IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2022i1p23-d1009944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validating Measurement Structure of Checklist for Evaluating Ergonomics Risks in Heavy Mobile Machinery Cabs

Author

Listed:
  • Vesna Spasojević Brkić

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Mirjana Misita

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Martina Perišić

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Brkić

    (Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zorica Veljković

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Heavy mobile machinery cabs and their equipment are still not well adjusted to operators, so it is not surprising that we are still witnessing huge consequences of accidents at sites where they operate. The checklist with 39 questions, based on the previous research, is formed, and its’ measurement structure has been tested on the sample of 102 transport, construction, and mining machines, including cranes, excavators, bucket wheel excavators, bulldozers, loaders, graders, backhoe loaders, trenchers, dump trucks, and scrapers by correlation analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown and Kendall’s W coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results validate the measurement structure of a checklist with only 17 items and five constructs. The results show that special attention should be put to the design of armrests and working conditions/exhaust gases, which are negatively correlated to cab interior space and task visibility. All other correlations between seat characteristics, the characteristics of armrests, whole-body vibration influences, reaching commands, the characteristics of cab interior space and environments, and interpersonal relationships are positive, which means that improvements to one area lead to improvements in another. Accordingly, the proposed model should be used for the fast, efficient, and cost-effective evaluation of ergonomics risks and as a guideline for further cab design improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Mirjana Misita & Martina Perišić & Aleksandar Brkić & Zorica Veljković, 2022. "Validating Measurement Structure of Checklist for Evaluating Ergonomics Risks in Heavy Mobile Machinery Cabs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:23-:d:1009944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O., 2004. "The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 98-107, February.
    2. Sarib Malik & Javeria Amin & Muhammad Sharif & Mussarat Yasmin & Seifedine Kadry & Sheraz Anjum, 2022. "Fractured Elbow Classification Using Hand-Crafted and Deep Feature Fusion and Selection Based on Whale Optimization Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandria M. Gain & Leonard V. Coote & André Bonfrer, 2024. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer perceptions of brand wastefulness," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(6), pages 557-575, November.
    2. Saud S. Alghazi & Amirrudin Kamsin & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Seng Yue Wong & Liyana Shuib, 2021. "For Sustainable Application of Mobile Learning: An Extended UTAUT Model to Examine the Effect of Technical Factors on the Usage of Mobile Devices as a Learning Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Chandra Mahapatra, Subas & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar, 2023. "Higher expectations of passengers do really sense: Development and validation a multiple scale-FliQual for air transport service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Rodriguez, Virginie & Sangle-Ferriere, Marion, 2023. "Do supermarkets’ emails have any value for their customers? The effect of emails’ content and interestingness on customers’ attitude and engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Chathurika Sewwandi Kannangara & Rosie Elizabeth Allen & Jerome Francis Carson & Samia Zahraa Noor Khan & Gill Waugh & Kondal Reddy Kandadi, 2020. "Onwards and upwards: The development, piloting and validation of a new measure of academic tenacity- The Bolton Uni-Stride Scale (BUSS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Erhan Boğan & Bekir Bora Dedeoğlu, 2020. "Hotel employees' corporate social responsibility perception and organizational citizenship behavior: Perceived external prestige and pride in organization as serial mediators," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2342-2353, September.
    7. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Rudkowski, Janice, 2024. "Measuring employee-consumer integrated retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. James J. Zboja & Ronald A. Clark & Diana L. Haytko, 2016. "An offer you can’t refuse: consumer perceptions of sales pressure," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 806-821, November.
    10. Massicotte, Steeve & Henri, Jean-François, 2021. "The use of management accounting information by boards of directors to oversee strategy implementation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    11. Sayeed Salih & Samah Abdelsalam & Mosab Hamdan & Ashraf Osman Ibrahim & Anas W. Abulfaraj & Faisal Binzagr & Omayma Husain & Abdallah Elhigazi Abdallah, 2022. "The CSFs from the Perspective of Users in Achieving ERP System Implementation and Post-Implementation Success: A Case of Saudi Arabian Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Yi Xie & Siqing Peng & Daniel P. Hampson, 0. "Brand user imagery clarity (BUIC): conceptualization, measurement, and consequences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    13. Fernandes, Semila & Venkatesh, V.G. & Panda, Rajesh & Shi, Yangyan, 2021. "Measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Brocato, E. Deanne & Voorhees, Clay M. & Baker, Julie, 2012. "Understanding the Influence of Cues from Other Customers in the Service Experience: A Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 384-398.
    15. Conejo Francisco J. & Young Clifford E. & Wooliscroft Ben & Parthasarathy Madhavan, 2021. "Addressing Construct Intensity in Entrepreneurship: Log-Transformed Guttman Scaling with Need for Achievement as Exemplar," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Jeremy S. Wolter & Dora E. Bock & Christopher D. Hopkins & Michael Giebelhausen, 2022. "Not the relationship type? Loyalty propensity as a reason to maintain marketing relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1052-1070, September.
    17. Semila Fernandes & V.G. Venkatesh & Rajesh Panda & Yangyan Shi, 2021. "Measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation," Post-Print hal-04455597, HAL.
    18. Johnson, Jennifer Wiggins & Rapp, Adam, 2010. "A more comprehensive understanding and measure of customer helping behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 787-792, August.
    19. Wang, Tao & Gao, Jie & Jia, Yu & Wang, Cheng Lu, 2022. "The double-edged sword effect of adaptation strategy on performance: The mediation of legitimacy and synergy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 448-456.
    20. Mohamed Amr Sultan & Tomaž Kramberger & Mahmoud Barakat & Ahmed Hussein Ali, 2023. "Barriers to Applying Last-Mile Logistics in the Egyptian Market: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:23-:d:1009944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.