IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i15p2789-d881584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Quality Evaluation and Analysis Model for Improving the Quality of Unleaded Gasoline to Reduce Air Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Ming Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Tsun-Hung Huang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411030, Taiwan)

  • Kuen-Suan Chen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411030, Taiwan
    Department of Business Administration, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan
    Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Han Chen

    (Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 500207, Taiwan)

  • Shiyao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
    School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, No. 68, Wenchang Road, Yieryi Street, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

It is important to estimate the sample data when inspecting the quality of products. Therefore, sampling error and uncertainty in the measurement are inevitable, which may lead to misjudgment in product performance evaluation. Since the important quality characteristics of gasoline belong to one-sided specifications, a one-sided specification capability index was proposed to evaluate whether the process capabilities of various quality characteristics of gasoline reach the required quality levels. The 100(1− α )% upper confidence limits of the index were obtained to ensure low producer’s risk and reduce sampling errors. To deal with fuzzy data and limited sample sizes, a fuzzy testing model based on the 100(1− α )% upper confidence limits of the index was developed. A practice example of 95 unleaded gasoline was used to illustrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the proposed method. The result shows that two quality characteristics—Reid vapor pressure and oxygen content—of the nine quality characteristics of the 95 unleaded gasoline should be considered for improvements. This study provided an evaluation procedure to facilitate quality managers to take the opportunity to improve product quality, promoting the improvement of air quality, and the sustainability of industrial processes or products.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Ming Yang & Tsun-Hung Huang & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chi-Han Chen & Shiyao Li, 2022. "Fuzzy Quality Evaluation and Analysis Model for Improving the Quality of Unleaded Gasoline to Reduce Air Pollution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2789-:d:881584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gholamreza Hesamian & Mohamad Ghasem Akbari, 2021. "A process capability index for normal random variable with intuitionistic fuzzy information," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 951-964, June.
    2. Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Moghaddam, Hesam & Pirouzfar, Vahid & Fayyazbakhsh, Ahmad & Su, Chia-Hung, 2021. "Improving the gasoline properties by blending butanol-Al2O3 to optimize the engine performance and reduce air pollution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Wen, Lan-bin & Xin, Chen-Ying & Yang, Shyue-Cheng, 2010. "The effect of adding dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethanol to unleaded gasoline on exhaust emission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-121, January.
    4. Kuen-Suan Chen, 2022. "Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 19-33, April.
    5. Otsuka, Akimasa & Nagata, Fusaomi, 2018. "Quality design method using process capability index based on Monte-Carlo method and real-coded genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 358-364.
    6. Zainab Abbasi Ganji & Bahram Sadeghpour Gildeh, 2020. "Fuzzy process capability indices for simple linear profile," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(12), pages 2136-2158, September.
    7. Kagan, Abram M. & Malinovsky, Yaakov, 2013. "Monotonicity in the sample size of the length of classical confidence intervals," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 78-82.
    8. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2022. "Lifetime performance evaluation and analysis model of passive component capacitor products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 51-64, April.
    9. Dobbin, Kevin K. & Ionan, Alexei C., 2015. "Sample size methods for constructing confidence intervals for the intra-class correlation coefficient," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 67-83.
    10. Mingyuan Li & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu & Chun-Ming Yang, 2021. "A Fuzzy Evaluation Decision Model for the Ratio Operating Performance Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Chen & Ting-Hsin Hsu & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Ming Yang, 2022. "A Fuzzy Improvement Testing Model of Bank APP Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Kuo-Ching Chiou, 2023. "Building Up of Fuzzy Evaluation Model of Life Performance Based on Type-II Censored Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2024. "Confidence-interval-based fuzzy supplier selection model with lifetime performance index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 133-147, September.
    4. Sibel Osman & Olga Valerica Sapunaru & Ancaelena Eliza Sterpu & Timur Vasile Chis & Claudia I.Koncsag, 2023. "Impact of Adding Bioethanol and Dimethyl Carbonate on Gasoline Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Yao, Yung-Chen & Tsai, Jiun-Horng & Wang, I-Ting, 2013. "Emissions of gaseous pollutant from motorcycle powered by ethanol–gasoline blend," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 93-100.
    6. Stolze, Hannah J. & Brusco, Michael J. & Smith, Jeffery S., 2021. "Exploring the social mechanisms for variation reduction for direct store delivery (DSD) and vendor managed inventory performance: An integrated network governance and coordination theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Yin-Yin Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Chin Huang, 2022. "Sustainable Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Concerning Multi-Objective Risk Attitudes in Group Decision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang & Chun-Min Yu & Hui-E Lee, 2024. "Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Operational Performance of Air Cleaning Equipment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Huijian Han & Ye Yang & Rui Zhang & Brekhna Brekhna, 2020. "Factors and Paths of Transformation and Upgradation of Chemical Industry in Shandong, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2024. "Developing a novel fuzzy testing model for capability index with asymmetric tolerances," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 149-162, September.
    11. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Wen-Yang Kao, 2022. "Fuzzy Evaluation Models for Accuracy and Precision Indices," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Sangho Lee & Jeongsub Choi & Youngdoo Son, 2024. "Efficient visibility algorithm for high-frequency time-series: application to fault diagnosis with graph convolutional network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 813-833, August.
    13. Costagliola, M.A. & De Simio, L. & Iannaccone, S. & Prati, M.V., 2013. "Combustion efficiency and engine out emissions of a S.I. engine fueled with alcohol/gasoline blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1162-1171.
    14. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu & Tsang-Chuan Chang & Hsuan-Yu Chen, 2024. "Fuzzy evaluation of product reliability based on ratio-based lifetime performance index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 163-180, September.
    15. Chun-Min Yu & Win-Jet Luo & Ting-Hsin Hsu & Kuei-Kuei Lai, 2020. "Two-Tailed Fuzzy Hypothesis Testing for Unilateral Specification Process Quality Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Senthilraja, R. & Sivakumar, V. & Thirugnanasambandham, K. & Nedunchezhian, N., 2016. "Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a dual fuel engine with Diesel–Ethanol – Cotton seed oil Methyl ester blends and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 899-907.
    17. Ryu, Kyung Hwan & Kim, Boeun & Heo, Seongmin, 2022. "Sustainability analysis framework based on global market dynamics: A carbon capture and utilization industry case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Kuen-Suan Chen & Feng-Chia Li & Kuei-Kuei Lai & Jung-Mao Lin, 2022. "Green Outsourcer Selection Model Based on Confidence Interval of PCI for SMT Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Mao Lin & Xiaoteng Zhang & Mingsheng Wen & Chuanqi Zhang & Xiangen Kong & Zhiyang Jin & Zunqing Zheng & Haifeng Liu, 2022. "Effects of Unconventional Additives in Gasoline on the Performance of a Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Karimi Abiyazani, Narges & Pirouzfar, Vahid & Su, Chia-Hung, 2022. "Enhancing engine power and torque and reducing exhaust emissions of blended fuels derived from gasoline-propanol-nano particles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2789-:d:881584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.