can provide a guide for improvements in Q&A services.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Ye & Xiaoyan Su & Zhijun Yao & Lu-an Dong & Qiang Lin & Shuo Yu, 2023. "How Do Citizens View Digital Government Services? Study on Digital Government Service Quality Based on Citizen Feedback," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3122-:d:1194452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chatterjee, Swagato & Goyal, Divesh & Prakash, Atul & Sharma, Jiwan, 2021. "Exploring healthcare/health-product ecommerce satisfaction: A text mining and machine learning application," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 815-825.
    2. Stuart J. Barnes & Richard Vidgen, 2004. "Interactive E-Government: Evaluating the Web Site of the UK Inland Revenue," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 42-63, January.
    3. Yueping Zheng & Hindy Lauer Schachter, 2017. "Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 409-428, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Zhang & Qiang Wang & Jian Li & Zhenzhong Ma & Gokul Bhandari & Rui Peng, 2023. "What makes deceptive online reviews? A linguistic analysis perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Abumalloh, Rabab Ali & Samad, Sarminah & Alrizq, Mesfer & Alyami, Sultan & Abosaq, Hamad & Alghamdi, Abdullah & Akib, Noor Adelyna Mohammed, 2022. "Factors impacting customer purchase intention of smart home security systems: Social data analysis using machine learning techniques," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Marina Covalenco (Dobrovolschi), 2024. "Health Tourism Industry: Segmentation, Differentiation and Communication," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 418-425, August.
    4. Yueping Zheng & Liang Ma, 2022. "How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1407-1433, December.
    5. Çiğdem Sıcakyüz, 2023. "Analyzing Healthcare and Wellness Products’ Quality Embedded in Online Customer Reviews: Assessment with a Hybrid Fuzzy LMAW and Fermatean Fuzzy WASPAS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-41, February.
    6. Markus Binder & Bernd Heinrich & Marcus Hopf & Alexander Schiller, 2022. "Global reconstruction of language models with linguistic rules – Explainable AI for online consumer reviews," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2123-2138, December.
    7. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Osman, Ibrahim H. & Anouze, Abdel Latef & Irani, Zahir & Lee, Habin & Medeni, Tunç D. & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2019. "A cognitive analytics management framework for the transformation of electronic government services from users’ perspective to create sustainable shared values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 514-532.
    9. Hu, Hui & Xu, Jiajun & Liu, Mengqi & Lim, Ming K., 2023. "Vaccine supply chain management: An intelligent system utilizing blockchain, IoT and machine learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. John Coffie Azamela & Zhiwei Tang & Owusu Ackah & Swanzy Awozum, 2022. "Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    11. Viswanath Venkatesh & James Y. L. Thong & Frank K. Y. Chan & Paul J. H. Hu, 2016. "Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 87-111, March.
    12. Zaman, Mustafeed & Vo-Thanh, Tan & Nguyen, Chi T.K. & Hasan, Rajibul & Akter, Shahriar & Mariani, Marcello & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2023. "Motives for posting fake reviews: Evidence from a cross-cultural comparison," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Ruan, Yanya & Mezei, József, 2022. "When do AI chatbots lead to higher customer satisfaction than human frontline employees in online shopping assistance? Considering product attribute type," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Petrescu, Maria & Ajjan, Haya & Harrison, Dana L., 2023. "Man vs machine – Detecting deception in online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Minnu F. Pynadath & T. M. Rofin & Sam Thomas, 2023. "Evolution of customer relationship management to data mining-based customer relationship management: a scientometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3241-3272, August.
    16. Pal, Shounak & Biswas, Baidyanath & Gupta, Rohit & Kumar, Ajay & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Exploring the factors that affect user experience in mobile-health applications: A text-mining and machine-learning approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Ngai, Eric W.T. & Wu, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Machine learning in marketing: A literature review, conceptual framework, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 35-48.
    18. T. M. Rofin & Sreejith Alathur, 2024. "Optimal online channel configuration for a Manufacturer under price and lead time-sensitive demand," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 121-139, April.
    19. Shugang Li & Fang Liu & Yuqi Zhang & Boyi Zhu & He Zhu & Zhaoxu Yu, 2022. "Text Mining of User-Generated Content (UGC) for Business Applications in E-Commerce: A Systematic Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Filipiak Beata Zofia & Dylewski Marek, 2018. "A Real Or a Marginal Trend in Participatory Budgets in Local Governments," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 12-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3122-:d:1194452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.