IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v12y2023i2p28-d1095966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin M. Fisk

    (School of Natural, Social and Sport Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK)

Abstract

This paper is a qualitative documentary analysis of six restorative justice reporting templates used by the Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England for collecting restorative justice service data. Findings identify differences in the following areas: general presentation and format of templates; types of data recorded; areas of interest; definitions and use of descriptive language; methods and timing for counting data; and interpretation of restorative justice processes and outcomes. Conclusions highlight the need to standardise definitions and methods, outlining potential pitfalls when using data to draw further conclusions when equivalency is problematic, and further research avenues that could illuminate the use of data to evidence effectiveness, efficiency, impact and success.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin M. Fisk, 2023. "What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:28-:d:1095966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/2/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/2/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Strang & Lawrence W Sherman & Evan Mayo‐Wilson & Daniel Woods & Barak Ariel, 2013. "Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face‐to‐Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calabrese, Curtis G. & Molesworth, Brett R.C. & Hatfield, Julie & Slavich, Eve, 2022. "Effects of the Federal Aviation Administration's Compliance Program on aircraft incidents and accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 304-319.
    2. Yotam Shem‐Tov & Steven Raphael & Alissa Skog, 2024. "Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make‐it‐Right Program," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(1), pages 61-78, January.
    3. Hannah Gaffney & Darrick Jolliffe & Elizabeth Eggins & Joana Gomes Ferreira & Guy Skinner & Barak Ariel & Heather Strang, 2024. "Protocol: The effect of restorative justice interventions for young people on offending and reoffending: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    4. Karen R. Quail & Catherine L. Ward, 2023. "Using Non-Violent Discipline Tools: Evidence Suggesting the Importance of Attunement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-26, December.
    5. April, Keisha & Schrader, Shannon W. & Walker, Toni E. & Francis, Robert M. & Glynn, Hector & Gordon, Derrick M., 2023. "Conceptualizing juvenile justice reform: Integrating the public health, social ecological, and restorative justice models," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:28-:d:1095966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.