IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2930-d888079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Urged Baseline Aid for Execution Amendment of an Online Food Delivery Affability

Author

Listed:
  • Harshitha Urs Ajjipura Shankar

    (Department of Mathematics, Reva University, Bangalore 560064, India)

  • Udaya Kumara Kodipalya Nanjappa

    (Department of Mathematics, Reva University, Bangalore 560064, India)

  • M. D. Alsulami

    (Mathematics Department, College of Sciences and Arts at Alkamil, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ballajja C. Prasannakumara

    (Department of Studies in Mathematics, Davangere University, Davangere 577002, India)

Abstract

The increased demand for this form of food delivery has been expected to drastically alter restaurant patrons’ dining habits. As people have been forced to stay indoors to prevent the virus from spreading, food delivery services over the internet are in high demand. As established in this study, the planned ideal is a good executive implementation for online meal delivery services. Food delivery services are rapidly growing in India, opening up several opportunities for a wide range of online food delivery (OFD) platforms while also generating a competitive commercial sector. Following that, the fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution method (FTOPSIS) is used to rank online food delivery (OFD) enterprises based on the characteristics chosen. In this paper, we study the present multi-criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) paradigm based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) method to achieve the goal. After that, a hierarchy multiple criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) model based on fuzzy sets theory is introduced to deal with the online food delivery Service in the chain system. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is a fuzzy set theory technique for generating criteria weights, which are then used to interpret expert phonological evaluation statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Harshitha Urs Ajjipura Shankar & Udaya Kumara Kodipalya Nanjappa & M. D. Alsulami & Ballajja C. Prasannakumara, 2022. "A Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Urged Baseline Aid for Execution Amendment of an Online Food Delivery Affability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2930-:d:888079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Scott R Baker & Robert A Farrokhnia & Steffen Meyer & Michaela Pagel & Constantine Yannelis & Jeffrey Pontiff, 0. "How Does Household Spending Respond to an Epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 834-862.
    3. Ilija Tanackov & Ibrahim Badi & Željko Stević & Dragan Pamučar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Romualdas Bausys, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Interval Rough SWARA–Interval Rough ARAS Model for Evaluation Strategies of Cleaner Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Zahra Dashtian & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Hana Tomaskova & Mehdi Soltani & Nasim Sadat Mousavi, 2021. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Supply Chain: Threshold of Robustness Worthiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Badri, Masood A., 2001. "A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 27-40, June.
    6. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    7. Prakash, Chandra & Barua, M.K., 2016. "An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 63-81.
    8. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Hung‐Hao Chang & Chad D. Meyerhoefer, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the Demand for Online Food Shopping Services: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 448-465, March.
    10. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Vansnick, Jean-Claude, 2008. "A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1422-1428, June.
    11. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    12. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Feyzioglu, Orhan & Nebol, Erdal, 2008. "Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 148-158, May.
    13. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2002. "A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 166-177, May.
    14. Charlene Li & Miranda Mirosa & Phil Bremer, 2020. "Review of Online Food Delivery Platforms and their Impacts on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Wang, Shih-Yi, 2007. "A survey and optimization-based evaluation of development strategies for the air cargo industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 550-562, April.
    16. Ratapol Wudhikarn, 2015. "An approach to enhancing the human capital of enterprises associated with cooperative education," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 61-81.
    17. Huang, Chi-Cheng & Chu, Pin-Yu & Chiang, Yu-Hsiu, 2008. "A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1038-1052, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wanvipa Wongvilaisakul & Paniti Netinant & Meennapa Rukhiran, 2023. "Dynamic Multi-Criteria Decision Making of Graduate Admission Recommender System: AHP and Fuzzy AHP Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    2. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    3. Dilşad Güzel & Hamit Erdal, 2015. "A Comparative Assesment of Facility Location Problem via fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR: A Case Study on Security Services," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(5), pages 49-61, May.
    4. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2019. "Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    6. Dilşad Güzel & Hamit Erdal, 2015. "A Comparative Assesment of Facility Location Problem via fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR: A Case Study on Security Services," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(5), pages 49-61, May.
    7. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan, 2012. "A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 595-606.
    8. Liu, Shuang & Proctor, Wendy & Cook, David, 2010. "Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2374-2382, October.
    9. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2016. "Managing corporate social responsibility strategies of airports: The case of Taiwan’s Taoyuan International Airport Corporation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 338-348.
    10. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Xu, Yan, 2013. "Managing critical success strategies for an enterprise resource planning project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 604-614.
    11. A. Ford Ramsey & Barry K. Goodwin & William F. Hahn & Matthew T. Holt, 2021. "Impacts of COVID‐19 and Price Transmission in U.S. Meat Markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(3), pages 441-458, May.
    12. Iwona Kowalczuk & Dagmara Stangierska & Jerzy Gębski & Agnieszka Tul-Krzyszczuk & Edyta Zmudczyńska, 2021. "Digital Consumers in the Foodservices Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    14. Jian Wu, 2016. "Consistency in MCGDM Problems with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on an Exponential Score Function," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 399-420, March.
    15. Huang, Hsien-Long, 2023. "Challenges for contactless online food delivery services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: Moderating effects of perceived government response," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Bruno P. Carvalho & Susana Peralta & João Pereira dos Santos, 2022. "Regional and sectorial impacts of the Covid‐19 crisis: Evidence from electronic payments," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 757-798, June.
    17. Chan, Hing Kai & Wang, Xiaojun & Raffoni, Anna, 2014. "An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 344-360.
    18. Akshay Hinduja & Manju Pandey, 2019. "A Distance-based Method for Computing Priorities of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relation and Its Application in AHP," Vision, , vol. 23(4), pages 329-340, December.
    19. Xujie Hu & Chen Liu & Qiannan Zhuo & Dami Moon, 2023. "Assessing CO 2 Emissions of Online Food Delivery in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Xinyi Zhou & Yong Hu & Yong Deng & Felix T. S. Chan & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1045-1066, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2930-:d:888079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.