IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i10p382-d425460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four Decades of Land-Cover Change on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska: Detecting Disturbance-Influenced Vegetation Shifts Using Landsat Legacy Data

Author

Listed:
  • Carson A. Baughman

    (U.S. Geological Survey—Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA)

  • Rachel A. Loehman

    (U.S. Geological Survey—Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA)

  • Dawn R. Magness

    (Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1 Ski Hill Rd., Soldotna, AK 99669, USA)

  • Lisa B. Saperstein

    (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Region, 1011 East Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503, USA)

  • Rosemary L. Sherriff

    (Department of Geography, Environment & Spatial Analysis, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst St., Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

Abstract

Across Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula, disturbance events have removed large areas of forest over the last half century. Simultaneously, succession and landscape evolution have facilitated forest regrowth and expansion. Detecting forest loss within known pulse disturbance events is often straightforward given that reduction in tree cover is a readily detectable and measurable land-cover change. Land-cover change is more difficult to quantify when disturbance events are unknown, remote, or environmental response is slow in relation to human observation. While disturbance events and related land-cover change are relatively instant, assessing patterns of post-disturbance succession requires long term monitoring. Here, we describe a method for classifying land cover and quantifying land-cover change over time, using Landsat legacy imagery for three historical eras on the western Kenai Peninsula: 1973–2002, 2002–2017, and 1973–2017. Scenes from numerous Landsat sensors, including summer and winter seasons, were acquired between 1973 and 2017 and used to classify vegetation cover using a random forest classifier. Land-cover type was summarized by era and combined to produce a dataset capturing spatially explicit land-cover change at a moderate 30-m resolution. Our results document large-scale forest loss across the study area that can be attributed to known disturbance events including beetle kill and wildfire. Despite numerous and extensive disturbances resulting in forest loss, we estimate that the study area has experienced net forest gain over the duration of our study period due to reforestation within large fire events that predate this study. Transition between forest and graminoid non-forest land cover including wetlands and herbaceous uplands is the most common land-cover change—representing recruitment of a graminoid dominated understory following forest loss and the return of forest canopy given sufficient time post-disturbance.

Suggested Citation

  • Carson A. Baughman & Rachel A. Loehman & Dawn R. Magness & Lisa B. Saperstein & Rosemary L. Sherriff, 2020. "Four Decades of Land-Cover Change on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska: Detecting Disturbance-Influenced Vegetation Shifts Using Landsat Legacy Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:382-:d:425460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/10/382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/10/382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xanthe J. Walker & Jennifer L. Baltzer & Steven G. Cumming & Nicola J. Day & Christopher Ebert & Scott Goetz & Jill F. Johnstone & Stefano Potter & Brendan M. Rogers & Edward A. G. Schuur & Merritt R., 2019. "Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7770), pages 520-523, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Min & Yuan, Mengchu & Han, Pingyang & Wang, Dan, 2022. "Assessing sustainable urban development based on functional spatial differentiation of urban agriculture in Wuhan, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Shu & Chunming Shi & Bole Yi & Pengwu Zhao & Lijuan Guan & Mei Zhou, 2022. "Influence of Climatic Factors on Lightning Fires in the Primeval Forest Region of the Northern Daxing’an Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Emmett, Kristen D. & Renwick, Katherine M. & Poulter, Benjamin, 2021. "Adapting a dynamic vegetation model for regional biomass, plant biogeography, and fire modeling in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Evaluating LPJ-GUESS-LMfireCF," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    3. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "New Approaches for Ecological and Social Sustainability in a Post-Pandemic World," World, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-14, October.
    4. C. E. Richards & R. C. Lupton & J. M. Allwood, 2021. "Re-framing the threat of global warming: an empirical causal loop diagram of climate change, food insecurity and societal collapse," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Xi Li & Yao Chen & Shixiong Jiang & Chongqing Wang & Sunxian Weng & Dengyong Rao, 2022. "The Importance of Adding Short-Wave Infrared Bands for Forest Disturbance Monitoring in the Subtropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-9, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:382-:d:425460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.