IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v6y2017i3p65-d112392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Historical Maps within a GIS to Analyze Two Centuries of Rural Landscape Changes in Southern Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Dina Statuto

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Cillis

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

  • Pietro Picuno

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

Abstract

The current characteristics of a rural landscape may be better understood if suitable information related to its past is available. The availability of a Geographical Information System (GIS) can enable the analysis of landscape features in relation to several aspects, e.g., the evolution and mutual inter-relation among different ecosystems, the impact and sustainability of human activities, the visual characteristics of a landscape, etc. The analysis of geographical information, derived from historical maps, within a GIS could, therefore, prove to be a very powerful tool, for a better-informed decision-making and management of a rural landscape. With the aim to identify the land use changes in a rural area located in the Basilicata Region (Southern Italy), a territorial analysis was conducted through a GIS, in which data taken from historical maps—covering a period of 184 years, from 1829 to 2013—were implemented. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the rural landscape during different periods were obtained through digital terrain models (DTM). The land cover changes were also evaluated, demonstrating how they have affected the quality of the forest ecosystem in the area. The final results that were obtained comparing historical documents and current maps enabled the evaluation of the multi-temporal, morphological, and vegetation variations in this rural landscape. The analysis that was conducted has great potential for assessing and monitoring landscape diversity and typical changes of vegetation, even in different geographical locations, where appropriate interventions in landscape structures may be so planned.

Suggested Citation

  • Dina Statuto & Giuseppe Cillis & Pietro Picuno, 2017. "Using Historical Maps within a GIS to Analyze Two Centuries of Rural Landscape Changes in Southern Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:65-:d:112392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/3/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/3/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iván Franch-Pardo & Luis Cancer-Pomar & Brian M. Napoletano, 2017. "Visibility analysis and landscape evaluation in Martin river cultural park (Aragon, Spain) integrating biophysical and visual units," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 415-424, November.
    2. Mutoko, Morgan C. & Hein, Lars & Bartholomeus, Harm, 2014. "Integrated analysis of land use changes and their impacts on agrarian livelihoods in the western highlands of Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salvatore Di Fazio & Giuseppe Modica, 2018. "Historic Rural Landscapes: Sustainable Planning Strategies and Action Criteria. The Italian Experience in the Global and European Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Kyung Wook Seo & Sugie Lee, 2019. "Oxcart Route in the City: Tracking the Urbanization Process of an Agricultural Village in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Chiara Minioto & Francesco Martinico & Maria Rosa Trovato & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2023. "Data and Values: Axiological Interpretations of Building Sprawl Landscape Risk in the Rural Territory of Noto (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Andrea Garzulino & Maria Paola Borgarino & Davide Del Curto, 2021. "When GIS Joins the Conservation Management Plan of a 20th-Century Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Anna Roccati & Fabio Luino & Laura Turconi & Pietro Piana & Charles Watkins & Francesco Faccini, 2018. "Historical Geomorphological Research of a Ligurian Coastal Floodplain (Italy) and Its Value for Management of Flood Risk and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Alessia Cogato & Andrea Pezzuolo & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Roberta De Bei & Marco Sozzi & Francesco Marinello, 2020. "A GIS-Based Multicriteria Index to Evaluate the Mechanisability Potential of Italian Vineyard Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Valentina Santarsiero & Antonio Lanorte & Gabriele Nolè & Giuseppe Cillis & Biagio Tucci & Beniamino Murgante, 2023. "Analysis of the Effect of Soil Erosion in Abandoned Agricultural Areas: The Case of NE Area of Basilicata Region (Southern Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Corrado Cencetti & Filippo Paciotti & Ettore A. Sannipoli & Ubaldo E. Scavizzi, 2023. "The Multidisciplinary Approach in the Study of Landscape Evolution: The Fluvial Capture of the San Donato Creek (Gubbio, Central Italy), an Example of Hydrological Regime and Hydrogeological Risk Chan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Vincenzo De Santis & Angela Rizzo & Giovanni Scardino & Giovanni Scicchitano & Massimo Caldara, 2023. "A Procedure for Evaluating Historical Land Use Change and Resilience in Highly Reclaimed Coastal Areas: The Case of the Tavoliere di Puglia (Southern Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Giuseppe Cillis & Dina Statuto & Pietro Picuno, 2021. "Historical GIS as a Tool for Monitoring, Preserving and Planning Forest Landscape: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Anna Lyjak, 2021. "Analysis of Changes in Agricultural Use of Land After Poland’s Accession to the EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 517-533.
    13. Lathouwers, Eline & Segers, Yves & Verstraeten, Gert, 2023. "Reconstructing valley landscapes. GIS-analyses of past land use changes in three Flemish river valleys since the late 18th century," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Salvador García-Ayllón, 2018. "Predictive Diagnosis of Agricultural Periurban Areas Based on Territorial Indicators: Comparative Landscape Trends of the So-Called “Orchard of Europe”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Zhiwei Wan & Xi Chen & Min Ju & Chaohao Ling & Guangxu Liu & Fuqiang Liao & Yulian Jia & Meixin Jiang, 2020. "Reconstruction and Pattern Analysis of Historical Urbanization of Pre-Modern China in the 1910s Using Topographic Maps and the GIS-ESDA Model: A Case Study in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis & Theano S. Terkenli & Maria Gabriella Trovato & Nizar Abu-Jaber, 2018. "Landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean between the Future and the Past," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-5, December.
    17. Jie Wang & Weiwei Zhang & Zengxiang Zhang, 2018. "Quantifying the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Rural Settlements and the Associated Impacts on Land Use in an Undeveloped Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Maria Maddalena Tortorella & Senatro Di Leo & Carmelina Cosmi & Patrícia Fortes & Mauro Viccaro & Mario Cozzi & Filomena Pietrapertosa & Monica Salvia & Severino Romano, 2020. "A Methodological Integrated Approach to Analyse Climate Change Effects in Agri-Food Sector: The TIMES Water-Energy-Food Module," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Zaheer Abbas & Guang Yang & Yuanjun Zhong & Yaolong Zhao, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Future Scenario of LULC Using the CA-ANN Approach: A Case Study of the Greater Bay Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Aleksandra Gierko, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of the Pre-War Landscape Transformations in the Face of Contemporary Urban Challenges on the Example of Gajowice in Wrocław," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, May.
    21. Evangelos Papadias & Vassilis Detsis & Antonis Hadjikyriacou & Apostolos G. Papadopoulos & Christoforos Vradis & Christos Chalkias, 2023. "Long-Term Dynamics of Viticultural Landscape in Cyprus—Four Centuries of Expansion, Contraction and Spatial Displacement," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    22. George D Malaperdas & Vayia V Panagiotidis, 2018. "The aspects of Aspect: Understanding land exposure and its part in geographic information systems analysis," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 1022-1037, September.
    23. George-Adrian Istrate & Vasilică Istrate & Adrian Ursu & Pavel Ichim & Iuliana-Gabriela Breabăn, 2023. "Using Diachronic Cartography and GIS to Map Forest Landscape Changes in the Putna-Vrancea Natural Park, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timler, Carl & Alvarez, Stéphanie & DeClerck, Fabrice & Remans, Roseline & Raneri, Jessica & Estrada Carmona, Natalia & Mashingaidze, Nester & Abe Chatterjee, Shantonu & Chiang, Tsai Wei & Termote, Ce, 2020. "Exploring solution spaces for nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Kenya and Vietnam," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Kyalo Willy, Daniel & Muyanga, Milu & Jayne, Thomas, 2019. "Can economic and environmental benefits associated with agricultural intensification be sustained at high population densities? A farm level empirical analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 100-110.
    3. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak, 2019. "Borough Development Dependent on Agricultural, Tourism, and Economy Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Lie Wang & Chuanhao Sun & Mo Wang, 2024. "Optimization Strategies for Waterfront Plant Landscapes in Traditional Villages: A Scenic Beauty Estimation–Entropy Weighting Method Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Wenli Dong & Chenlu Zhang & Wenying Han & Jiwu Wang, 2024. "Localized Canal Development Model Based on Titled Landscapes on the Grand Canal, Hangzhou Section, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, July.
    6. Iván Franch-Pardo & Brian M. Napoletano & Gerardo Bocco & Sara Barrasa & Luis Cancer-Pomar, 2017. "The Role of Geographical Landscape Studies for Sustainable Territorial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Pietro De Marinis & Samuele De Petris & Filippo Sarvia & Giacinto Manfron & Evelyn Joan Momo & Tommaso Orusa & Gianmarco Corvino & Guido Sali & Enrico Mondino Borgogno, 2021. "Supporting Pro-Poor Reforms of Agricultural Systems in Eastern DRC (Africa) with Remotely Sensed Data: A Possible Contribution of Spatial Entropy to Interpret Land Management Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Dingde Xu & Zhixing Ma & Xin Deng & Yi Liu & Kai Huang & Wenfeng Zhou & Zhuolin Yong, 2020. "Relationships between Land Management Scale and Livelihood Strategy Selection of Rural Households in China from the Perspective of Family Life Cycle," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Mutoko, Morgan C. & Hein, Lars & Shisanya, Chris A., 2015. "Tropical forest conservation versus conversion trade-offs: Insights from analysis of ecosystem services provided by Kakamega rainforest in Kenya," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:65-:d:112392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.