IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i20p3758-d940437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Online Activities to Predict the Final Grade of Student

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Gaftandzhieva

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria)

  • Ashis Talukder

    (Statistics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh)

  • Nisha Gohain

    (Directorate of Open and Distance Learning, Dibrugarh University, Assam 786004, India)

  • Sadiq Hussain

    (Examination Branch, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh 786004, India)

  • Paraskevi Theodorou

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Piraeus 18534, Greece)

  • Yass Khudheir Salal

    (Department of Computer Science, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Rositsa Doneva

    (Faculty of Physics and Technology, University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Student success rate is a significant indicator of the quality of the educational services offered at higher education institutions (HEIs). It allows students to make their plans to achieve the set goals and helps teachers to identify the at-risk students and make timely interventions. University decision-makers need reliable data on student success rates to formulate specific and coherent decisions to improve students’ academic performance. In recent years, EDM has become an effective tool for exploring data from student activities to predict their final grades. This study presents a case study for predicting the students’ final grades based on their activities in Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) and attendance in online lectures conducted via Zoom by applying statistical and machine learning techniques. The data set consists of the final grades for 105 students who study Object-Oriented Programming at the University of Plovdiv during the 2021–2022 year, data for their activities in the online course (7057 records), and attendance to lectures (738). The predictions are based on 46 attributes. The Chi-square test is utilized to assess the association between students’ final grades and event context (lectures, source code, exercise, and assignment) and the relationships between attendance at lectures and final results. The logistic regression model is utilized to assess the actual impact of event context on “Fail” students in a multivariate setup. Four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, KNN, and SVM) are applied using 70% of training data and 30% of test data to predict the students’ final grades. Five-fold cross validation was also utilized. The results show correlations between the students’ final grades and their activity in the online course and between students’ final grades and attendance at lectures. All applied machine learning algorithms performed moderately well predicting the students’ final results, as the Random Forest algorithm obtained the highest prediction accuracy—78%. The findings of the study clearly show that the Random Forest algorithm may be used to predict which students will fail after eight weeks. Such data-driven predictions are significant for teachers and decision-makers and allow them to take measures to reduce the number of failed students and identify which types of learning resources or student activities are better predictors of the student’s academic performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Gaftandzhieva & Ashis Talukder & Nisha Gohain & Sadiq Hussain & Paraskevi Theodorou & Yass Khudheir Salal & Rositsa Doneva, 2022. "Exploring Online Activities to Predict the Final Grade of Student," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3758-:d:940437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3758/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3758/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Najib Ali Mozahem, 2020. "Using Learning Management System Activity Data to Predict Student Performance in Face-to-Face Courses," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 20-31, July.
    2. Areej Alhothali & Maram Albsisi & Hussein Assalahi & Tahani Aldosemani, 2022. "Predicting Student Outcomes in Online Courses Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingran Zhang & Feiyue Qiu & Wei Wu & Jiayue Wang & Rongqiang Li & Mujie Guan & Jiang Huang, 2023. "E-Learning Behavior Categories and Influencing Factors of STEM Courses: A Case Study of the Open University Learning Analysis Dataset (OULAD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Abul Abrar Masrur Ahmed & Ravinesh C. Deo & Sujan Ghimire & Nathan J. Downs & Aruna Devi & Prabal D. Barua & Zaher M. Yaseen, 2022. "Introductory Engineering Mathematics Students’ Weighted Score Predictions Utilising a Novel Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Mehwish Naseer & Wu Zhang & Wenhao Zhu, 2020. "Prediction of Coding Intricacy in a Software Engineering Team through Machine Learning to Ensure Cooperative Learning and Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Ala Smadi & Ahmad Al-Qerem & Ahmad Nabot & Issam Jebreen & Amjad Aldweesh & Mohammad Alauthman & Awad M. Abaker & Omer Radhi Al Zuobi & Musab B. Alzghoul, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Competency Exam Data with Machine Learning: Improving Higher Education Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3758-:d:940437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.