IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2825-d883497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of PSO-ANN and BOA-ANN Models for Predicting Matric Suction in Expansive Clay Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Davar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 2S5, Canada)

  • Masoud Nobahar

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State University, 1400 J.R. Lynch Street, Jackson, MS 17068, USA)

  • Mohammad Sadik Khan

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State University, 1400 J.R. Lynch Street, Jackson, MS 17068, USA)

  • Farshad Amini

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State University, 1400 J.R. Lynch Street, Jackson, MS 17068, USA)

Abstract

Disasters have different shapes, and one of them is sudden landslides, which can put the safety of highway users at risk and result in crucial economic damage. Along with the risk of human losses, each day a highway malfunctions causes high expenses to citizens, and repairing a failed highway is a time- and cost-consuming process. Therefore, correct highway functioning can be categorized as a high-priority reliability factor for cities. By detecting the failure factors of highway embankment slopes, monitoring them in real-time, and predicting them, managers can make preventive, preservative, and corrective operations that would lead to continuing the function of intracity and intercity highways. Expansive clay soil causes many infrastructure problems throughout the United States, and much of Mississippi’s highway embankments and fill slopes are constructed of this clay soil, also known as High-Volume Change Clay Soil (HVCCS). Landslides on highway embankments are caused by recurrent volume changes due to seasonal moisture variations (wet-dry cycles), and the moisture content of the HVCCS impacts soil shear strength in a vadose zone. Soil Matric Suction (SMS) is another indication of soil shear strength, an essential element to consider. Machine learning develops high-accuracy models for predicting the SMS. The current work aims to develop hybrid intelligent models for predicting the SMS of HVCCS (known as Yazoo clay) based on field instrumentation data. To achieve this goal, six Highway Slopes (HWS) in Jackson Metroplex, Mississippi, were extensively instrumented to track changes over time, and the field data was analyzed and generated to be used in the proposed models. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with a Bayesian Regularization Backpropagation (BR-BP) training algorithm was used, and two intelligent systems, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) were developed to optimize the ANN-BR algorithm for predicting the HWS’ SMS by utilizing 13,690 data points for each variable. Several performance indices, such as coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Mean Square Error (MSE), Variance Account For (VAF), and Regression Error Characteristic (REC), were also computed to analyze the models’ accuracy in prediction outcomes. Based on the analysis results, the PSO-ANN outperformed the BOA-ANN, and both had far better performance than ANN-BR. Moreover, the rainfall had the highest impact on SMS among all other variables and it should be carefully monitored for landslide prediction HWS. The proposed hybrid models can be used for SMS prediction for similar slopes.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Davar & Masoud Nobahar & Mohammad Sadik Khan & Farshad Amini, 2022. "The Development of PSO-ANN and BOA-ANN Models for Predicting Matric Suction in Expansive Clay Soil," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-38, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2825-:d:883497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javed Mallick & Saeed Alqadhi & Swapan Talukdar & Majed AlSubih & Mohd. Ahmed & Roohul Abad Khan & Nabil Ben Kahla & Saud M. Abutayeh, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Resources Exposed to Rainfall Induced Landslide with the Development of GIS and RS Based Ensemble Metaheuristic Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Sina Paryani & Aminreza Neshat & Saman Javadi & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2020. "Comparative performance of new hybrid ANFIS models in landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 1961-1988, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos Polykretis & Manolis G. Grillakis & Athanasios V. Argyriou & Nikos Papadopoulos & Dimitrios D. Alexakis, 2021. "Integrating Multivariate (GeoDetector) and Bivariate (IV) Statistics for Hybrid Landslide Susceptibility Modeling: A Case of the Vicinity of Pinios Artificial Lake, Ilia, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Yigen Qin & Genlan Yang & Kunpeng Lu & Qianzheng Sun & Jin Xie & Yunwu Wu, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Five GIS-Based Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Mapping: A Case Study of Kaiyang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Mahdi Motagh & Shagun Garg & Francesca Cigna & Pietro Teatini & Alok Bhardwaj & Mir A. Matin & Azin Zarei & Kaveh Madani, 2024. "Sustainability Nexus AID: landslides and land subsidence," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Goksu Tuysuzoglu & Kokten Ulas Birant & Derya Birant, 2023. "Rainfall Prediction Using an Ensemble Machine Learning Model Based on K-Stars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Abidhan Bardhan & Raushan Kumar Singh & Sufyan Ghani & Gerasimos Konstantakatos & Panagiotis G. Asteris, 2023. "Modelling Soil Compaction Parameters Using an Enhanced Hybrid Intelligence Paradigm of ANFIS and Improved Grey Wolf Optimiser," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Omid Asadi Nalivan & Ziaedin Badehian & Majid Sadeghinia & Adel Soltani & Iman Islami & Ali Boustan, 2022. "A step beyond susceptibility: an adaptation of risk framework for monetary risk estimation of gully erosion," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1661-1684, March.
    8. Talukdar, Swapan & Naikoo, Mohd Waseem & Mallick, Javed & Praveen, Bushra & Shahfahad, & Sharma, Pritee & Islam, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul & Pal, Swades & Rahman, Atiqur, 2022. "Coupling geographic information system integrated fuzzy logic-analytical hierarchy process with global and machine learning based sensitivity analysis for agricultural suitability mapping," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Hassan Faramarzi & Seyed Mohsen Hosseini & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Mahdi Farnaghi, 2023. "Using machine learning techniques in multi-hazards assessment of Golestan National Park, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3231-3255, July.
    10. Yewei Song & Jie Guo & Fengshan Ma & Jia Liu & Guang Li, 2023. "Improving the Accuracy of Regional Engineering Disturbance Disaster Susceptibility by Optimizing Weight Calculation Methods—A Case Study in the Himalayan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2825-:d:883497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.