IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i14p2534-d868233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Cognitive and Skill Learning on the Joint Vendor–Buyer Model with Imperfect Quality and Fuzzy Random Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Kaifang Fu

    (School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

  • Zhixiang Chen

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Guolin Zhou

    (School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the optimization of an integrated production–inventory system that consists of an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) supplier and an OEM brand company. The cognitive and skill learning effect, imperfect quality, and fuzzy random demand are incorporated into the integrated two-echelon supply chain model to minimize the total cost. We contribute to dividing the learning effect into cognitive learning and skill learning, we build a new learning curve to resemble the real complexity more closely and avoid the problem that production time tends towards zero after production is stable. In total, five production–inventory models are constructed. Furthermore, a solution procedure is designed to solve the model to obtain the optimal order quantities, and the optimal shipment size. Additionally, the symbolic distance method is used to deal with the inverse fuzzification. Then numerical analysis shows that the increase of the cognitive learning coefficient and skill learning coefficient will reduce the total cost of the production–inventory system. With the increase of the cognitive learning coefficient, the gap between the total cost of cognitive learning and skill learning, and that of Wright learning, correspondingly decreases consistently. However, with the increase of the skill learning coefficient, there is a consistent corresponding increase. The total cost of cognitive learning and skill learning shows hyperbolic characteristics. The important insights of this study for managers are that employees’ knowledge plays an important role in reducing costs in the early learning stage and humanistic management measures should be taken to reduce employees’ turnover. Compared with the skill learning training for production technicians, we should pay more attention to the training of cognitive learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaifang Fu & Zhixiang Chen & Guolin Zhou, 2022. "The Effects of Cognitive and Skill Learning on the Joint Vendor–Buyer Model with Imperfect Quality and Fuzzy Random Demand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2534-:d:868233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    2. Gour Chandra Mahata, 2017. "A production-inventory model with imperfect production process and partial backlogging under learning considerations in fuzzy random environments," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 883-897, April.
    3. Jaber, M. Y. & Glock, C. H., 2013. "A learning curve for tasks with cognitive and motor elements," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 59707, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Sujit Kumar De & Kousik Bhattacharya, 2022. "A Pollution Sensitive Marxian Production Inventory Model with Deterioration Under Fuzzy System," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 598-627, February.
    5. Chen, Zhixiang & Bidanda, Bopaya, 2019. "Sustainable manufacturing production-inventory decision of multiple factories with JIT logistics, component recovery and emission control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 356-383.
    6. Md Sadikur Rahman & Subhajit Das & Amalesh Kumar Manna & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Asoke Kumar Bhunia & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & Gerardo Treviño-Garza & Armando Céspedes-Mota, 2021. "A Mathematical Model of the Production Inventory Problem for Mixing Liquid Considering Preservation Facility," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Jaber, M.Y. & Goyal, S.K. & Imran, M., 2008. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality subject to learning effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 143-150, September.
    8. ElHafsi, Mohsen & Fang, Jianxin & Hamouda, Essia, 2021. "Optimal production and inventory control of multi-class mixed backorder and lost sales demand class models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 147-161.
    9. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    2. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    3. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    4. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    5. Lee, Sunghee & Kim, Daeki, 2014. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production–distribution model with both deteriorating and defective items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 161-170.
    6. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Ehsan Shekarian & Eleonora Bottani & Roberto Montanari, 2016. "A fuzzy lot-sizing problem with two-stage composite human learning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 5010-5025, August.
    8. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    9. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Rabta, Boualem & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Coordinating quality decisions in a two-stage supply chain under buyer dominance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Bikash Koli Dey & Hyesung Seok, 2024. "Intelligent inventory management with autonomation and service strategy," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 307-330, January.
    11. Mahesh Kumar Jayaswal & Mandeep Mittal, 2022. "Impact of Inflation and Credit Financing Policy on the Supply Chain With Learning," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    13. Mahesh Kumar Jayaswal & Mandeep Mittal & Isha Sangal, 2021. "Ordering policies for deteriorating imperfect quality items with trade-credit financing under learning effect," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(1), pages 112-125, February.
    14. Basim S. O. Alsaedi, 2024. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Model with a Setup Cost Reduction Policy for Imperfect Items under Learning in a Cloudy Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-33, May.
    15. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    16. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    17. Chen, Tsung-Hui & Tsao, Yu-Chung, 2014. "Optimal lot-sizing integration policy under learning and rework effects in a manufacturer–retailer chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 239-248.
    18. S. Çetinkaya & Y. Zhang & E. Akçalı, 2017. "Vendor-buyer inventory problem revisited: modeling random yield and trade credit," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1265-1278, October.
    19. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    20. Mahesh Kumar Jayaswal & Isha Sangal & Mandeep Mittal, 2022. "Impact of Credit Financing on the Ordering Policy for Imperfect Quality Items With Learning and Shortages," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2534-:d:868233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.