IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i11p167-d284116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tree Wind Breaks in Central Asia and Their Effects on Agricultural Water Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Thevs

    (World Agroforestry, Central Asia Office, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan)

  • Alina Joana Gombert

    (Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Bee Protection, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Eva Strenge

    (Institute of Water Quality and Resource Management, Technical University of Vienna, 1040 Vienna, Austria)

  • Roland Lleshi

    (Faculty Forest and Environment, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany)

  • Kumar Aliev

    (World Agroforestry, Central Asia Office, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan)

  • Begaiym Emileva

    (World Agroforestry, Central Asia Office, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan)

Abstract

Across Central Asia, agriculture largely depends on irrigation due to arid and semi-arid climatic conditions. Water is abstracted from rivers, which are largely fed by glacier melt. In the course of climate change, glaciers melt down so that a reduced glacier volume and reduced water runoffs are expected to be available for irrigation. Tree wind breaks are one option to reduce water consumption in irrigated agriculture and build resilience against climate change. This paper therefore assesses the water consumption of major crops in Kyrgyzstan and adjacent areas, i.e., cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), corn ( Zea mays L.), rice ( Oryza sativa L.), potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.), and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) in combination with tree wind breaks. Crop water consumption was assessed through the Penman Monteith approach. Tree wind break types investigated were single rows from poplars ( Populus spec.) and multiple rows with understory vegetation by elm ( Ulmus minor L.) and poplar, respectively. Tree water consumption was determined through sapflow measurements. The seasonal reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for field crops was 876–995 mm without wind breaks and dropped to less than half through multiple row wind breaks with understory vegetation (50 m spacing). Tree water consumption was 1125–1558 mm for poplar and 435 mm for elm. Among the wind break crop systems, elm wind breaks resulted in the highest reductions of water consumption, followed by single row poplars, at spacing of 50 and 100 m, respectively. However, elm grows much slower than poplar, so poplars might be more attractive for farmers. Furthermore, single row wind breaks might by much easier to be integrated into the agrarian landscape as they consume less space.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Thevs & Alina Joana Gombert & Eva Strenge & Roland Lleshi & Kumar Aliev & Begaiym Emileva, 2019. "Tree Wind Breaks in Central Asia and Their Effects on Agricultural Water Consumption," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:167-:d:284116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/11/167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/11/167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xiao & Zhu, Jiaojun & Xing, Zefeng, 2016. "Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 49-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ranjan, Ram, 2022. "Optimal restoration of common property resources under uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie & Chunxia Lu & Changshun Zhang & Jie Xu & Jingya Liu & Keyu Qin & Yiqiu Li & Chaoxuan Xu & Caixia Zhang & Yangyang Wang & Shuang Gan & Jia Liu & Liqiang Ge, 2021. "Suggestions for Revegetation over the Next 30 Years Based on Precipitation in the Three North Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Matthew Heron Wilson & Sarah Taylor Lovell, 2016. "Agroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Pengfei Cheng & Jie Li & Hongli Zhang & Guanghua Cheng, 2023. "Sustainable Management Behavior of Farmland Shelterbelt of Farmers in Ecologically Fragile Areas: Empirical Evidence from Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:167-:d:284116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.