IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i11p2553-d1162343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divide and Conquer: A Location-Allocation Approach to Sectorization

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Lopes

    (CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ana Maria Rodrigues

    (CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal
    INESC TEC, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Valeria Romanciuc

    (Millennium BCP, 1050-059 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • José Soeiro Ferreira

    (INESC TEC, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    FEUP—Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Elif Göksu Öztürk

    (INESC TEC, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Cristina Oliveira

    (CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Sectorization is concerned with dividing a large territory into smaller areas, also known as sectors. This process usually simplifies a complex problem, leading to easier solution approaches to solving the resulting subproblems. Sectors are built with several criteria in mind, such as equilibrium, compactness, contiguity, and desirability, which vary with the applications. Sectorization appears in different contexts: sales territory design, political districting, healthcare logistics, and vehicle routing problems (agrifood distribution, winter road maintenance, parcel delivery). Environmental problems can also be tackled with a sectorization approach; for example, in municipal waste collection, water distribution networks, and even in finding more sustainable transportation routes. This work focuses on sectorization concerning the location of the area’s centers and allocating basic units to each sector. Integer programming models address the location-allocation problems, and various formulations implementing different criteria are compared. Methods to deal with multiobjective optimization problems, such as the ϵ -constraint, the lexicographic, and the weighted sum methods, are applied and compared. Computational results obtained for a set of benchmarking instances of sectorization problems are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Lopes & Ana Maria Rodrigues & Valeria Romanciuc & José Soeiro Ferreira & Elif Göksu Öztürk & Cristina Oliveira, 2023. "Divide and Conquer: A Location-Allocation Approach to Sectorization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2553-:d:1162343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murat Köksalan & Banu Lokman, 2015. "Finding nadir points in multi-objective integer programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 55-77, May.
    2. M. Ehrgott & S. Ruzika, 2008. "Improved ε-Constraint Method for Multiobjective Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 375-396, September.
    3. Bouzarth, Elizabeth L. & Forrester, Richard & Hutson, Kevin R. & Reddoch, Lattie, 2018. "Assigning students to schools to minimize both transportation costs and socioeconomic variation between schools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Vincent F. Yu & Grace Aloina & Hadi Susanto & Mohammad Khoirul Effendi & Shih-Wei Lin, 2022. "Regional Location Routing Problem for Waste Collection Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Simulated Annealing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Zhen, Lu & Gao, Jiajing & Tan, Zheyi & Laporte, Gilbert & Baldacci, Roberto, 2023. "Territorial design for customers with demand frequency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 82-101.
    6. Alves, Maria João & Costa, João Paulo, 2009. "An exact method for computing the nadir values in multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 637-646, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    2. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Özgür Özpeynirci, 2017. "On nadir points of multiobjective integer programming problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 699-712, November.
    4. Liu, Yubin & Ye, Qiming & Escribano-Macias, Jose & Feng, Yuxiang & Candela, Eduardo & Angeloudis, Panagiotis, 2023. "Route planning for last-mile deliveries using mobile parcel lockers: A hybrid q-learning network approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Murat Köksalan & Banu Lokman, 2015. "Finding nadir points in multi-objective integer programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 55-77, May.
    6. Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2017. "Multi-objective branch and bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 856-872.
    7. Yuxin Liu & Zihang Qin & Jin Liu, 2023. "An Improved Genetic Algorithm for the Granularity-Based Split Vehicle Routing Problem with Simultaneous Delivery and Pickup," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Doğan, Ilgın & Lokman, Banu & Köksalan, Murat, 2022. "Representing the nondominated set in multi-objective mixed-integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 804-818.
    9. Ao Lv & Baofeng Sun, 2022. "Multi-Objective Robust Optimization for the Sustainable Location-Inventory-Routing Problem of Auto Parts Supply Logistics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Steuer, Ralph E. & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Non-contour efficient fronts for identifying most preferred portfolios in sustainability investing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 742-753.
    11. Vandana Goyal & Namrata Rani & Deepak Gupta, 2022. "An algorithm for quadratically constrained multi-objective quadratic fractional programming with pentagonal fuzzy numbers," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 32(1), pages 49-71.
    12. Sergio García García & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Marina Díaz Piloñeta & Susana Torno Lougedo, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Steel Off-Gas in Cogeneration Using the ε-Constraint Method: A Combined Coke Oven and Converter Gas Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Kangye Tan & Yihui Tian & Fang Xu & Chunsheng Li, 2023. "Research on Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling for Power Battery Reverse Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Masar Al-Rabeeah & Santosh Kumar & Ali Al-Hasani & Elias Munapo & Andrew Eberhard, 2019. "Bi-objective integer programming analysis based on the characteristic equation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 937-944, October.
    15. R. S. Burachik & C. Y. Kaya & M. M. Rizvi, 2014. "A New Scalarization Technique to Approximate Pareto Fronts of Problems with Disconnected Feasible Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 428-446, August.
    16. Jornada, Daniel & Leon, V. Jorge, 2016. "Biobjective robust optimization over the efficient set for Pareto set reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 573-586.
    17. Ricardo Landa & Giomara Lárraga & Gregorio Toscano, 2019. "Use of a goal-constraint-based approach for finding the region of interest in multi-objective problems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 107-139, February.
    18. Özarık, Sami Serkan & Lokman, Banu & Köksalan, Murat, 2020. "Distribution based representative sets for multi-objective integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 632-643.
    19. Mayerle, Sérgio F. & Rodrigues, Hidelbrando F. & Neiva de Figueiredo, João & De Genaro Chiroli, Daiane M., 2022. "Optimal student/school/class/teacher/classroom matching to support efficient public school system resource allocation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2553-:d:1162343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.