IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i3p57-d885327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted Interpretive Structural Modeling for Supply Chain Risk Management: An Application to Logistics Service Providers in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Zuhal Cilingir Uk

    (Department of Tourism Management, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55440, Turkey)

  • Cigdem Basfirinci

    (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Trabzon University, Trabzon 61335, Turkey)

  • Amit Mitra

    (Department of Systems and Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-6266, USA)

Abstract

Background : The aim of this paper is to introduce weighted interpretive structural modeling approach to supply chain risk management efforts by presenting an application to identify micro risks of logistics service providers at the industry level in Turkey. Methods : In this research, eighteen risk factors in the logistics sector have been identified through both literature review and recommendations from a group of academicians and experts in the sector. A survey was conducted to rank these risks. They were further analyzed through a weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach in order to demonstrate mutual relationships among these risks. Results : Finally, using a WISM approach, an analysis was conducted to identify the driving and dependence power of the risk factors. This study covers a variety of micro-risk factors of logistics service providers and demonstrates the relationships among them and clusters them based on their driving and dependence power. Conclusions : Such a clustering of the risk factors helps us identify those that affect the others and are of paramount importance in risk management and mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuhal Cilingir Uk & Cigdem Basfirinci & Amit Mitra, 2022. "Weighted Interpretive Structural Modeling for Supply Chain Risk Management: An Application to Logistics Service Providers in Turkey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:3:p:57-:d:885327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/3/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/3/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    3. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    4. Tobias Bier & Anne Lange & Christoph H. Glock, 2020. "Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1835-1856, March.
    5. Ricardo Chalmeta & José-Eduardo Barqueros-Muñoz, 2021. "Using Big Data for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Muhammad Khan & Hee Yong Lee & Jung Han Bae, 2019. "The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    7. İsmail Çağrı Özcan & Volkan Recai Çetin & Muhammed Bilge Kağan Albayrak, 2018. "A Delphi-based scenario analysis of Turkish logistics industry for 2023," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(3), pages 349-373.
    8. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Gallus, Philipp & Thomas, David, 2011. "Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 55230, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven & Yeniyurt, Sengun, 2015. "An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 618-627.
    10. Venkatesh, V.G. & Rathi, Snehal & Patwa, Sriyans, 2015. "Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 153-167.
    11. Arisa Shaikh & Waqar Ahmed, 2022. "Understanding influence of supply chain relationships in retail channels on risk management," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(1), pages 153-176, March.
    12. Tang, Christopher & Tomlin, Brian, 2008. "The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 12-27, November.
    13. Mahesh Chand & Tilak Raj & Ravi Shankar, 2014. "Analysing the operational risks in supply chain by using weighted interpretive structure modelling technique," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 378-403.
    14. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H. & Bhattacharjya, Jyotirmoyee, 2021. "Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    16. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    17. Kumar, Manoj & Vrat, Prem & Shankar, Ravi, 2006. "A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 273-285, June.
    18. Jonathan Welburn & Vicki Bier & Steven Hoerning, 2016. "Import Security: Assessing the Risks of Imported Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2047-2064, November.
    19. Kevin B. Hendricks & Vinod R. Singhal, 2005. "Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 695-711, May.
    20. Berger, Paul D. & Gerstenfeld, Arthur & Zeng, Amy Z., 2004. "How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 9-15, February.
    21. Qiang, Patrick & Nagurney, Anna, 2012. "A bi-criteria indicator to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 801-812.
    22. Thi Huong Tran & Mario Dobrovnik & Sebastian Kummer, 2018. "Supply chain risk assessment: a content analysis-based literature review," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(4), pages 562-591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nitad Jaisue & Nipon Ketjoy & Malinee Kaewpanha & Prapita Thanarak, 2023. "The Barriers Analysis for Waste-to-Energy Project Development in Thailand: Using an Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    2. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    3. Chowdhury, Nighat Afroz & Ali, Syed Mithun & Mahtab, Zuhayer & Rahman, Towfique & Kabir, Golam & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2019. "A structural model for investigating the driving and dependence power of supply chain risks in the readymade garment industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 102-113.
    4. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    5. Nguyen, Son & Shu-Ling Chen, Peggy & Du, Yuquan, 2022. "Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 144-156.
    7. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    8. Marcus V. C. Fagundes & Bernd Hellingrath & Francisco G. M. Freires, 2021. "Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Nikelowski, Lukas & Voss, Rika, 2021. "Approach for application-specific selection of risk assessment methods," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 853-877, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    10. Bodendorf, Frank & Sauter, Maximilian & Franke, Jörg, 2023. "A mixed methods approach to analyze and predict supply disruptions by combining causal inference and deep learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Li, Gang & Fan, Huan & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 83-94.
    12. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    13. Baghersad, Milad & Zobel, Christopher W., 2021. "Assessing the extended impacts of supply chain disruptions on firms: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Lin, Yongjia & Fan, Di & Shi, Xuanyi & Fu, Maggie, 2021. "The effects of supply chain diversification during the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    16. Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Kaisar, Shahriar & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Kraude, Richard & Narayanan, Sriram & Talluri, Srinivas, 2022. "Evaluating the performance of supply chain risk mitigation strategies using network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1168-1182.
    18. Jesus Felix Bayta Valenzuela & Xiuju Fu & Gaoxi Xiao & Rick Siow Mong Goh, 2018. "A Network-Based Impact Measure for Propagated Losses in a Supply Chain Network Consisting of Resilient Components," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, February.
    19. Venkatesh, V.G. & Rathi, Snehal & Patwa, Sriyans, 2015. "Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 153-167.
    20. Fahim ul Amin & Qingkai Ji & María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Qian-Li Dong & Shamsa Kanwal & Iram Zulfiqar, 2023. "The Moderating Effect of Customer Relationship on Supply Chain Risk Management and Organization Performance in Logistics Sector of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:3:p:57-:d:885327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.