IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i5p682-d755958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Symmetric Reductions under Multi-Choice Non-Transferable-Utility Situations

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Hsien Liao

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, National Pingtung University, Pingtung City 900391, Taiwan)

Abstract

In many game-theoretical results, the reduction axiom and its converse have been regarded as important requirements under axiomatic processes for solutions. However, it is shown that the replicated core counters a specific (inferior) converse reduction axiom under multi-choice non-transferable-utility situations. Thus, two modified reductions and relative properties of the reduction axiom and its converse are proposed to characterize the replicated core in this article.The main methods and relative results are as follows. First, two different types of reductions are proposed by focusing on both participants and participation levels under relative symmetric reducing behavior. Further, relative reduction axioms and their converse are adopted to characterize the replicated core.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Hsien Liao, 2022. "Relative Symmetric Reductions under Multi-Choice Non-Transferable-Utility Situations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:5:p:682-:d:755958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/5/682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/5/682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moulin, Herve, 1985. "The separability axiom and equal-sharing methods," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 120-148, June.
    2. Morton Davis & Michael Maschler, 1965. "The kernel of a cooperative game," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 223-259, September.
    3. Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 1998. "Axiomatizations of neoclassical concepts for economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 87-108, August.
    4. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2010. "The unit-level-core for multi-choice games: the replicated core for TU games," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 161-171, June.
    5. Peleg, B, 1986. "On the Reduced Game Property and Its Converse," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 15(3), pages 187-200.
    6. Peleg, Bezalel, 1985. "An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 203-214, April.
    7. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2020. "A Solution Concept and Its Axiomatic Results under Non-Transferable-Utility and Multi-Choice Situations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Yan-An Hwang & Wen-Hwa Li, 2005. "The core of multi-choice NTU games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 61(1), pages 33-40, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2022. "The Replicated Core under Multi-Choice Non-Transferable- Utility Situations: Converse Reduction Axiomatic Enlargements," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2010. "The unit-level-core for multi-choice games: the replicated core for TU games," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 161-171, June.
    3. Ling-Yun Chung & Yu-Hsien Liao & Wen-Ying Hsieh & Tsu-Yin Chen & Chen-Kun Lin, 2016. "Alternative Reductions and Axiomatizations of the Unit-Level-Core," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2008. "Consistency and the core for fuzzy non-transferable-utility games," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(45), pages 1-6.
    5. Pérez-Castrillo, David & Sun, Chaoran, 2021. "Value-free reductions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 543-568.
    6. Yan-An Hwang, 2013. "On the core: complement-reduced game and max-reduced game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 339-355, May.
    7. Ling-Yun Chung & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2014. "A Consistent Allocation Rule: Non-emptiness, Reductions, Domination and Axiomatization," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 4, pages 61-74, November.
    8. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2020. "A Solution Concept and Its Axiomatic Results under Non-Transferable-Utility and Multi-Choice Situations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    9. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:45:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2018. "The precore: converse consistent enlargements and alternative axiomatic results," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 146-163, April.
    11. Yan-An Hwang & Yu-Hsien Liao, 2011. "The multi-core, balancedness and axiomatizations for multi-choice games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(4), pages 677-689, November.
    12. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2012. "Converse consistent enlargements of the unit-level-core of the multi-choice games," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(4), pages 743-753, December.
    13. Camelia Bejan & Juan Gómez, 2012. "Axiomatizing core extensions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 885-898, November.
    14. Roberto Serrano, 2007. "Cooperative Games: Core and Shapley Value," Working Papers wp2007_0709, CEMFI.
    15. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:70:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Toru Hokari & Yukihiko Funaki & Peter Sudhölter, 2020. "Consistency, anonymity, and the core on the domain of convex games," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(3), pages 187-197, December.
    17. Bas Dietzenbacher & Elena Yanovskaya, 2021. "Consistency of the equal split-off set," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Yanovskaya, Elena, 2023. "The equal split-off set for NTU-games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-67.
    19. M. Hinojosa & E. Romero-Palacios & J. Zarzuelo, 2015. "Consistency of the Shapley NTU value in G-hyperplane games," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(4), pages 259-278, December.
    20. Sudhölter, Peter & Zarzuelo, José M., 2017. "Characterizations of highway toll pricing methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 161-170.
    21. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2008. "The Maximal Equal Allocation of Nonseparable Costs on Multi-Choice Games," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(70), pages 1-8.
    22. Camelia Bejan & Juan Camilo Gómez & Anne van den Nouweland, 2022. "On the importance of reduced games in axiomatizing core extensions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(3), pages 637-668, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:5:p:682-:d:755958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.